Manual knowledge acquisition is usually a costly and time-consuming process. Automatic knowledge acquisition methods can then significantly support the knowledge engineer. In this paper, we propose an approach for rapid knowledge capture. The methodology is based on textual subgroup mining in order to discover dependencies for rule prototyping.

In this paper, we are interested in the qualitative knowledge that underlies some given probabilistic information. To represent such qualitative structures, we use ordinal conditional functions, OCFs, (or ranking functions) as a qualitative abstraction of probability functions. The basic idea for transforming probabilities into ordinal rankings is to find well-behaved clusterings of the negative logarithms of the probabilities. We show how popular clustering tools can be used for this, and propose measures for the evaluation of the clustering results in this context. From the so obtained ranking functions, we extract conditionals that may serve as a base for inductive default reasoning.

In this paper certain knowledge and software engineering methods integration issues are discussed. The principal idea is to consider an effective design and implementation framework for rule design with UML, and implementation with Java. The solution proposed in the paper consists of using a custom knowledge engineering design method for rules in the design stage. The rule base is then transformed to UML behavioral diagrams, which can be considered a visual encoding. The rule implementation involves the serialization to Java language using classes representing the decision tables grouping rules sharing the same attributes.

Evaluating changes in documentation of technical products is a key issue in knowledge management. A product may be declined in different versions and one way to evaluate changes is to compare the sets of documents which describe each version. The aim of this paper is to propose a framework for exhibiting changes between sets of documents. This framework is based on the representation of the sets of documents in terms of association rules and on the definition of first order predicates for reasoning with these association rules. The aim of the reasoning stage is to exhibit the differences between the sets of documents. These predicates show what rules are specific to a corpus or how differs the usage of concepts appearing in the associations rules. The framework is  experimented with the comparison of two corpuses of documents which describe documentation about two different versions of a spatial component.

In this search, we focused on supervised learning task using association rules algorithms (association based classification). These algorithms, developed in unsupervised learning, extract all the rules whose the support and confidence exceed a prefixed threshold support. After extracting the frequent itemsets, (i.e their support exceeds the threshold support), algorithms subdivide these itemsets to build the rules, and keep only the rules whose confidence exceeds the threshold confidence. The extraction of class association rules, using these algorithms, have several problems, because of the rules' a posteriori filtering. In the first stage, one extracts useless frequent itemsets, those which do not contain class, whereas the second stage can be simplified, since an itemset containing the class gives place only to only one class rule. In order to be able to work with a low threshold support, we propose FCP-Growth an adaptation of FP-Growth which eliminates the frequent itemsets not containing a class. Moreover, to make the minority class be in advantage during the construction of the class itemsets, we adapt the threshold support, in order to use the same threshold support inside each class.

Augmenting probabilities to conditional logic yields an expressive mechanism for representing uncertainty. The principle of optimum entropy allows one to reason in probabilistic logic in an information-theoretic optimal way by completing the given information as unbiasedly as possible. In this paper, we introduce the MEcore system that realises the core functionalities for an intelligent agent reasoning at optimum entropy and that provides powerful mechanisms for belief management operations like revision, update, diagnosis, or hypothetical what-if-analysis.

In this paper knowledge representation and inference issues for rule-based systems are discussed. The paper deals with improving the logical calculus of Set Attributive Logic founding an expressive rule language XTT2. Representation extensions are introduced, and practical inference rules provided. The original includes an extended state specification, as well as interpreter design. xamples of rule analysis are given. Visual design tool HQed assuring rule quality is also presented.

Handling missing values in training datasets for constructing learning models or extracting useful information is considered to be an important research task in data mining and knowledge discovery in databases. In recent years, lot of techniques are proposed for imputing missing values by considering attribute relationships with missing value observation and other observations of training dataset. The main deficiency of such techniques is that, they depend upon single approach and do not combine multiple approaches, that why they are less accurate. To improve the accuracy of missing values imputation, in this paper we introduce a novel partial matching concept in association rules mining, which shows better results as compared to full matching concept that we described in our previous work. Our imputation technique combines the partial matching concept in association rules with k-nearest neighbor approach. Since this is a hybrid technique, therefore its accuracy is much better than as compared to those techniques which depend upon single approach. To check the efficiency of our technique, we also provide detail experimental results on number of benchmark datasets which show better results as compared to previous approaches.

In a certain number of situations, human cognitive functioning is difficult to represent with classical artificial intelligence structures. Such a difficulty arises in the polyneuropathy diagnosis which is based on the spatial distribution, along the nerve fibres, of lesions, together with the synthesis of several partial diagnoses. Faced with this problem while building up an expert system (NEUROP), we developed a heterogeneous knowledge representation associating a finite automaton with first order logic. A number of knowledge representation problems raised by the electromyography test features are examined in this study and the expert system architecture allowing such a knowledge modeling are laid out.

In a significant minority of cases, certain pronouns, especially the pronoun it, can be used without referring to any specific entity. This phenomenon of pleonastic pronoun usage poses serious problems for systems aiming at even a shallow understanding of natural language texts. In this paper, a novel approach is proposed to identify such uses of it: the extrapositional cases are identified using a series of queries against the web, and the cleft cases are identified using a simple set of syntactic rules. The system is evaluated with four sets of news articles containing 679 extrapositional cases as well as 78 cleft constructs. The identification results are comparable to those obtained by human efforts.