Machine Translation
Letz Translate: Low-Resource Machine Translation for Luxembourgish
Song, Yewei, Ezzini, Saad, Klein, Jacques, Bissyande, Tegawende, Lefebvre, Clément, Goujon, Anne
Natural language processing of Low-Resource Languages (LRL) is often challenged by the lack of data. Therefore, achieving accurate machine translation (MT) in a low-resource environment is a real problem that requires practical solutions. Research in multilingual models have shown that some LRLs can be handled with such models. However, their large size and computational needs make their use in constrained environments (e.g., mobile/IoT devices or limited/old servers) impractical. In this paper, we address this problem by leveraging the power of large multilingual MT models using knowledge distillation. Knowledge distillation can transfer knowledge from a large and complex teacher model to a simpler and smaller student model without losing much in performance. We also make use of high-resource languages that are related or share the same linguistic root as the target LRL. For our evaluation, we consider Luxembourgish as the LRL that shares some roots and properties with German. We build multiple resource-efficient models based on German, knowledge distillation from the multilingual No Language Left Behind (NLLB) model, and pseudo-translation. We find that our efficient models are more than 30\% faster and perform only 4\% lower compared to the large state-of-the-art NLLB model.
Denoising-based UNMT is more robust to word-order divergence than MASS-based UNMT
Banerjee, Tamali, Murthy, Rudra V, Bhattacharyya, Pushpak
We aim to investigate whether UNMT approaches with self-supervised pre-training are robust to word-order divergence between language pairs. We achieve this by comparing two models pre-trained with the same self-supervised pre-training objective. The first model is trained on language pairs with different word-orders, and the second model is trained on the same language pairs with source language re-ordered to match the word-order of the target language. Ideally, UNMT approaches which are robust to word-order divergence should exhibit no visible performance difference between the two configurations. In this paper, we investigate two such self-supervised pre-training based UNMT approaches, namely Masked Sequence-to-Sequence Pre-Training, (MASS) (which does not have shuffling noise) and Denoising AutoEncoder (DAE), (which has shuffling noise). We experiment with five English$\rightarrow$Indic language pairs, i.e., en-hi, en-bn, en-gu, en-kn, and en-ta) where word-order of the source language is SVO (Subject-Verb-Object), and the word-order of the target languages is SOV (Subject-Object-Verb). We observed that for these language pairs, DAE-based UNMT approach consistently outperforms MASS in terms of translation accuracies. Moreover, bridging the word-order gap using reordering improves the translation accuracy of MASS-based UNMT models, while it cannot improve the translation accuracy of DAE-based UNMT models. This observation indicates that DAE-based UNMT is more robust to word-order divergence than MASS-based UNMT. Word-shuffling noise in DAE approach could be the possible reason for the approach being robust to word-order divergence.
TranSpeech: Speech-to-Speech Translation With Bilateral Perturbation
Huang, Rongjie, Liu, Jinglin, Liu, Huadai, Ren, Yi, Zhang, Lichao, He, Jinzheng, Zhao, Zhou
Specifically, a sequence of discrete representations derived in a self-supervised manner are predicted from the model and passed to a vocoder for speech reconstruction, while still facing the following challenges: 1) Acoustic multimodality: the discrete units derived from speech with same content could be indeterministic due to the acoustic property (e.g., rhythm, pitch, and energy), which causes deterioration of translation accuracy; 2) high latency: current S2ST systems utilize autoregressive models which predict each unit conditioned on the sequence previously generated, failing to take full advantage of parallelism. In this work, we propose TranSpeech, a speech-to-speech translation model with bilateral perturbation. To alleviate the acoustic multimodal problem, we propose bilateral perturbation (BiP), which consists of the style normalization and information enhancement stages, to learn only the linguistic information from speech samples and generate more deterministic representations. With reduced multimodality, we step forward and become the first to establish a non-autoregressive S2ST technique, which repeatedly masks and predicts unit choices and produces high-accuracy results in just a few cycles. Experimental results on three language pairs demonstrate that BiP yields an improvement of 2.9 BLEU on average compared with a baseline textless S2ST model. Moreover, our parallel decoding shows a significant reduction of inference latency, enabling speedup up to 21.4x than autoregressive technique. Speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) aims at converting speech from one language into speech in another, significantly breaking down communication barriers between people not sharing a common language. Among the conventional method (Lavie et al., 1997; Nakamura et al., 2006; Wahlster, 2013), the cascaded system of automatic speech recognition (ASR), machine translation (MT), or speech-to-text translation (S2T) followed by text-to-speech synthesis (TTS) have demonstrated reasonable results yet suffering from expensive computational costs.
Understanding Natural Language Understanding Systems. A Critical Analysis
The development of machines that {\guillemotleft}talk like us{\guillemotright}, also known as Natural Language Understanding (NLU) systems, is the Holy Grail of Artificial Intelligence (AI), since language is the quintessence of human intelligence. The brief but intense life of NLU research in AI and Natural Language Processing (NLP) is full of ups and downs, with periods of high hopes that the Grail is finally within reach, typically followed by phases of equally deep despair and disillusion. But never has the trust that we can build {\guillemotleft}talking machines{\guillemotright} been stronger than the one engendered by the last generation of NLU systems. But is it gold all that glitters in AI? do state-of-the-art systems possess something comparable to the human knowledge of language? Are we at the dawn of a new era, in which the Grail is finally closer to us? In fact, the latest achievements of AI systems have sparkled, or better renewed, an intense scientific debate on their true language understanding capabilities. Some defend the idea that, yes, we are on the right track, despite the limits that computational models still show. Others are instead radically skeptic and even dismissal: The present limits are not just contingent and temporary problems of NLU systems, but the sign of the intrinsic inadequacy of the epistemological and technological paradigm grounding them. This paper aims at contributing to such debate by carrying out a critical analysis of the linguistic abilities of the most recent NLU systems. I contend that they incorporate important aspects of the way language is learnt and processed by humans, but at the same time they lack key interpretive and inferential skills that it is unlikely they can attain unless they are integrated with structured knowledge and the ability to exploit it for language use.
Hidden Markov Transformer for Simultaneous Machine Translation
Simultaneous machine translation (SiMT) outputs the target sequence while receiving the source sequence, and hence learning when to start translating each target token is the core challenge for SiMT task. However, it is non-trivial to learn the optimal moment among many possible moments of starting translating, as the moments of starting translating always hide inside the model and can only be supervised with the observed target sequence. In this paper, we propose a Hidden Markov Transformer (HMT), which treats the moments of starting translating as hidden events and the target sequence as the corresponding observed events, thereby organizing them as a hidden Markov model. HMT explicitly models multiple moments of starting translating as the candidate hidden events, and then selects one to generate the target token. During training, by maximizing the marginal likelihood of the target sequence over multiple moments of starting translating, HMT learns to start translating at the moments that target tokens can be generated more accurately. Recently, with the increase of real-time scenarios such as live broadcasting, video subtitles and conferences, simultaneous machine translation (SiMT) attracts more attention (Cho & Esipova, 2016; Gu et al., 2017; Ma et al., 2019; Arivazhagan et al., 2019), which requires the model to receive source token one by one and simultaneously generates the target tokens. For the purpose of high-quality translation under low latency, SiMT model needs to learn when to start translating each target token (Gu et al., 2017), thereby making a wise decision between waiting for the next source token (i.e., READ action) and generating a target token (i.e., WRITE action) during the translation process. However, learning when to start translating target tokens is not trivial for a SiMT model, as the moments of starting translating always hide inside the model and we can only supervise the SiMT model with the observed target sequence (Zhang & Feng, 2022a).
A Systematic Analysis of Vocabulary and BPE Settings for Optimal Fine-tuning of NMT: A Case Study of In-domain Translation
Sharami, J. Pourmostafa Roshan, Shterionov, D., Spronck, P.
The effectiveness of Neural Machine Translation (NMT) models largely depends on the vocabulary used at training; small vocabularies can lead to out-of-vocabulary problems -- large ones, to memory issues. Subword (SW) tokenization has been successfully employed to mitigate these issues. The choice of vocabulary and SW tokenization has a significant impact on both training and fine-tuning an NMT model. Fine-tuning is a common practice in optimizing an MT model with respect to new data. However, new data potentially introduces new words (or tokens), which, if not taken into consideration, may lead to suboptimal performance. In addition, the distribution of tokens in the new data can differ from the distribution of the original data. As such, the original SW tokenization model could be less suitable for the new data. Through a systematic empirical evaluation, in this work we compare different strategies for SW tokenization and vocabulary generation with the ultimate goal to uncover an optimal setting for fine-tuning a domain-specific model. Furthermore, we developed several (in-domain) models, the best of which achieves 6 BLEU points improvement over the baseline.
Fairness in Language Models Beyond English: Gaps and Challenges
Ramesh, Krithika, Sitaram, Sunayana, Choudhury, Monojit
With language models becoming increasingly ubiquitous, it has become essential to address their inequitable treatment of diverse demographic groups and factors. Most research on evaluating and mitigating fairness harms has been concentrated on English, while multilingual models and non-English languages have received comparatively little attention. This paper presents a survey of fairness in multilingual and non-English contexts, highlighting the shortcomings of current research and the difficulties faced by methods designed for English. We contend that the multitude of diverse cultures and languages across the world makes it infeasible to achieve comprehensive coverage in terms of constructing fairness datasets. Thus, the measurement and mitigation of biases must evolve beyond the current dataset-driven practices that are narrowly focused on specific dimensions and types of biases and, therefore, impossible to scale across languages and cultures.
Plan-then-Seam: Towards Efficient Table-to-Text Generation
Li, Liang, Geng, Ruiying, Fang, Chengyang, Li, Bing, Ma, Can, Li, Binhua, Li, Yongbin
Table-to-text generation aims at automatically generating text to help people conveniently obtain salient information in tables. Recent works explicitly decompose the generation process into content planning and surface generation stages, employing two autoregressive networks for them respectively. However, they are computationally expensive due to the non-parallelizable nature of autoregressive decoding and the redundant parameters of two networks. In this paper, we propose the first totally non-autoregressive table-to-text model (Plan-then-Seam, PTS) that produces its outputs in parallel with one single network. PTS firstly writes and calibrates one plan of the content to be generated with a novel rethinking pointer predictor, and then takes the plan as the context for seaming to decode the description. These two steps share parameters and perform iteratively to capture token inter-dependency while keeping parallel decoding. Experiments on two public benchmarks show that PTS achieves 3.0~5.6 times speedup for inference time, reducing 50% parameters, while maintaining as least comparable performance against strong two-stage table-to-text competitors.
An evaluation of Google Translate for Sanskrit to English translation via sentiment and semantic analysis
Shukla, Akshat, Bansal, Chaarvi, Badhe, Sushrut, Ranjan, Mukul, Chandra, Rohitash
Google Translate has been prominent for language translation; however, limited work has been done in evaluating the quality of translation when compared to human experts. Sanskrit one of the oldest written languages in the world. In 2022, the Sanskrit language was added to the Google Translate engine. Sanskrit is known as the mother of languages such as Hindi and an ancient source of the Indo-European group of languages. Sanskrit is the original language for sacred Hindu texts such as the Bhagavad Gita. In this study, we present a framework that evaluates the Google Translate for Sanskrit using the Bhagavad Gita. We first publish a translation of the Bhagavad Gita in Sanskrit using Google Translate. Our framework then compares Google Translate version of Bhagavad Gita with expert translations using sentiment and semantic analysis via BERT-based language models. Our results indicate that in terms of sentiment and semantic analysis, there is low level of similarity in selected verses of Google Translate when compared to expert translations. In the qualitative evaluation, we find that Google translate is unsuitable for translation of certain Sanskrit words and phrases due to its poetic nature, contextual significance, metaphor and imagery. The mistranslations are not surprising since the Bhagavad Gita is known as a difficult text not only to translate, but also to interpret since it relies on contextual, philosophical and historical information. Our framework lays the foundation for automatic evaluation of other languages by Google Translate
kNN-BOX: A Unified Framework for Nearest Neighbor Generation
Zhu, Wenhao, Zhao, Qianfeng, Lv, Yunzhe, Huang, Shujian, Zhao, Siheng, Liu, Sizhe, Chen, Jiajun
Augmenting the base neural model with a token-level symbolic datastore is a novel generation paradigm and has achieved promising results in machine translation (MT). In this paper, we introduce a unified framework kNN-BOX, which enables quick development and interactive analysis for this novel paradigm. kNN-BOX decomposes the datastore-augmentation approach into three modules: datastore, retriever and combiner, thus putting diverse kNN generation methods into a unified way. Currently, kNN-BOX has provided implementation of seven popular kNN-MT variants, covering research from performance enhancement to efficiency optimization. It is easy for users to reproduce these existing works or customize their own models. Besides, users can interact with their kNN generation systems with kNN-BOX to better understand the underlying inference process in a visualized way. In the experiment section, we apply kNN-BOX for machine translation and three other seq2seq generation tasks, namely, text simplification, paraphrase generation and question generation. Experiment results show that augmenting the base neural model with kNN-BOX leads to a large performance improvement in all these tasks. The code and document of kNN-BOX is available at https://github.com/NJUNLP/knn-box.