A key question in vision is how to represent our knowledge of previously encountered objects to classify new ones. The answer depends on how we determine the similarity of two objects. Similarity tells us how relevant each previously seen object is in determining the category to which a new object belongs.

A key question in vision is how to represent our knowledge of previously encountered objects to classify new ones. The answer depends on how we determine the similarity of two objects. Similarity tells us how relevant each previously seen object is in determining the category to which a new object belongs.

The approaches are incorporated into ThetaBoost, a boosting algorithm fordealing with unequal loss functions. The performance of ThetaBoost and the two approaches are tested experimentally.

Multiple-instance learning is a variation on supervised learning, where the task is to learn a concept given positive and negative bags of instances. Each bag may contain many instances, but a bag is labeled positive even if only one of the instances in it falls within the concept. A bag is labeled negative only if all the instances in it are negative. We describe a new general framework, called Diverse Density, for solving multiple-instance learning problems. We apply this framework to learn a simple description of a person from a series of images (bags) containing that person, to a stock selection problem, and to the drug activity prediction problem.

Recognition of specific objects, such as recognition of a particular face, can be based on representations that are object centered, such as 3D structural models. Alternatively, a 3D object may be represented for the purpose of recognition in terms of a set of views. This latter class of models is biologically attractive because model acquisition - the learning phase - is simpler and more natural. A simple model for this strategy of object recognition was proposed by Poggio and Edelman (Poggio and Edelman, 1990). They showed that, with few views of an object usedas training examples, a classification network, such as a Gaussian radial basis function network, can learn to recognize novel views of that object, in partic- 42 E.Bricolo, T. Poggio and N. Logothetis (a) (b) View angle Figure 1: (a) Schematic representation of the architecture of the Poggio-Edelman model. The shaded circles correspond to the view-tuned units, each tuned to a view of the object, while the open circle correspond to the view-invariant, object specific output unit.

Recognition of specific objects, such as recognition of a particular face, can be based on representations that are object centered, such as 3D structural models. Alternatively, a 3D object may be represented for the purpose of recognition in terms of a set of views. This latter class of models is biologically attractive because model acquisition - the learning phase - is simpler and more natural. A simple model for this strategy of object recognition was proposed by Poggio and Edelman (Poggio and Edelman, 1990). They showed that, with few views of an object used as training examples, a classification network, such as a Gaussian radial basis function network, can learn to recognize novel views of that object, in partic- 42 E. Bricolo, T. Poggio and N. Logothetis

We compare two strategies for training connectionist (as well as nonconnectionist) modelsfor statistical pattern recognition. The probabilistic strategy is based on the notion that Bayesian discrimination (i.e.- optimal classification) isachieved when the classifier learns the a posteriori class distributions of the random feature vector. The differential strategy is based on the notion that the identity of the largest class a posteriori probability of the feature vector is all that is needed to achieve Bayesian discrimination. Each strategy is directly linked to a family ofobjective functions that can be used in the supervised training procedure. We prove that the probabilistic strategy - linked with error measure objective functions such as mean-squared-error and cross-entropy - typically used to train classifiers necessarily requires larger training sets and more complex classifier architectures than those needed to approximate the Bayesian discriminant function.In contrast.

Learning an input-output mapping from a set of examples can be regarded as synthesizing an approximation of a multidimensional function.

A massively parallel, all-digital, stochastic architecture - TlnMAN N - is described which performs competitive and Kohonen types of learning. A VLSI design is shown for a TlnMANN neuron which fits within a small, inexpensive MOSIS TinyChip frame, yet which can be used to build larger networks of several hundred neurons. The neuron operates at a speed of 15 MHz which allows the network to process 290,000 training examples per second. Use of level sensitive scan logic provides the chip with 100% fault coverage, permitting very reliable neural systems to be built.

Learning an input-output mapping from a set of examples can be regarded as synthesizing an approximation of a multidimensional function.