Causal representation learning (CRL) aims to learn low-dimensional causal latent variables from high-dimensional observations. While identifiability has been extensively studied for CRL, estimation has been less explored. In this paper, we explore the use of empirical Bayes (EB) to estimate causal representations. In particular, we consider the problem of learning from data from multiple domains, where differences between domains are modeled by interventions in a shared underlying causal model. Multi-domain CRL naturally poses a simultaneous inference problem that EB is designed to tackle. Here, we propose an EB $f$-modeling algorithm that improves the quality of learned causal variables by exploiting invariant structure within and across domains. Specifically, we consider a linear measurement model and interventional priors arising from a shared acyclic SCM. When the graph and intervention targets are known, we develop an EM-style algorithm based on causally structured score matching. We further discuss EB $g$-modeling in the context of existing CRL approaches. In experiments on synthetic data, our proposed method achieves more accurate estimation than other methods for CRL.

Despite their dominance in vision and language, deep neural networks often underperform relative to tree-based models on tabular data. To bridge this gap, we incorporate five key inductive biases into deep learning: robustness to irrelevant features, axis alignment, localized irregularities, feature heterogeneity, and training stability. We propose \emph{LassoFlexNet}, an architecture that evaluates the linear and nonlinear marginal contribution of each input via Per-Feature Embeddings, and sparsely selects relevant variables using a Tied Group Lasso mechanism. Because these components introduce optimization challenges that destabilize standard proximal methods, we develop a \emph{Sequential Hierarchical Proximal Adaptive Gradient optimizer with exponential moving averages (EMA)} to ensure stable convergence. Across $52$ datasets from three benchmarks, LassoFlexNet matches or outperforms leading tree-based models, achieving up to a $10$\% relative gain, while maintaining Lasso-like interpretability. We substantiate these empirical results with ablation studies and theoretical proofs confirming the architecture's enhanced expressivity and structural breaking of undesired rotational invariance.

Uncovering causal relationships is a fundamental problem across science and engineering. However, most existing causal discovery methods assume acyclicity and direct access to the system variables -- assumptions that fail to hold in many real-world settings. For instance, in genomics, cyclic regulatory networks are common, and measurements are often corrupted by instrumental noise. To address these challenges, we propose RECLAIM, a causal discovery framework that natively handles both cycles and measurement noise. RECLAIM learns the causal graph structure by maximizing the likelihood of the observed measurements via expectation-maximization (EM), using residual normalizing flows for tractable likelihood computation. We consider two measurement models: (i) Gaussian additive noise, and (ii) a linear measurement system with additive Gaussian noise. We provide theoretical consistency guarantees for both the settings. Experiments on synthetic data and real-world protein signaling datasets demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed method.

A data analysis pipeline is a structured sequence of steps that transforms raw data into meaningful insights by integrating multiple analysis algorithms. In many practical applications, analytical findings are obtained only after data pass through several data-dependent procedures within such pipelines. In this study, we address the problem of quantifying the statistical reliability of results produced by data analysis pipelines. As a proof of concept, we focus on clustering pipelines that identify cluster structures from complex and heterogeneous data through procedures such as outlier detection, feature selection, and clustering. We propose a novel statistical testing framework to assess the significance of clustering results obtained through these pipelines. Our framework, based on selective inference, enables the systematic construction of valid statistical tests for clustering pipelines composed of predefined components. We prove that the proposed test controls the type I error rate at any nominal level and demonstrate its validity and effectiveness through experiments on synthetic and real datasets.

We propose a principled framework for unsupervised domain adaptation under covariate shift in kernel Generalized Linear Models (GLMs), encompassing kernelized linear, logistic, and Poisson regression with ridge regularization. Our goal is to minimize prediction error in the target domain by leveraging labeled source data and unlabeled target data, despite differences in covariate distributions. We partition the labeled source data into two batches: one for training a family of candidate models, and the other for building an imputation model. This imputation model generates pseudo-labels for the target data, enabling robust model selection. We establish non-asymptotic excess-risk bounds that characterize adaptation performance through an "effective labeled sample size", explicitly accounting for the unknown covariate shift. Experiments on synthetic and real datasets demonstrate consistent performance gains over source-only baselines.

Probabilistic circuit (PC) structure learning is hampered by greedy algorithms that make irreversible, locally optimal decisions. We propose SymCircuit, which replaces greedy search with a learned generative policy trained via entropy-regularized reinforcement learning. Instantiating the RL-as-inference framework in the PC domain, we show the optimal policy is a tempered Bayesian posterior, recovering the exact posterior when the regularization temperature is set inversely proportional to the dataset size. The policy is implemented as SymFormer, a grammar-constrained autoregressive Transformer with tree-relative self-attention that guarantees valid circuits at every generation step. We introduce option-level REINFORCE, restricting gradient updates to structural decisions rather than all tokens, yielding an SNR (signal to noise ratio) improvement and >10 times sample efficiency gain on the NLTCS dataset. A three-layer uncertainty decomposition (structural via model averaging, parametric via the delta method, leaf via conjugate Dirichlet-Categorical propagation) is grounded in the multilinear polynomial structure of PC outputs. On NLTCS, SymCircuit closes 93% of the gap to LearnSPN; preliminary results on Plants (69 variables) suggest scalability.

We derive the asymptotic risk function of regularized empirical risk minimization (ERM) estimators tuned by $n$-fold cross-validation (CV). The out-of-sample prediction loss of such estimators converges in distribution to the squared-error loss (risk function) of shrinkage estimators in the normal means model, tuned by Stein's unbiased risk estimate (SURE). This risk function provides a more fine-grained picture of predictive performance than uniform bounds on worst-case regret, which are common in learning theory: it quantifies how risk varies with the true parameter. As key intermediate steps, we show that (i) $n$-fold CV converges uniformly to SURE, and (ii) while SURE typically has multiple local minima, its global minimum is generically well separated. Well-separation ensures that uniform convergence of CV to SURE translates into convergence of the tuning parameter chosen by CV to that chosen by SURE.

Quantum principal component analysis (qPCA) is commonly formulated as the extraction of eigenvalues and eigenvectors of a covariance-encoded density operator. Yet in many qPCA settings, the practical objective is simpler: projecting data onto the dominant spectral subspace. In this work, we introduce a projection-first framework, the Filtered Spectral Projection Algorithm (FSPA), which bypasses explicit eigenvalue estimation while preserving the essential spectral structure. FSPA amplifies any nonzero warm-start overlap with the leading principal subspace and remains robust in small-gap and near-degenerate regimes without inducing artificial symmetry breaking in the absence of bias. To connect this approach to classical datasets, we show that for amplitude-encoded centered data, the ensemble density matrix $ρ=\sum_i p_i|ψ_i\rangle\langleψ_i|$ coincides with the covariance matrix. For uncentered data, $ρ$ corresponds to PCA without centering, and we derive eigenvalue interlacing bounds quantifying the deviation from standard PCA. We further show that ensembles of quantum states admit an equivalent centered covariance interpretation. Numerical demonstrations on benchmark datasets, including Breast Cancer Wisconsin and handwritten Digits, show that downstream performance remains stable whenever projection quality is preserved. These results suggest that, in a broad class of qPCA settings, spectral projection is the essential primitive, and explicit eigenvalue estimation is often unnecessary.

We study the problem of learning a low-degree spherical polynomial of degree $k_0 = Θ(1) \ge 1$ defined on the unit sphere in $\RR^d$ by training an over-parameterized two-layer neural network with augmented feature in this paper. Our main result is the significantly improved sample complexity for learning such low-degree polynomials. We show that, for any regression risk $\eps \in (0, Θ(d^{-k_0})]$, an over-parameterized two-layer neural network trained by a novel Gradient Descent with Projection (GDP) requires a sample complexity of $n \asymp Θ( \log(4/δ) \cdot d^{k_0}/\eps)$ with probability $1-δ$ for $δ\in (0,1)$, in contrast with the representative sample complexity $Θ(d^{k_0} \max\set{\eps^{-2},\log d})$. Moreover, such sample complexity is nearly unimprovable since the trained network renders a nearly optimal rate of the nonparametric regression risk of the order $\log({4}/δ) \cdot Θ(d^{k_0}/{n})$ with probability at least $1-δ$. On the other hand, the minimax optimal rate for the regression risk with a kernel of rank $Θ(d^{k_0})$ is $Θ(d^{k_0}/{n})$, so that the rate of the nonparametric regression risk of the network trained by GDP is nearly minimax optimal. In the case that the ground truth degree $k_0$ is unknown, we present a novel and provable adaptive degree selection algorithm which identifies the true degree and achieves the same nearly optimal regression rate. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time that a nearly optimal risk bound is obtained by training an over-parameterized neural network with a popular activation function (ReLU) and algorithmic guarantee for learning low-degree spherical polynomials. Due to the feature learning capability of GDP, our results are beyond the regular Neural Tangent Kernel (NTK) limit.

We highlight a striking difference in behavior between two widely used variants of coordinate ascent variational inference: the sequential and parallel algorithms. While such differences were known in the numerical analysis literature in simpler settings, they remain largely unexplored in the optimization-focused literature on variational inference in more complex models. Focusing on the moderately high-dimensional linear regression problem, we show that the sequential algorithm, although typically slower, enjoys convergence guarantees under more relaxed conditions than the parallel variant, which is often employed to facilitate block-wise updates and improve computational efficiency.