Offline reinforcement learning (RL) can learn control policies from static datasets but, like standard RL methods, it requires reward annotations for every transition. In many cases, labeling large datasets with rewards may be costly, especially if those rewards must be provided by human labelers, while collecting diverse unlabeled data might be comparatively inexpensive. How can we best leverage such unlabeled data in offline RL? One natural solution is to learn a reward function from the labeled data and use it to label the unlabeled data. In this paper, we find that, perhaps surprisingly, a much simpler method that simply applies zero rewards to unlabeled data leads to effective data sharing both in theory and in practice, without learning any reward model at all. While this approach might seem strange (and incorrect) at first, we provide extensive theoretical and empirical analysis that illustrates how it trades off reward bias, sample complexity and distributional shift, often leading to good results. We characterize conditions under which this simple strategy is effective, and further show that extending it with a simple reweighting approach can further alleviate the bias introduced by using incorrect reward labels. Our empirical evaluation confirms these findings in simulated robotic locomotion, navigation, and manipulation settings.

In recent years, autonomous networks have been designed with Predictive Quality of Service (PQoS) in mind, as a means for applications operating in the industrial and/or automotive sectors to predict unanticipated Quality of Service (QoS) changes and react accordingly. In this context, Reinforcement Learning (RL) has come out as a promising approach to perform accurate predictions, and optimize the efficiency and adaptability of wireless networks. Along these lines, in this paper we propose the design of a new entity, implemented at the RAN-level that, with the support of an RL framework, implements PQoS functionalities. Specifically, we focus on the design of the reward function of the learning agent, able to convert QoS estimates into appropriate countermeasures if QoS requirements are not satisfied. We demonstrate via ns-3 simulations that our approach achieves the best trade-off in terms of QoS and Quality of Experience (QoE) performance of end users in a teleoperated-driving-like scenario, compared to other baseline solutions.

Mobile edge computing (MEC) is considered a novel paradigm for computation-intensive and delay-sensitive tasks in fifth generation (5G) networks and beyond. However, its uncertainty, referred to as dynamic and randomness, from the mobile device, wireless channel, and edge network sides, results in high-dimensional, nonconvex, nonlinear, and NP-hard optimization problems. Thanks to the evolved reinforcement learning (RL), upon iteratively interacting with the dynamic and random environment, its trained agent can intelligently obtain the optimal policy in MEC. Furthermore, its evolved versions, such as deep RL (DRL), can achieve higher convergence speed efficiency and learning accuracy based on the parametric approximation for the large-scale state-action space. This paper provides a comprehensive research review on RL-enabled MEC and offers insight for development in this area. More importantly, associated with free mobility, dynamic channels, and distributed services, the MEC challenges that can be solved by different kinds of RL algorithms are identified, followed by how they can be solved by RL solutions in diverse mobile applications. Finally, the open challenges are discussed to provide helpful guidance for future research in RL training and learning MEC.

Standard model-free reinforcement learning algorithms optimize a policy that generates the action to be taken in the current time step in order to maximize expected future return. While flexible, it faces difficulties arising from the inefficient exploration due to its single step nature. In this work, we present Generative Planning method (GPM), which can generate actions not only for the current step, but also for a number of future steps (thus termed as generative planning). This brings several benefits to GPM. Firstly, since GPM is trained by maximizing value, the plans generated from it can be regarded as intentional action sequences for reaching high value regions. GPM can therefore leverage its generated multi-step plans for temporally coordinated exploration towards high value regions, which is potentially more effective than a sequence of actions generated by perturbing each action at single step level, whose consistent movement decays exponentially with the number of exploration steps. Secondly, starting from a crude initial plan generator, GPM can refine it to be adaptive to the task, which, in return, benefits future explorations. This is potentially more effective than commonly used action-repeat strategy, which is non-adaptive in its form of plans. Additionally, since the multi-step plan can be interpreted as the intent of the agent from now to a span of time period into the future, it offers a more informative and intuitive signal for interpretation. Experiments are conducted on several benchmark environments and the results demonstrated its effectiveness compared with several baseline methods.

This tutorial is adapted from the one on ViZDoom's website. Additionally, the code used here is adapted from this tutorial, with substantial modification. Machine learning allows us to program by example. We can present the algorithm with some data, potentially provide it some feedback, and then glean the results of our system. For image classification, we give the model some images and it learns to identify what object(s) are in that image.

Let me share my journey as Global Future Skills & Computer Science – Artificial Intelligence Expert. We have Served 7000 Students and 500 Teachers and 5000 Other students, I have done Global Future Skills Implementation and Future Skills Research for last 15 Years. I am Lifelong Lerner of Future Skills, Future Technologies. I have Spent 75000 USD on 1. Digital Skills 2. Future Skills 3. Freedom and Transformation Skills 4.Technologies Skills 5.Soft Skills and I have done 500 global digital and future skills trainings.

Reinforcement learning is the fourth major learning method in machine learning, along with supervised, unsupervised, and semi-supervised learning. The main difference is that the model does not need any data to train. It learns structures by being rewarded for desired behaviors and punished for bad ones.

Recent protocols and metrics for training and evaluating autonomous robot navigation through crowds are inconsistent due to diversified definitions of "social behavior". This makes it difficult, if not impossible, to effectively compare published navigation algorithms. Furthermore, with the lack of a good evaluation protocol, resulting algorithms may fail to generalize, due to lack of diversity in training. To address these gaps, this paper facilitates a more comprehensive evaluation and objective comparison of crowd navigation algorithms by proposing a consistent set of metrics that accounts for both efficiency and social conformity, and a systematic protocol comprising multiple crowd navigation scenarios of varying complexity for evaluation. We tested four state-of-the-art algorithms under this protocol. Results revealed that some state-of-the-art algorithms have much challenge in generalizing, and using our protocol for training, we were able to improve the algorithm's performance. We demonstrate that the set of proposed metrics provides more insight and effectively differentiates the performance of these algorithms with respect to efficiency and social conformity.

Suppose investors want to directly predict the future transaction price or ups and downs. In that case, the fatal assumption is that the training data set is consistent with the data distribution that has not occurred in the future. However, the natural world will not let us know whether the subsequent data distribution will change. Because of this, even if researchers add a moving window to the training process, it is inevitable that "machine learning obstacles-prediction delay" will occur. Our method can avoid "machine learning obstacles-prediction delay", We also propose auto trading by deep reinforcement learning. Our new article has the following contributions: 1. Our first contribution is not to make future predictions but to focus on the current "candlesticks pattern detection", such as Engulfing Pattern, Morning Star,.... 2. Our second contribution focuses on detecting trading entry and exit signals combined with related investment strategies.

Traditional ground wireless communication networks cannot provide high-quality services for artificial intelligence (AI) applications such as intelligent transportation systems (ITS) due to deployment, coverage and capacity issues. The space-air-ground integrated network (SAGIN) has become a research focus in the industry. Compared with traditional wireless communication networks, SAGIN is more flexible and reliable, and it has wider coverage and higher quality of seamless connection. However, due to its inherent heterogeneity, time-varying and self-organizing characteristics, the deployment and use of SAGIN still faces huge challenges, among which the orchestration of heterogeneous resources is a key issue. Based on virtual network architecture and deep reinforcement learning (DRL), we model SAGIN's heterogeneous resource orchestration as a multi-domain virtual network embedding (VNE) problem, and propose a SAGIN cross-domain VNE algorithm. We model the different network segments of SAGIN, and set the network attributes according to the actual situation of SAGIN and user needs. In DRL, the agent is acted by a five-layer policy network. We build a feature matrix based on network attributes extracted from SAGIN and use it as the agent training environment. Through training, the probability of each underlying node being embedded can be derived. In test phase, we complete the embedding process of virtual nodes and links in turn based on this probability. Finally, we verify the effectiveness of the algorithm from both training and testing.