Accuracy
Generalizing Constraint Models in Constraint Acquisition
Tsouros, Dimos, Berden, Senne, Prestwich, Steven, Guns, Tias
Constraint Acquisition (CA) aims to widen the use of constraint programming by assisting users in the modeling process. However, most CA methods suffer from a significant drawback: they learn a single set of individual constraints for a specific problem instance, but cannot generalize these constraints to the parameterized constraint specifications of the problem. In this paper, we address this limitation by proposing GenCon, a novel approach to learn parameterized constraint models capable of modeling varying instances of the same problem. To achieve this generalization, we make use of statistical learning techniques at the level of individual constraints. Specifically, we propose to train a classifier to predict, for any possible constraint and parameterization, whether the constraint belongs to the problem. We then show how, for some classes of classifiers, we can extract decision rules to construct interpretable constraint specifications. This enables the generation of ground constraints for any parameter instantiation. Additionally, we present a generate-and-test approach that can be used with any classifier, to generate the ground constraints on the fly. Our empirical results demonstrate that our approach achieves high accuracy and is robust to noise in the input instances.
Predicting Long-Term Student Outcomes from Short-Term EdTech Log Data
Gao, Ge, Leon, Amelia, Jetten, Andrea, Turner, Jasmine, Almoubayyed, Husni, Fancsali, Stephen, Brunskill, Emma
Educational stakeholders are often particularly interested in sparse, delayed student outcomes, like end-of-year statewide exams. The rare occurrence of such assessments makes it harder to identify students likely to fail such assessments, as well as making it slow for researchers and educators to be able to assess the effectiveness of particular educational tools. Prior work has primarily focused on using logs from students full usage (e.g. year-long) of an educational product to predict outcomes, or considered predictive accuracy using a few minutes to predict outcomes after a short (e.g. 1 hour) session. In contrast, we investigate machine learning predictors using students' logs during their first few hours of usage can provide useful predictive insight into those students' end-of-school year external assessment. We do this on three diverse datasets: from students in Uganda using a literacy game product, and from students in the US using two mathematics intelligent tutoring systems. We consider various measures of the accuracy of the resulting predictors, including its ability to identify students at different parts along the assessment performance distribution. Our findings suggest that short-term log usage data, from 2-5 hours, can be used to provide valuable signal about students' long-term external performance.
Measuring, Modeling, and Helping People Account for Privacy Risks in Online Self-Disclosures with AI
Krsek, Isadora, Kabra, Anubha, Dou, Yao, Naous, Tarek, Dabbish, Laura A., Ritter, Alan, Xu, Wei, Das, Sauvik
In pseudonymous online fora like Reddit, the benefits of self-disclosure are often apparent to users (e.g., I can vent about my in-laws to understanding strangers), but the privacy risks are more abstract (e.g., will my partner be able to tell that this is me?). Prior work has sought to develop natural language processing (NLP) tools that help users identify potentially risky self-disclosures in their text, but none have been designed for or evaluated with the users they hope to protect. Absent this assessment, these tools will be limited by the social-technical gap: users need assistive tools that help them make informed decisions, not paternalistic tools that tell them to avoid self-disclosure altogether. To bridge this gap, we conducted a study with N = 21 Reddit users; we had them use a state-of-the-art NLP disclosure detection model on two of their authored posts and asked them questions to understand if and how the model helped, where it fell short, and how it could be improved to help them make more informed decisions. Despite its imperfections, users responded positively to the model and highlighted its use as a tool that can help them catch mistakes, inform them of risks they were unaware of, and encourage self-reflection. However, our work also shows how, to be useful and usable, AI for supporting privacy decision-making must account for posting context, disclosure norms, and users' lived threat models, and provide explanations that help contextualize detected risks.
MARIA: a Multimodal Transformer Model for Incomplete Healthcare Data
Caruso, Camillo Maria, Soda, Paolo, Guarrasi, Valerio
In healthcare, the integration of multimodal data is pivotal for developing comprehensive diagnostic and predictive models. However, managing missing data remains a significant challenge in real-world applications. We introduce MARIA (Multimodal Attention Resilient to Incomplete datA), a novel transformer-based deep learning model designed to address these challenges through an intermediate fusion strategy. Unlike conventional approaches that depend on imputation, MARIA utilizes a masked self-attention mechanism, which processes only the available data without generating synthetic values. This approach enables it to effectively handle incomplete datasets, enhancing robustness and minimizing biases introduced by imputation methods. We evaluated MARIA against 10 state-of-the-art machine learning and deep learning models across 8 diagnostic and prognostic tasks. The results demonstrate that MARIA outperforms existing methods in terms of performance and resilience to varying levels of data incompleteness, underscoring its potential for critical healthcare applications.
Towards an optimised evaluation of teachers' discourse: The case of engaging messages
High-quality professional development for teachers can facilitate the learning of best teaching practices, which in turn can lead to higher levels of student performance (Borko et al., 2010; Didion et al., 2020; Gore et al., 2021; Hubers et al., 2022; Schelling & Rubenstein, 2023). For instance, feedback on actual practices has proven effective in enhancing teaching methods and subsequently improving student outcomes (Allen et al., 2011; Gregory et al., 2017), even among students not directly taught by the teachers receiving the feedback (Opper, 2019). Thus, focusing on the evaluation of teaching practices to facilitate professional development is essential, as it can lead to improved teaching methods and ultimately to higher levels of student outcomes. Despite its acknowledged importance and the pressures from high-stakes accountability systems, most professional development opportunities remain fragmented and insufficient to meet teachers' needs (Borko, 2004; Hsu & Malkin, 2013). The reason for this may be that, although it is known that teaching practices such as cognitive activation, supportive climate, and classroom management, are relevant for enhancing teaching quality and student outcomes (Xie & Derakhshan, 2021), these dimensions may be too abstract or general, which can hinder the implementation of concrete actions to improve teaching quality. In this regard, evidence suggests that targeting more specific factors for intervention, rather than abstract ones, allows teachers to better understand and change their practices (Soderberg et al., 2015).
FROC: Building Fair ROC from a Trained Classifier
Vummintala, Avyukta Manjunatha, Das, Shantanu, Gujar, Sujit
This paper considers the problem of fair probabilistic binary classification with binary protected groups. The classifier assigns scores, and a practitioner predicts labels using a certain cut-off threshold based on the desired trade-off between false positives vs. false negatives. It derives these thresholds from the ROC of the classifier. The resultant classifier may be unfair to one of the two protected groups in the dataset. It is desirable that no matter what threshold the practitioner uses, the classifier should be fair to both the protected groups; that is, the $\mathcal{L}_p$ norm between FPRs and TPRs of both the protected groups should be at most $\varepsilon$. We call such fairness on ROCs of both the protected attributes $\varepsilon_p$-Equalized ROC. Given a classifier not satisfying $\varepsilon_1$-Equalized ROC, we aim to design a post-processing method to transform the given (potentially unfair) classifier's output (score) to a suitable randomized yet fair classifier. That is, the resultant classifier must satisfy $\varepsilon_1$-Equalized ROC. First, we introduce a threshold query model on the ROC curves for each protected group. The resulting classifier is bound to face a reduction in AUC. With the proposed query model, we provide a rigorous theoretical analysis of the minimal AUC loss to achieve $\varepsilon_1$-Equalized ROC. To achieve this, we design a linear time algorithm, namely \texttt{FROC}, to transform a given classifier's output to a probabilistic classifier that satisfies $\varepsilon_1$-Equalized ROC. We prove that under certain theoretical conditions, \texttt{FROC}\ achieves the theoretical optimal guarantees. We also study the performance of our \texttt{FROC}\ on multiple real-world datasets with many trained classifiers.
Advances in Artificial Intelligence forDiabetes Prediction: Insights from a Systematic Literature Review
Khokhar, Pir Bakhsh, Gravino, Carmine, Palomba, Fabio
This systematic review explores the use of machine learning (ML) in predicting diabetes, focusing on datasets, algorithms, training methods, and evaluation metrics. It examines datasets like the Singapore National Diabetic Retinopathy Screening program, REPLACE-BG, National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, and Pima Indians Diabetes Database. The review assesses the performance of ML algorithms like CNN, SVM, Logistic Regression, and XGBoost in predicting diabetes outcomes. The study emphasizes the importance of interdisciplinary collaboration and ethical considerations in ML-based diabetes prediction models.
Pitfalls of topology-aware image segmentation
Berger, Alexander H., Lux, Laurin, Weers, Alexander, Menten, Martin, Rueckert, Daniel, Paetzold, Johannes C.
Topological correctness, i.e., the preservation of structural integrity and specific characteristics of shape, is a fundamental requirement for medical imaging tasks, such as neuron or vessel segmentation. Despite the recent surge in topology-aware methods addressing this challenge, their real-world applicability is hindered by flawed benchmarking practices. In this paper, we identify critical pitfalls in model evaluation that include inadequate connectivity choices, overlooked topological artifacts in ground truth annotations, and inappropriate use of evaluation metrics. Through detailed empirical analysis, we uncover these issues' profound impact on the evaluation and ranking of segmentation methods. Drawing from our findings, we propose a set of actionable recommendations to establish fair and robust evaluation standards for topology-aware medical image segmentation methods.
Beyond Dataset Creation: Critical View of Annotation Variation and Bias Probing of a Dataset for Online Radical Content Detection
Riabi, Arij, Mouilleron, Virginie, Mahamdi, Menel, Antoun, Wissam, Seddah, Djamé
The proliferation of radical content on online platforms poses significant risks, including inciting violence and spreading extremist ideologies. Despite ongoing research, existing datasets and models often fail to address the complexities of multilingual and diverse data. To bridge this gap, we introduce a publicly available multilingual dataset annotated with radicalization levels, calls for action, and named entities in English, French, and Arabic. This dataset is pseudonymized to protect individual privacy while preserving contextual information. Beyond presenting our freely available dataset, we analyze the annotation process, highlighting biases and disagreements among annotators and their implications for model performance. Additionally, we use synthetic data to investigate the influence of socio-demographic traits on annotation patterns and model predictions. Our work offers a comprehensive examination of the challenges and opportunities in building robust datasets for radical content detection, emphasizing the importance of fairness and transparency in model development.
SoK: Watermarking for AI-Generated Content
Zhao, Xuandong, Gunn, Sam, Christ, Miranda, Fairoze, Jaiden, Fabrega, Andres, Carlini, Nicholas, Garg, Sanjam, Hong, Sanghyun, Nasr, Milad, Tramer, Florian, Jha, Somesh, Li, Lei, Wang, Yu-Xiang, Song, Dawn
As the outputs of generative AI (GenAI) techniques improve in quality, it becomes increasingly challenging to distinguish them from human-created content. Watermarking schemes are a promising approach to address the problem of distinguishing between AI and human-generated content. These schemes embed hidden signals within AI-generated content to enable reliable detection. While watermarking is not a silver bullet for addressing all risks associated with GenAI, it can play a crucial role in enhancing AI safety and trustworthiness by combating misinformation and deception. This paper presents a comprehensive overview of watermarking techniques for GenAI, beginning with the need for watermarking from historical and regulatory perspectives. We formalize the definitions and desired properties of watermarking schemes and examine the key objectives and threat models for existing approaches. Practical evaluation strategies are also explored, providing insights into the development of robust watermarking techniques capable of resisting various attacks. Additionally, we review recent representative works, highlight open challenges, and discuss potential directions for this emerging field. By offering a thorough understanding of watermarking in GenAI, this work aims to guide researchers in advancing watermarking methods and applications, and support policymakers in addressing the broader implications of GenAI.