Last month I wrote an article describing the interfaces and capabilities of Microsoft and IBM's new cloud data science products. I observed that Azure ML presents a user-friendly drag and drop data mining app for businesses, while Watson Analytics focuses on natural language queries but is still too nascent for use. A similar query for "IBM Watson Analytics" turns up 730,000 documents. Amid the deluge of coverage on both services, one could lose sight of the many upstart companies offering cloud machine learning services. However, new product categories are typically pioneered by startups.

Higher-level cognition includes logical reasoning and the ability of question answering with common sense. The RatioLog project addresses the problem of rational reasoning in deep question answering by methods from automated deduction and cognitive computing. In a first phase, we combine techniques from information retrieval and machine learning to find appropriate answer candidates from the huge amount of text in the German version of the free encyclopedia "Wikipedia". In a second phase, an automated theorem prover tries to verify the answer candidates on the basis of their logical representations. In a third phase - because the knowledge may be incomplete and inconsistent -, we consider extensions of logical reasoning to improve the results. In this context, we work toward the application of techniques from human reasoning: We employ defeasible reasoning to compare the answers w.r.t. specificity, deontic logic, normative reasoning, and model construction. Moreover, we use integrated case-based reasoning and machine learning techniques on the basis of the semantic structure of the questions and answer candidates to learn giving the right answers.

In cooperation with the Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence (AAAI), the Twenty-Second International Conference on Case-Based Reasoning (ICCBR), the premier international meeting on research and applications in case-based reasoning (CBR), was held from Monday September 29 to Wednesday October 1, 2014, in Cork, Ireland. ICCBR is the annual meeting of the CBR community and the leading conference on this topic. Started in 1993 as the European Conference on CBR and 1995 as ICCBR, the two conferences alternated biennially until their merger in 2010.

ICCBR is the annual meeting of the CBR community and the leading conference on this topic. Started in 1993 as the European Conference on CBR and 1995 as ICCBR, the two conferences alternated biennially until their merger in 2010. The main conference track featured 19 research paper presentations, 16 posters, and two invited speakers. The papers and posters reflected the state of the art of case-based reasoning, dealing both with open problems at the core of casebased reasoning (especially in similarity assessment, case adaptation, and case-based maintenance), as well as trending applications of CBR. Minor, Goethe University, Germany, and Emmanuel The first invited speaker, Tony Veale from University Nauer, LORIA, France.

We propose an approach that allows a robot to evaluate its trustworthiness and adapt its behavior accordingly. The The addition of a robot to a team can be difficult if trust estimate, which we refer to as an inverse trust estimate, the human teammates do not trust the robot. This differs from traditional computational trust metrics in that it can result in underutilization or disuse of the robot, measures how much trust other agents have in the robot rather even if the robot has skills or abilities that are necessary than how much trust the robot has in other agents. Since the to achieve team goals or reduce risk. To robot can only use observable information and not information help a robot integrate itself with a human team, we that is internal to the teammates' reasoning, the inverse present an agent algorithm that allows a robot to estimate trust estimate relies on evaluating the standard interactions its trustworthiness and adapt its behavior accordingly.

The performance of trust models highly depend on the characteristics of the environments where they are applied. Thus, it becomes challenging to choose a suitable trust model for a given e-marketplace environment, especially when ground truth about the agent (buyer and seller) behavior is unknown (called unknown environment). We propose a case-based reasoning framework to choose suitable trust models for unknown environments, based on the intuition that if a trust model performs well in one environment, it will do so in another similar environment. Firstly, we build a case base with a number of simulated environments (with known ground truth) along with the trust models most suitable for each of them. Given an unknown environment, case-based retrieval algorithms retrieve the most similar case(s), and the trust model of the most similar case(s) is chosen as the most suitable model for the unknown environment. Evaluation results confirm the effectiveness of our framework in choosing suitable trust models for different e-marketplace environments.

Identifying a patient’s important medical problems requires broad and deep medical expertise, as well as significant time to gather all the relevant facts from the patient’s medical record and assess the clinical importance of the facts in reaching the final conclusion. A patient’s medical problem list is by far the most critical information that a physician uses in treatment and care of a patient. In spite of its critical role, its curation, manual or automated, has been an unmet need in clinical practice. We developed a machine learning technique in IBM Watson to automatically generate a patient’s medical problem list. The machine learning model uses lexical and medical features extracted from a patient’s record using NLP techniques. We show that the automated method achieves 70% recall and 67% precision based on the gold standard that medical experts created on a set of de-identified patient records from a major hospital system in the US. To the best of our knowledge this is the first successful machine learning/NLP method of extracting an open-ended patient’s medical problems from an Electronic Medical Record (EMR). This paper also contributes a methodology for assessing accuracy of a medical problem list generation technique.

We present the Bayesian Case Model (BCM), a general framework for Bayesian case-based reasoning (CBR) and prototype classification and clustering. BCM brings the intuitive power of CBR to a Bayesian generative framework. The BCM learns prototypes, the "quintessential" observations that best represent clusters in a dataset, by performing joint inference on cluster labels, prototypes and important features. Simultaneously, BCM pursues sparsity by learning subspaces, the sets of features that play important roles in the characterization of the prototypes. The prototype and subspace representation provides quantitative benefits in interpretability while preserving classification accuracy. Human subject experiments verify statistically significant improvements to participants' understanding when using explanations produced by BCM, compared to those given by prior art.

In either view, typical examples are closer where (only) positive examples ought to exceptional cases, case memory, analogy, to the prototype, and atypical examples and be.

In this paper we discuss a hybrid approach combining Case-Based Reasoning (CBR) .