The random coefficient logistic demand model of Berry et al. (1995) (henceforth BLP) has been a workhorse of the New Empirical Industrial Organization literature, allowing for varied substitution patterns across products, and accounting for endogeneity of price. The reliability of its estimation has been the subject of rigorous debate (Nevo, 2000; Conlon and Gortmaker, 2020; Knittel and Metaxoglou, 2014), and the estimator itself has been the study of many proposed advances in econometric techniques as a sophisticated yet widely used structural model (Hong et al., 2020; Forneron and Ng, 2020). The most common implementation of the BLP estimator involves the use of a nested fixed point (NFP) as an inner loop within an outer loop of GMM estimation, although we acknowledge the Mathematical Programming with Equilibrium Constraints (MPEC) approach of Dubé et al. (2012), which is beyond the scope of this paper. Dubé et al. (2012) and Conlon and Gortmaker (2020) find that derivative-free optimization algorithms such as the Nelder-Meade or simplex algorithms often fail to converge or converge to the wrong solution. As such, the literature has settled on the use of analytical derivatives with a derivative-based optimization algorithm such as L-BFGS. Nevo (2000) provides the analytical derivative for demand-only (DO) BLP in detail, and Conlon and Gortmaker (2020) indicate that the same is possible for demand-and-supply (DS) BLP, although it involves tensor products.

Although deep learning models have driven state-of-the-art performance on a wide array of tasks, they are prone to learning spurious correlations that should not be learned as predictive clues. To mitigate this problem, we propose a causality-based training framework to reduce the spurious correlations caused by observable confounders. We give theoretical analysis on the underlying general Structural Causal Model (SCM) and propose to perform Maximum Likelihood Estimation (MLE) on the interventional distribution instead of the observational distribution, namely Counterfactual Maximum Likelihood Estimation (CMLE). As the interventional distribution, in general, is hidden from the observational data, we then derive two different upper bounds of the expected negative log-likelihood and propose two general algorithms, Implicit CMLE and Explicit CMLE, for causal predictions of deep learning models using observational data. We conduct experiments on two real-world tasks: Natural Language Inference (NLI) and Image Captioning. The results show that CMLE methods outperform the regular MLE method in terms of out-of-domain generalization performance and reducing spurious correlations, while maintaining comparable performance on the regular evaluations.

In this paper, we investigate the question: Given a small number of datapoints, for example N = 30, how tight can PAC-Bayes and test set bounds be made? For such small datasets, test set bounds adversely affect generalisation performance by discarding data. In this setting, PAC-Bayes bounds are especially attractive, due to their ability to use all the data to simultaneously learn a posterior and bound its generalisation risk. We focus on the case of i.i.d. data with a bounded loss and consider the generic PAC-Bayes theorem of Germain et al. (2009) and Begin et al. (2016). While their theorem is known to recover many existing PAC-Bayes bounds, it is unclear what the tightest bound derivable from their framework is. Surprisingly, we show that for a fixed learning algorithm and dataset, the tightest bound of this form coincides with the tightest bound of the more restrictive family of bounds considered in Catoni (2007). In contrast, in the more natural case of distributions over datasets, we give examples (both analytic and numerical) showing that the family of bounds in Catoni (2007) can be suboptimal. Within the proof framework of Germain et al. (2009) and Begin et al. (2016), we establish a lower bound on the best bound achievable in expectation, which recovers the Chernoff test set bound in the case when the posterior is equal to the prior. Finally, to illustrate how tight these bounds can potentially be, we study a synthetic one-dimensional classification task in which it is feasible to meta-learn both the prior and the form of the bound to obtain the tightest PAC-Bayes and test set bounds possible. We find that in this simple, controlled scenario, PAC-Bayes bounds are surprisingly competitive with comparable, commonly used Chernoff test set bounds. However, the sharpest test set bounds still lead to better guarantees on the generalisation error than the PAC-Bayes bounds we consider.

While causal models are becoming one of the mainstays of machine learning, the problem of uncertainty quantification in causal inference remains challenging. In this paper, we study the causal data fusion problem, where datasets pertaining to multiple causal graphs are combined to estimate the average treatment effect of a target variable. As data arises from multiple sources and can vary in quality and quantity, principled uncertainty quantification becomes essential. To that end, we introduce Bayesian Interventional Mean Processes, a framework which combines ideas from probabilistic integration and kernel mean embeddings to represent interventional distributions in the reproducing kernel Hilbert space, while taking into account the uncertainty within each causal graph. To demonstrate the utility of our uncertainty estimation, we apply our method to the Causal Bayesian Optimisation task and show improvements over state-of-the-art methods.

Nonuniform subsampling methods are effective to reduce computational burden and maintain estimation efficiency for massive data. Existing methods mostly focus on subsampling with replacement due to its high computational efficiency. If the data volume is so large that nonuniform subsampling probabilities cannot be calculated all at once, then subsampling with replacement is infeasible to implement. This paper solves this problem using Poisson subsampling. We first derive optimal Poisson subsampling probabilities in the context of quasi-likelihood estimation under the A- and L-optimality criteria. For a practically implementable algorithm with approximated optimal subsampling probabilities, we establish the consistency and asymptotic normality of the resultant estimators. To deal with the situation that the full data are stored in different blocks or at multiple locations, we develop a distributed subsampling framework, in which statistics are computed simultaneously on smaller partitions of the full data. Asymptotic properties of the resultant aggregated estimator are investigated. We illustrate and evaluate the proposed strategies through numerical experiments on simulated and real data sets.

Bayesian statistics is a statistical theory based on the Bayesian interpretation of probability. To understand Bayesian Statistics, we need to first understand conditional probability and Bayes' theorem. Conditional probability measures the probability of an event occurring based on the fact that another event has already occurred. Just as the formula below shows, event A occurs given that event B occurred, is the division of the joint probability of event A and B and the probability of event B occurring. There are two notes regarding this formula.

The missing data problem has been broadly studied in the last few decades and has various applications in different areas such as statistics or bioinformatics. Even though many methods have been developed to tackle this challenge, most of those are imputation techniques that require multiple iterations through the data before yielding convergence. In addition, such approaches may introduce extra biases and noises to the estimated parameters. In this work, we propose novel algorithms to find the maximum likelihood estimates (MLEs) for a one-class/multiple-class randomly missing data set under some mild assumptions. As the computation is direct without any imputation, our algorithms do not require multiple iterations through the data, thus promising to be less time-consuming than other methods while maintaining superior estimation performance. We validate these claims by empirical results on various data sets of different sizes and release all codes in a GitHub repository to contribute to the research community related to this problem.

The shortcomings of maximum likelihood estimation in the context of model-based reinforcement learning have been highlighted by an increasing number of papers. When the model class is misspecified or has a limited representational capacity, model parameters with high likelihood might not necessarily result in high performance of the agent on a downstream control task. To alleviate this problem, we propose an end-to-end approach for model learning which directly optimizes the expected returns using implicit differentiation. We treat a value function that satisfies the Bellman optimality operator induced by the model as an implicit function of model parameters and show how to differentiate the function. We provide theoretical and empirical evidence highlighting the benefits of our approach in the model misspecification regime compared to likelihood-based methods.

In this article, we'll talk about Microsoft AI, the pathway to learn for beginners who are curious to explore the Microsoft AI Platforms, various functionalities and features supported by Machine Learning Studio in Azure, and the processes to train and better the Machine Learning Models with Azure. We also learn about different algorithms and thus gain the overall knowledge to get started and work with Microsoft Azure AI. Check out the official website of the summit to register as an attendee or to be a speaker and share your knowledge with the community. Microsoft AI is a powerful framework that enables organizations, researchers, and non-profits to use AI technologies with its powerful framework which offers services and features across domains of Machine Learning, Robotics, Data Science, IoT, and many more. One of the advantages of Azure can be realized with this example of how Machine Learning becomes more scalable in the Cloud even while working on Notebooks.

In this chapter, we investigate whether unique, optimal decision boundaries can be found. In order to do so, we first have to revisit several fundamental mathematical principles. Regularization is a mathematical tool, which allows us to find unique solutions even for highly ill-posed problems. In order to use this trick, we review norms and how they can be used to steer regression problems. Rosenblatt's Perceptron and Multi-Layer Perceptrons which are also called Artificial Neural Networks inherently suffer from this ill-posedness.