Entity linking maps name mentions in the documents to entries in a knowledge base through resolving the name variations and ambiguities. In this paper, we propose three advancements for entity linking. Firstly, expanding acronyms can effectively reduce the ambiguity of the acronym mentions. However, only rule-based approaches relying heavily on the presence of text markers have been used for entity linking. In this paper, we propose a supervised learning algorithm to expand more complicated acronyms encountered, which leads to 15.1% accuracy improvement over state-of-the-art acronym expansion methods. Secondly, as entity linking annotation is expensive and labor intensive, to automate the annotation process without compromise of accuracy, we propose an instance selection strategy to effectively utilize the automatically generated annotation. In our selection strategy, an informative and diverse set of instances are selected for effective disambiguation. Lastly, topic modeling is used to model the semantic topics of the articles. These advancements give statistical significant improvement to entity linking individually. Collectively they lead the highest performance on KBP-2010 task.

Trained on the imbalanced labeled data, most classification Various semi-supervised learning methods have algorithms tend to predict test samples as the majority class been proposed recently to solve the longstanding and may ignore the minority class. Although many methods, shortage problem of manually labeled data in sentiment such as re-sampling [Chawla et al., 2002], one-class classification classification. However, most existing studies [Juszczak and Duin, 2003], and cost-sensitive assume the balance between negative and positive learning [Zhou and Liu, 2006], have been proposed to solve samples in both the labeled and unlabeled data, this issue, it is still unclear as to which method is more which may not be true in reality. In this paper, we suitable to handle the imbalanced problem in sentiment investigate a more common case of semi-supervised classification and whether the method is extendable to learning for imbalanced sentiment classification.

Machine learning is traditionally formalized and researched as the study of learning concepts and decision functions from labeled examples, requiring a representation that encodes information about the domain of the decision function to be learned. We are interested in providing a way for a human teacher to interact with an automated learner using natural instructions, thus allowing the teacher to communicate the relevant domain expertise to the learner without necessarily knowing anything about the internal representations used in the learning process. In this paper we suggest to view the process of learning a decision function as a natural language lesson interpretation problem instead of learning from labeled examples. This interpretation of machine learning is motivated by human learning processes, in which the learner is given a lesson describing the target concept directly, and a few instances exemplifying it. We introduce a learning algorithm for the lesson interpretation problem that gets feedback from its performance on the final task, while learning jointly (1) how to interpret the lesson and (2) how to use this interpretation to do well on the final task. his approach alleviates the supervision burden of traditional machine learning by focusing on supplying the learner with only human-level task expertise for learning. We evaluate our approach by applying it to the rules of the Freecell solitaire card game. We show that our learning approach can eventually use natural language instructions to learn the target concept and play the game legally. Furthermore, we show that the learned semantic interpreter also generalizes to previously unseen instructions.

In the aviation safety research domain, cause identification refers to the task of identifying the possible causes responsible for the incident describedin an aviation safety incident report. This task presents a number of challenges, including the scarcity of labeled data and the difficulties in finding the relevant portions of the text. We investigate the use of annotator rationales to overcome these challenges, proposing several new ways of utilizing rationales and showing that through judicious use of the rationales, it is possible to achieve significant improvement over a unigram SVM baseline.

During the design of a microprocessor, Design Space Exploration (DSE) is a critical step which determines the appropriate design configuration of the microprocessor. In the computer architecture community, supervised learning techniques have been applied to DSE to build models for predicting the qualities of design configurations. For supervised learning, however, considerable simulation costs are required for attaining the labeled design configurations. Given limited resources, it is difficult to achieve high accuracy. In this paper, inspired by recent advances in semi-supervised learning, we propose the COMT approach which can exploit unlabeled design configurations to improve the models. In addition to an improved predictive accuracy, COMT is able to guide the design of microprocessors, owing to the use of comprehensible model trees. Empirical study demonstrates that COMT significantly outperforms state-of-the-art DSE technique through reducing mean squared error by 30% to 84%, and thus, promising architectures can be attained more efficiently.

Multi-label learning deals with the problem where each training example is represented by a single instance while associated with a set of class labels. For an unseen example, existing approaches choose to determine the membership of each possible class label to it based on identical feature set, i.e. the very instance representation of the unseen example is employed in the discrimination processes of all labels. However, this commonly-used strategy might be suboptimal as different class labels usually carry specific characteristics of their own, and it could be beneficial to exploit different feature sets for the discrimination of different labels. Based on the above reflection, we propose a new strategy to multi-label learning by leveraging label-specific features, where a simple yet effective algorithm named LIFT is presented. Briefly, LIFT constructs features specific to each label by conducting clustering analysis on its positive and negative instances, and then performs training and testing by querying the clustering results. Extensive experiments across sixteen diversified data sets clearly validate the superiority of LIFT against other well-established multi-label learning algorithms.

Learning to rank has received great attention in recent years as it plays a crucial role in information retrieval. The existing concept of learning to rank assumes that each training sample is associated with an instance and a reliable label. However, in practice, this assumption does not necessarily hold true. This study focuses on the learning to rank when each training instance is labeled by multiple annotators that may be unreliable. In such a scenario, no accurate labels can be obtained. This study proposes two learning approaches. One is to simply estimate the ground truth first and then to learn a ranking model with it. The second approach is a maximum likelihood learning approach which estimates the ground truth and learns the ranking model iteratively. The two approaches have been tested on both synthetic and real-world data. The results reveal that the maximum likelihood approach outperforms the first approach significantly and is comparable of achieving results with the learning model considering reliable labels. Further more, both the approaches have been applied for ranking the Web visual clutter.

In many real-world applications of the time series classification problem, not only could the negative training instances be missing, the number of positive instances available for learning may also be rather limited. This has motivated the development of new classification algorithms that can learn from a small set P of labeled seed positive instances augmented with a set U of unlabeled instances (i.e. PU learning algorithms). However, existing PU learning algorithms for time series classification have less than satisfactory performance as they are unable to identify the class boundary between positive and negative instances accurately. In this paper, we propose a novel PU learning algorithm LCLC (Learning from Common Local Clusters) for time series classification. LCLC is designed to effectively identify the ground truths’ positive and negative boundaries, resulting in more accurate classifiers than those constructed using existing methods. We have applied LCLC to classify time series data from different application domains; the experimental results demonstrate that LCLC outperforms existing methods significantly.

Imitation learning refers to the problem of learning how to behave by observinga teacher in action. We consider imitation learning in relational domains, in which there is a varying number of objects and relations among them. In prior work, simple relational policies are learned by viewing imitation learning as supervised learning of a function from states to actions. For propositional worlds, functional gradient methods have been proved to be beneficial. They are simpler to implement than most existing methods, more efficient, more naturally satisfy common constraints on the cost function, and better represent our prior beliefs about the form of the function. Building on recent generalizations of functional gradient boosting to relational representations, we implement a functional gradient boosting approach to imitation learning in relational domains. In particular, given a set of traces from the human teacher, our system learns a policy in the form of a set of relational regression trees that additively approximate the functional gradients. The use of multiple additive trees combined with relational representation allows for learning more expressive policies than what has been done before. We demonstrate the usefulness of our approach in several different domains.

Learning from Demonstration (LfD) is a popular technique for building decision-making agents from human help. Traditional LfD methods use demonstrations as training examples for supervised learning, but complex tasks can require more examples than is practical to obtain. We present Abstraction from Demonstration (AfD), a novel form of LfD that uses demonstrations to infer state abstractions and reinforcement learning (RL) methods in those abstract state spaces to build a policy. Empirical results show that AfD is greater than an order of magnitude more sample efficient than jus tusing demonstrations as training examples, and exponentially faster than RL alone.