Preprint submitted to RGN Publications on 21 /5/2018 Abstract The credit cards' fraud transactions detection is the important problem in machine learning field. To detect the credit cards' fraud transactions help reduce the significant loss of the credit cards' holders and the banks. To detect the credit cards' fraud transactions, data scientists normally employ the un - supervised learning techniques and supervised learning technique. In this paper, we employ the graph p - Laplacian based semi - supervised learning methods combi ned with the under - sampling technique such as Cluster Centroids to solve the credit cards' fraud transactions detection problem. Experimental results show that that the graph p - Laplacian semi - supervised learning method s outper form the current state of art graph Laplacian based semi - supervised learning method ( p 2). 2010 AMS Classi fi cation: 05C85 Keywords and phrases: graph p - Laplacian, credit card, fraud detection, semi - supervised learning Article type: Research article 1 Introduction While purchasing online, the transactions can be done by using credit cards that are issued by the bank.

Generating paraphrases from given sentences involves decoding words step by step from a large vocabulary. To learn a decoder, supervised learning which maximizes the likelihood of tokens always suffers from the exposure bias. Although both reinforcement learning (RL) and imitation learning (IL) have been widely used to alleviate the bias, the lack of direct comparison leads to only a partial image on their benefits. In this work, we present an empirical study on how RL and IL can help boost the performance of generating paraphrases, with the pointer-generator as a base model. Experiments on the benchmark datasets show that (1) imitation learning is constantly better than reinforcement learning; and (2) the pointer-generator models with imitation learning outperform the state-of-the-art methods with a large margin.

Amazon SageMaker is a fully-managed, modular machine learning (ML) service that enables developers and data scientists to easily build, train, and deploy models at any scale. With a choice of using built-in algorithms, bringing your own, or choosing from algorithms available in AWS Marketplace, it's never been easier and faster to get ML models from experimentation to scale-out production. One of the key benefits of Amazon SageMaker is that it frees you of any infrastructure management, no matter the scale you're working at. For instance, instead of having to set up and manage complex training clusters, you simply tell Amazon SageMaker which Amazon Elastic Compute Cloud (EC2) instance type to use, and how many you need: the appropriate instances are then created on-demand, configured, and terminated automatically once the training job is complete. As customers have quickly understood, this means that they will never pay for idle training instances, a simple way to keep costs under control.

Image modality recognition is essential for efficient imaging workflows in current clinical environments, where multiple imaging modalities are used to better comprehend complex diseases. Emerging biomarkers from novel, rare modalities are being developed to aid in such understanding, however the availability of these images is often limited. This scenario raises the necessity of recognising new imaging modalities without them being collected and annotated in large amounts. In this work, we present a few-shot learning model for limited training examples based on Deep Triplet Networks. We show that the proposed model is more accurate in distinguishing different modalities than a traditional Convolutional Neural Network classifier when limited samples are available. Furthermore, we evaluate the performance of both classifiers when presented with noisy samples and provide an initial inspection of how the proposed model can incorporate measures of uncertainty to be more robust against out-of-sample examples.

Semi-supervised learning is a setting in which one has labeled and unlabeled data available. In this survey we explore different types of theoretical results when one uses unlabeled data in classification and regression tasks. Most methods that use unlabeled data rely on certain assumptions about the data distribution. When those assumptions are not met in reality, including unlabeled data may actually decrease performance. Studying such methods, it therefore is particularly important to have an understanding of the underlying theory. In this review we gather results about the possible gains one can achieve when using semi-supervised learning as well as results about the limits of such methods. More precisely, this review collects the answers to the following questions: What are, in terms of improving supervised methods, the limits of semi-supervised learning? What are the assumptions of different methods? What can we achieve if the assumptions are true? Finally, we also discuss the biggest bottleneck of semi-supervised learning, namely the assumptions they make.

This work is a study of the impact of multiple aspects in a classic unsupervised word sense disambiguation algorithm. We identify relevant factors in a decision rule algorithm, including the initial labeling of examples, the formalization of the rule confidence, and the criteria for accepting a decision rule. Some of these factors are only implicitly considered in the original literature. We then propose a lightly supervised version of the algorithm, and employ a pseudo-word-based strategy to evaluate the impact of these factors. The obtained performances are comparable with those of highly optimized formulations of the word sense disambiguation method.

BERT model has been successfully applied to open-domain QA tasks. However, previous work trains BERT by viewing passages corresponding to the same question as independent training instances, which may cause incomparable scores for answers from different passages. To tackle this issue, we propose a multi-passage BERT model to globally normalize answer scores across all passages of the same question, and this change enables our QA model find better answers by utilizing more passages. In addition, we find that splitting articles into passages with the length of 100 words by sliding window improves performance by 4%. By leveraging a passage ranker to select high-quality passages, multi-passage BERT gains additional 2%. Experiments on four standard benchmarks showed that our multi-passage BERT outperforms all state-of-the-art models on all benchmarks.

The lack of adequate training data is one of the major hurdles in WiFi-based activity recognition systems. In this paper, we propose Wi-Fringe, which is a WiFi CSI-based device-free human gesture recognition system that recognizes named gestures, i.e., activities and gestures that have a semantically meaningful name in English language, as opposed to arbitrary free-form gestures. Given a list of activities (only their names in English text), along with zero or more training examples (WiFi CSI values) per activity, Wi-Fringe is able to detect all activities at runtime. In other words, a subset of activities that Wi-Fringe detects do not require any training examples at all.

Supervised learning algorithms trained on medical images will often fail to generalize across changes in acquisition parameters. Recent work in domain adaptation addresses this challenge and successfully leverages labeled data in a source domain to perform well on an unlabeled target domain. Inspired by recent work in semi-supervised learning we introduce a novel method to adapt from one source domain to $n$ target domains (as long as there is paired data covering all domains). Our multi-domain adaptation method utilises a consistency loss combined with adversarial learning. We provide results on white matter lesion hyperintensity segmentation from brain MRIs using the MICCAI 2017 challenge data as the source domain and two target domains. The proposed method significantly outperforms other domain adaptation baselines.

Active learning (AL) is a widely-used training strategy for maximizing predictive performance subject to a fixed annotation budget. In AL one iteratively selects training examples for annotation, often those for which the current model is most uncertain (by some measure). The hope is that active sampling leads to better performance than would be achieved under independent and identically distributed (i.i.d.) random samples. While AL has shown promise in retrospective evaluations, these studies often ignore practical obstacles to its use. In this paper we show that while AL may provide benefits when used with specific models and for particular domains, the benefits of current approaches do not generalize reliably across models and tasks. This is problematic because in practice one does not have the opportunity to explore and compare alternative AL strategies. Moreover, AL couples the training dataset with the model used to guide its acquisition. We find that subsequently training a successor model with an actively-acquired dataset does not consistently outperform training on i.i.d. sampled data. Our findings raise the question of whether the downsides inherent to AL are worth the modest and inconsistent performance gains it tends to afford.