References are to text of chapters, not to the bodies of bibliographies.

A new predicate calculus deduction system based on production rules is proposed. The system combines several developments in Artificial Intelligence and Automatic Theorem Proving research including the use of domain-specific inference rules and separate mechanisms for forward and backward reasoning. It has a clean separation between the data base, the production rules, and the control system. Goals and subgoals are maintained in an AND/OR tree structure. We introduce here a structure that is the dual of the AND/OR tree to represent assertions. The production rules modify these structures until they "connect" in a fashion that proves the goal theorem. Unlike some previous systems that used production rules, ours is not limited to rules in Horn Clause form. Unlike previous PLANNER-like systems, ours can handle the full range of predicate calculus expressions including those with quantified variables, disjunctions, and negations.

For the past ten years we have been working on the problem of getting a computer to understand natural language.

Distributed systems are multi-processor information processing systems which do not rely on the central shared memory for communication. The importance of distributed systems has been growing with the advent of "computer networks" of a wide spectrum: networks of geographically distributed computers at one end, and tightly coupled systems built with a large number of inexpensive physical processors at the other end. Both kinds of distributed system are made available by the rapid progress in the technology of large-scale integrated circuits. Yet little has been done in the research on semantics and programming methodologies for distributed information processing systems. Our main research goal is to understand and describe the behaviour of such distributed systems in seeking the maximum benefit of employing multi-processor computation schemata.

Success of a knowledge-based program depends on both competence and acceptability. It must perform well for it to be worth using, but is must be acceptable to users for it to be used. There are many dimensions to developing competent and acceptable knowledge based systems which can serve as "intelligent assistants" for problem solvers in science (see Shortliffe and Davis, 1975). One of these is the old AI problem of representation of knowledge. Since most previous work on representation has stressed its importance for problem-solving (e.g.

A model for adaptive problem solving applied to natural language acquisition.

A program called "AM" is described which carries on simple mathematics research, defining and studying new concepts under the guidance of a large body of heuristic rules. The 250 heuristics communicate via an agenda mechanism, a global priority queue of small tasks for the program to perform, and reasons why each task is plausible (for example, "Find generalizations of'primes', because'primes' turned out to be so useful a concept"). Each concept is represented as an active, structured knowledge module. One hundred very incomplete modules are initially supplied, each one corresponding to an elementary set-theoretic concept (for example, union). This provides a definite but immense space which AM begins to explore.

The two favoured theoretical bases for languages have been lambda calculus as advocated by Landin and others, and predicate calculus as advocated by Kowalski (see Landin (1966) and Kowalski (1973)). In this paper I adopt an approach based on predicate calculus, but in a manner that differs from the existing PROLOG language (Warren 1975 and Battani & Meloni 1973) in that I adopt a "forward inference" approach -- inferring conclusions from premises, rather than the "backward inference" approach of PROLOG, which starts with a desired conclusion and tries to find ways of inferring it. This difference is reflected in the internal structure of the associated implementations, that of PROLOG being a "backtrack search" kind of implementation, while the most obvious implementation of the system proposed here involves a kind of mass operation on tables of data, reminiscent of APL (Iverson 1962) but in fact identical in many respects with the work of Codd (Codd 1970) on relational data bases. Indeed, from one perspective this paper can be seen as an extension of Codd's work into the realm of general purpose computing. As in the case of PROLOG it is necessary for the user of the relational programming system to make statements which are not associated with the logical structure of the problem, but reflect the need to control the computation. In PROLOG these are effected by the use of extra-logical control primitives, but in our system control is exercised by the introduction of predicates for that purpose, which have exactly the same semantics as the predicates relevant to the logical structure of the problem. In later sections I deal with the problem of introducing equality into the system, in a way that reflects the normal mathematical usage of equality.

J. Do RAN 433 22 Chromosome classification and segmentation as exercises in knowing what to expect.

J. Do RAN 433 22 Chromosome classification and segmentation as exercises in knowing what to expect.