Law
Supplementary Material Infer Induced Sentiment of Comment Response to Video: A New Task, Dataset and Baseline Qi Jia 1 Baoyu Fan 2,1 Cong Xu1 Lu Liu
This section provides a comprehensive overview of the CSMV dataset. This extensive time range allows for the inclusion of a diverse set of content, capturing the evolution of sentiments over the course of more than two years. The distribution of labels in our CSMV dataset is shown in Figure 1. In Figure 1a, the opinion labels are distributed as follows: positive - 47%, neutral - 42%, and negative - 11%. Negative comments are clearly in the minority.
Google Search Could Change Forever in the UK
Google may be forced to make major changes in the way that people use its search engine in the UK. Google may have to change the way its search engine works in the UK, including potentially offering users the option to choose rival search services, as part of new regulation from the UK's competition authority. In a decision handed down on Friday, the Competition and Markets Authority (CMA) has designated Google Search with Strategic Market Status (SMS)--a qualifier given to companies that are considered to have "substantial and entrenched market power"--which would allow the regulator to wield more power over it. This decision follows a 10-month investigation into Google, and it is the first time that these powers, which come under the UK's new Digital Markets, Competition and Consumers Act, have been used to target a major tech company. Google's SMS will last up to five years under this legislation.
Supplementary File for ConvBench: A Multi-Turn Conversation Evaluation Benchmark with Hierarchical Evaluation Capability for Large Vision-Language Models
We calculate the agreement of human judgment and our automatic evaluation (i.e., ConvBenchEval()) and find it reaches 81.83% (seeing Table 3 - 6 for detailed agreement of each turn of overall). It demonstrates the effectiveness of ConvBenchEval(), which uses ChatGPT. The agreement between ChatGPT and GPT4 is very high at 87.38%. It demonstrates that using different LLMs as judges slightly influences the evaluation results. ConvBenchEval() armed with ChatGPT can is reliable and low-cost. From the above tables, we also observe that though GPT4V is expensive and can capture images, its judgment performs worse than GPT4's judgment.