The scenario approach provides a powerful data-driven framework for designing solutions under uncertainty with rigorous probabilistic robustness guarantees. Existing theory, however, primarily addresses assessing robustness with respect to a single appropriateness criterion for the solution based on a dataset, whereas many practical applications - including multi-agent decision problems - require the simultaneous consideration of multiple criteria and the assessment of their robustness based on multiple datasets, one per criterion. This paper develops a general scenario theory for multi-criteria data-driven decision making. A central innovation lies in the collective treatment of the risks associated with violations of individual criteria, which yields substantially more accurate robustness certificates than those derived from a naive application of standard results. In turn, this approach enables a sharper quantification of the robustness level with which all criteria are simultaneously satisfied. The proposed framework applies broadly to multi-criteria data-driven decision problems, providing a principled, scalable, and theoretically grounded methodology for design under uncertainty.

We study the problem of reconstructing the latent geometry of a $d$-dimensional Riemannian manifold from a random geometric graph. While recent works have made significant progress in manifold recovery from random geometric graphs, and more generally from noisy distances, the precision of pairwise distance estimation has been fundamentally constrained by the volumetric barrier, namely the natural sample-spacing scale $n^{-1/d}$ coming from the fact that a generic point of the manifold typically lies at distance of order $n^{-1/d}$ from the nearest sampled point. In this paper, we introduce a novel approach, Orthogonal Ring Distance Estimation Routine (ORDER), which achieves a pointwise distance estimation precision of order $n^{-2/(d+5)}$ up to polylogarithmic factors in $n$ in polynomial time. This strictly beats the volumetric barrier for dimensions $d > 5$. As a consequence of obtaining pointwise precision better than $n^{-1/d}$, we prove that the Gromov--Wasserstein distance between the reconstructed metric measure space and the true latent manifold is of order $n^{-1/d}$. This matches the Wasserstein convergence rate of empirical measures, demonstrating that our reconstructed graph metric is asymptotically as good as having access to the full pairwise distance matrix of the sampled points. Our results are proven in a very general setting which includes general models of noisy pairwise distances, sparse random geometric graphs, and unknown connection probability functions.

Can classifier-based safety gates maintain reliable oversight as AI systems improve over hundreds of iterations? We provide comprehensive empirical evidence that they cannot. On a self-improving neural controller (d=240), eighteen classifier configurations -- spanning MLPs, SVMs, random forests, k-NN, Bayesian classifiers, and deep networks -- all fail the dual conditions for safe self-improvement. Three safe RL baselines (CPO, Lyapunov, safety shielding) also fail. Results extend to MuJoCo benchmarks (Reacher-v4 d=496, Swimmer-v4 d=1408, HalfCheetah-v4 d=1824). At controlled distribution separations up to delta_s=2.0, all classifiers still fail -- including the NP-optimal test and MLPs with 100% training accuracy -- demonstrating structural impossibility. We then show the impossibility is specific to classification, not to safe self-improvement itself. A Lipschitz ball verifier achieves zero false accepts across dimensions d in {84, 240, 768, 2688, 5760, 9984, 17408} using provable analytical bounds (unconditional delta=0). Ball chaining enables unbounded parameter-space traversal: on MuJoCo Reacher-v4, 10 chains yield +4.31 reward improvement with delta=0; on Qwen2.5-7B-Instruct during LoRA fine-tuning, 42 chain transitions traverse 234x the single-ball radius with zero safety violations across 200 steps. A 50-prompt oracle confirms oracle-agnosticity. Compositional per-group verification enables radii up to 37x larger than full-network balls. At d<=17408, delta=0 is unconditional; at LLM scale, conditional on estimated Lipschitz constants.

We study trajectory forecasting under squared loss for time series with weak conditional structure, using highly expressive prediction models. Building on the classical characterization of squared-loss risk minimization, we emphasize regimes in which the conditional expectation of future trajectories is effectively degenerate, leading to trivial Bayes-optimal predictors (flat for prices and zero for returns in standard financial settings). In this regime, increased model expressivity does not improve predictive accuracy but instead introduces spurious trajectory fluctuations around the optimal predictor. These fluctuations arise from the reuse of noise and result in increased prediction variance without any reduction in bias. This provides a process-level explanation for the degradation of Transformerbased forecasts on financial time series. We complement these theoretical results with numerical experiments on high-frequency EUR/USD exchange rate data, analyzing the distribution of trajectory-level forecasting errors. The results show that Transformer-based models yield larger errors than a simple linear benchmark on a large majority of forecasting windows, consistent with the variance-driven mechanism identified by the theory.

Gaussian processes (GPs) offer appealing properties but are costly to train at scale. Sparse variational GP (SVGP) approximations reduce cost yet still rely on Cholesky decompositions of kernel matrices, ill-suited to low-precision, massively parallel hardware. While one can construct valid variational bounds that rely only on matrix multiplications (matmuls) via an auxiliary matrix parameter, optimising them with off-the-shelf first-order methods is challenging. We make the inverse-free approach practical by proposing a better-conditioned bound and deriving a matmul-only natural-gradient update for the auxiliary parameter, markedly improving stability and convergence. We further provide simple heuristics, such as step-size schedules and stopping criteria, that make the overall optimisation routine fit seamlessly into existing workflows. Across regression and classification benchmarks, we demonstrate that our method 1) serves as a drop-in replacement in SVGP-based models (e.g., deep GPs), 2) recovers similar performance to traditional methods, and 3) can be faster than baselines when well tuned.

Estimation of heterogeneous long-term treatment effects (HLTEs) is widely used for personalized decision-making in marketing, economics, and medicine, where short-term randomized experiments are often combined with long-term observational data. However, HLTE estimation is challenging due to limited overlap in treatment or in observing long-term outcomes for certain subpopulations, which can lead to unstable HLTE estimates with large finite-sample variance. To address this challenge, we introduce the LT-O-learners (Long-Term Orthogonal Learners), a set of novel orthogonal learners for HLTE estimation. The learners are designed for the canonical HLTE setting that combines a short-term randomized dataset $\mathcal{D}_1$ with a long-term historical dataset $\mathcal{D}_2$. The key idea of our LT-O-Learners is to retarget the learning objective by introducing custom overlap weights that downweight samples with low overlap in treatment or in long-term observation. We show that the retargeted loss is equivalent to the weighted oracle loss and satisfies Neyman-orthogonality, which means our learners are robust to errors in the nuisance estimation. We further provide a general error bound for the LT-O-Learners and give the conditions under which quasi-oracle rate can be achieved. Finally, our LT-O-learners are model-agnostic and can thus be instantiated with arbitrary machine learning models. We conduct empirical evaluations on synthetic and semi-synthetic benchmarks to confirm the theoretical properties of our LT-O-Learners, especially the robustness in low-overlap settings. To the best of our knowledge, ours are the first orthogonal learners for HLTE estimation that are robust to low overlap that is common in long-term outcomes.

Stochastic natural gradient variational inference (NGVI) is a popular and efficient algorithm for Bayesian inference. Despite empirical success, the convergence of this method is still not fully understood. In this work, we define and study a projected stochastic NGVI when variational distributions form an exponential family. Stochasticity arises when either gradients are intractable expectations or large sums. We prove new non-asymptotic convergence results for combinations of constant or decreasing step sizes and constant or increasing sample/batch sizes. When all hyperparameters are fixed, NGVI is shown to converge geometrically to a neighborhood of the optimum, while we establish convergence to the optimum with rates of the form $\mathcal{O}\left(\frac{1}{T^ρ} \right)$, possibly with $ρ\geq 1$, for all other combinations of step size and sample/batch size schedules. These rates apply when the target posterior distribution is close in some sense to the considered exponential family. Our theoretical results extend existing NGVI and stochastic optimization results and provide more flexibility to adjust, in a principled way, step sizes and sample/batch sizes in order to meet speed, resources, or accuracy constraints.

Statistical inference on large-dimensional tensor data has been extensively studied in the literature and widely used in economics, biology, machine learning, and other fields, but how to generate a structured tensor with a target distribution is still a new problem. As profound AI generators, diffusion models have achieved remarkable success in learning complex distributions. However, their extension to generating multi-linear tensor-valued observations remains underexplored. In this work, we propose a novel Tucker diffusion model for learning high-dimensional tensor distributions. We show that the score function admits a structured decomposition under the low Tucker rank assumption, allowing it to be both accurately approximated and efficiently estimated using a carefully tailored tensor-shaped architecture named Tucker-Unet. Furthermore, the distribution of generated tensors, induced by the estimated score function, converges to the true data distribution at a rate depending on the maximum of tensor mode dimensions, thereby offering a clear theoretical advantage over the naive vectorized approach, which has a product dependence. Empirically, compared to existing approaches, the Tucker diffusion model demonstrates strong practical potential in synthetic and real-world tensor generation tasks, achieving comparable and sometimes even superior statistical performance with significantly reduced training and sampling costs.

Overlap, also known as positivity, is a key condition for causal treatment effect estimation. Many popular estimators suffer from high variance and become brittle when features differ strongly across treatment groups. This is especially challenging in high dimensions: the curse of dimensionality can make overlap implausible. To address this, we propose a class of feature representations called deconfounding scores, which preserve both identification and the target of estimation; the classical propensity and prognostic scores are two special cases. We characterize the problem of finding a representation with better overlap as minimizing an overlap divergence under a deconfounding score constraint. We then derive closed-form expressions for a class of deconfounding scores under a broad family of generalized linear models with Gaussian features and show that prognostic scores are overlap-optimal within this class. We conduct extensive experiments to assess this behavior empirically.

While test-time scaling has enabled large language models to solve highly difficult tasks, state-of-the-art results come at exorbitant compute costs. These inefficiencies can be attributed to the miscalibration of post-trained language models, and the lack of calibration in popular sampling techniques. Here, we present Online Reasoning Calibration (ORCA), a framework for calibrating the sampling process that draws upon conformal prediction and test-time training. Specifically, we introduce a meta-learning procedure that updates the calibration module for each input. This allows us to provide valid confidence estimates under distributional shift, e.g. in thought patterns that occur across different stages of reasoning, or in prompt distributions between model development and deployment. ORCA not only provides theoretical guarantees on conformal risks, but also empirically shows higher efficiency and generalization across different reasoning tasks. At risk level $δ=0.1$, ORCA improves Qwen2.5-32B efficiency on in-distribution tasks with savings up to 47.5% with supervised labels and 40.7% with self-consistency labels. Under zero-shot out-of-domain settings, it improves MATH-500 savings from 24.8% of the static calibration baseline to 67.0% while maintaining a low empirical error rate, and the same trend holds across model families and downstream benchmarks. Our code is publicly available at https://github.com/wzekai99/ORCA.