watermark
ADD for Multi-Bit Image Watermarking
As generative models enable rapid creation of high-fidelity images, societal concerns about misinformation and authenticity have intensified. A promising remedy is multi-bit image watermarking, which embeds a multi-bit message into an image so that a verifier can later detect whether the image is generated by someone and further identify the source by decoding the embedded message. Existing approaches often fall short in capacity, resilience to common image distortions, and theoretical justification. To address these limitations, we propose ADD (Add, Dot, Decode), a multi-bit image watermarking method with two stages: learning a watermark to be linearly combined with the multi-bit message and added to the image, and decoding through inner products between the watermarked image and the learned watermark. On the standard MS-COCO benchmark, we demonstrate that for the challenging task of 48-bit watermarking, ADD achieves 100\% decoding accuracy, with performance dropping by at most 2\% under a wide range of image distortions, substantially smaller than the 14\% average drop of state-of-the-art methods. In addition, ADD achieves substantial computational gains, with 2-fold faster embedding and 7.4-fold faster decoding than the fastest existing method. We further provide a theoretical analysis explaining why the learned watermark and the corresponding decoding rule are effective.
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- North America > United States > Minnesota (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands (0.04)
Towards Anytime-Valid Statistical Watermarking
Huang, Baihe, Xu, Eric, Ramchandran, Kannan, Jiao, Jiantao, Jordan, Michael I.
The proliferation of Large Language Models (LLMs) necessitates efficient mechanisms to distinguish machine-generated content from human text. While statistical watermarking has emerged as a promising solution, existing methods suffer from two critical limitations: the lack of a principled approach for selecting sampling distributions and the reliance on fixed-horizon hypothesis testing, which precludes valid early stopping. In this paper, we bridge this gap by developing the first e-value-based watermarking framework, Anchored E-Watermarking, that unifies optimal sampling with anytime-valid inference. Unlike traditional approaches where optional stopping invalidates Type-I error guarantees, our framework enables valid, anytime-inference by constructing a test supermartingale for the detection process. By leveraging an anchor distribution to approximate the target model, we characterize the optimal e-value with respect to the worst-case log-growth rate and derive the optimal expected stopping time. Our theoretical claims are substantiated by simulations and evaluations on established benchmarks, showing that our framework can significantly enhance sample efficiency, reducing the average token budget required for detection by 13-15% relative to state-of-the-art baselines.
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.41)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Berkeley (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Burlington (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > Scotland > City of Edinburgh > Edinburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > Texas > Brazos County > College Station (0.14)
- Asia > China > Guangdong Province > Zhuhai (0.04)
- Europe > Netherlands > North Holland > Amsterdam (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Alberta > Census Division No. 6 > Calgary Metropolitan Region > Calgary (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
No Free Lunch in LLM Watermarking: Trade-offs in Watermarking Design Choices
Advances in generative models have made it possible for AI-generated text, code, and images to mirror human-generated content in many applications. W atermark-ing, a technique that aims to embed information in the output of a model to verify its source, is useful for mitigating the misuse of such AI-generated content. However, we show that common design choices in LLM watermarking schemes make the resulting systems surprisingly susceptible to attack--leading to fundamental trade-offs in robustness, utility, and usability. To navigate these trade-offs, we rigorously study a set of simple yet effective attacks on common watermarking systems, and propose guidelines and defenses for LLM watermarking in practice.
- North America > Jamaica (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania > Allegheny County > Pittsburgh (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Leisure & Entertainment > Sports > Olympic Games (0.46)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.14)
- North America > United States > Minnesota (0.04)
- Asia > India (0.04)
- Research Report > New Finding (1.00)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.93)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Law (0.93)
- North America > United States > Maryland > Prince George's County > College Park (0.04)
- Asia > Thailand > Bangkok > Bangkok (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (1.00)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.93)
- Law (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Information Technology > Sensing and Signal Processing > Image Processing (1.00)
- Information Technology > Security & Privacy (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Vision (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.46)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > Maryland (0.04)
- Europe > Romania > București - Ilfov Development Region > Municipality of Bucharest > Bucharest (0.04)