varifold
SVarM: Linear Support Varifold Machines for Classification and Regression on Geometric Data
Hartman, Emmanuel, Charon, Nicolas
Shape analysis, or geometric data science, is a field dedicated to building statistical and machine learning methods able to retrieve and analyze the morphological variability in geometric structures. This is a particularly central problem in applications such as computer vision or biomedical imaging where observations often come as segmented curves, surfaces, densities or other types of complex geometric data. Various approaches have been proposed, including Riemannian and elastic shape space models [23, 41, 31, 56], topology based methods [22, 15, 20], and metric/functional matching frameworks [11, 40, 42]. These different methods have proved quite successful in tackling problems such as pairwise comparison, regression, classification or clustering for datasets of shapes. However, with the constant advances in acquisition protocols and the explosion in the size and resolution of datasets that followed, many such methods do not always scale well to recent applications that may involve databases with up to tens of thousands of subjects, each made of potentially hundreds of thousands of vertices. In view of the rapid development of new machine learning paradigms, in particular neural network models, and their impressive achievements in image processing and analysis tasks, one can reasonably expect similar tools to be able to address those challenges on geometric data. Yet, the very particular and intricate nature of shape spaces poses unique challenges when it comes to designing robust neural network models for shape analysis tasks.
- North America > United States > New York (0.04)
- North America > United States > New Jersey > Middlesex County > Piscataway (0.04)
Neural varifolds: an aggregate representation for quantifying the geometry of point clouds
Lee, Juheon, Cai, Xiaohao, Schönlieb, Carola-Bibian, Masnou, Simon
Point clouds are popular 3D representations for real-life objects (such as in LiDAR and Kinect) due to their detailed and compact representation of surface-based geometry. Recent approaches characterise the geometry of point clouds by bringing deep learning based techniques together with geometric fidelity metrics such as optimal transportation costs (e.g., Chamfer and Wasserstein metrics). In this paper, we propose a new surface geometry characterisation within this realm, namely a neural varifold representation of point clouds. Here the surface is represented as a measure/distribution over both point positions and tangent spaces of point clouds. The varifold representation quantifies not only the surface geometry of point clouds through the manifold-based discrimination, but also subtle geometric consistencies on the surface due to the combined product space. This study proposes neural varifold algorithms to compute the varifold norm between two point clouds using neural networks on point clouds and their neural tangent kernel representations. The proposed neural varifold is evaluated on three different sought-after tasks -- shape matching, few-shot shape classification and shape reconstruction. Detailed evaluation and comparison to the state-of-the-art methods demonstrate that the proposed versatile neural varifold is superior in shape matching and few-shot shape classification, and is competitive for shape reconstruction.
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
Comparison of Distances for Supervised Segmentation of White Matter Tractography
Olivetti, Emanuele, Bertò, Giulia, Gori, Pietro, Sharmin, Nusrat, Avesani, Paolo
Tractograms are mathematical representations of the main paths of axons within the white matter of the brain, from diffusion MRI data. Such representations are in the form of polylines, called streamlines, and one streamline approximates the common path of tens of thousands of axons. The analysis of tractograms is a task of interest in multiple fields, like neurosurgery and neurology. A basic building block of many pipelines of analysis is the definition of a distance function between streamlines. Multiple distance functions have been proposed in the literature, and different authors use different distances, usually without a specific reason other than invoking the "common practice". To this end, in this work we want to test such common practices, in order to obtain factual reasons for choosing one distance over another. For these reasons, in this work we compare many streamline distance functions available in the literature. We focus on the common task of automatic bundle segmentation and we adopt the recent approach of supervised segmentation from expert-based examples. Using the HCP dataset, we compare several distances obtaining guidelines on the choice of which distance function one should use for supervised bundle segmentation.
- Europe > Italy > Trentino-Alto Adige/Südtirol > Trentino Province > Trento (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Europe > France (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area > Neurology (1.00)
- Health & Medicine > Diagnostic Medicine > Imaging (0.94)