This paper studies high-dimensional M-estimation in the proportional asymptotic regime (p/n -> gamma > 0) when the noise distribution has infinite variance. For noise with regularly-varying tails of index alpha in (1,2), we establish that the asymptotic behavior of a regularized M-estimator is governed by a single geometric property of the loss function: the boundedness of the domain of its Fenchel conjugate. When this conjugate domain is bounded -- as is the case for the Huber, absolute-value, and quantile loss functions -- the dual variable in the min-max formulation of the estimator is confined, the effective noise reduces to the finite first absolute moment of the noise distribution, and the estimator achieves bounded risk without recourse to external information. When the conjugate domain is unbounded -- as for the squared loss -- the dual variable scales with the noise, the effective noise involves the diverging second moment, and bounded risk can be achieved only through transfer regularization toward an external prior. For the squared-loss class specifically, we derive the exact asymptotic risk via the Convex Gaussian Minimax Theorem under a noise-adapted regularization scaling. The resulting risk converges to a universal floor that is independent of the regularizer, yielding a loss-risk trichotomy: squared-loss estimators without transfer diverge; Huber-loss estimators achieve bounded but non-vanishing risk; transfer-regularized estimators attain the floor.

We consider a PAC-Bayes type learning rule for binary classification, balancing the training error of a randomized ''posterior'' predictor with its KL divergence to a pre-specified ''prior''. This can be seen as an extension of a modified two-part-code Minimum Description Length (MDL) learning rule, to continuous priors and randomized predictions. With a balancing parameter of $λ=1$ this learning rule recovers an (empirical) Bayes posterior and a modified variant recovers the profile posterior, linking with standard Bayesian prediction (up to the treatment of the single-parameter noise level). However, from a risk-minimization prediction perspective, this Bayesian predictor overfits and can lead to non-vanishing excess loss in the agnostic case. Instead a choice of $λ\gg 1$, which can be seen as using a sample-size-dependent-prior, ensures uniformly vanishing excess loss even in the agnostic case. We precisely characterize the effect of under-regularizing (and over-regularizing) as a function of the balance parameter $λ$, understanding the regimes in which this under-regularization is tempered or catastrophic. This work extends previous work by Zhu and Srebro [2025] that considered only discrete priors to PAC Bayes type learning rules and, through their rigorous Bayesian interpretation, to Bayesian prediction more generally.

We present a complete theoretical characterization of Latent Posterior Factors (LPF), a principled framework for aggregating multiple heterogeneous evidence items in probabilistic prediction tasks. Multi-evidence reasoning arises pervasively in high-stakes domains including healthcare diagnosis, financial risk assessment, legal case analysis, and regulatory compliance, yet existing approaches either lack formal guarantees or fail to handle multi-evidence scenarios architecturally. LPF encodes each evidence item into a Gaussian latent posterior via a variational autoencoder, converting posteriors to soft factors through Monte Carlo marginalization, and aggregating factors via exact Sum-Product Network inference (LPF-SPN) or a learned neural aggregator (LPF-Learned). We prove seven formal guarantees spanning the key desiderata for trustworthy AI: Calibration Preservation (ECE <= epsilon + C/sqrt(K_eff)); Monte Carlo Error decaying as O(1/sqrt(M)); a non-vacuous PAC-Bayes bound with train-test gap of 0.0085 at N=4200; operation within 1.12x of the information-theoretic lower bound; graceful degradation as O(epsilon*delta*sqrt(K)) under corruption, maintaining 88% performance with half of evidence adversarially replaced; O(1/sqrt(K)) calibration decay with R^2=0.849; and exact epistemic-aleatoric uncertainty decomposition with error below 0.002%. All theorems are empirically validated on controlled datasets spanning up to 4,200 training examples. Our theoretical framework establishes LPF as a foundation for trustworthy multi-evidence AI in safety-critical applications.

Beyond conditional average treatment effects, treatments may impact the entire outcome distribution in covariate-dependent ways, for example, by altering the variance or tail risks for specific subpopulations. We propose a novel estimand to capture such conditional distributional treatment effects, and develop a doubly robust estimator that is minimax optimal in the local asymptotic sense. Using this, we develop a test for the global homogeneity of conditional potential outcome distributions that accommodates discrepancies beyond the maximum mean discrepancy (MMD), has provably valid type 1 error, and is consistent against fixed alternatives -- the first test, to our knowledge, with such guarantees in this setting. Furthermore, we derive exact closed-form expressions for two natural discrepancies (including the MMD), and provide a computationally efficient, permutation-free algorithm for our test.

In practical machine learning, the environments encountered during the model development and deployment phases often differ, especially when a model is used by many users in diverse settings. Learning models that maintain reliable performance across plausible deployment environments is known as distributionally robust (DR) learning. In this work, we study the problem of distributionally robust feature selection (DRFS), with a particular focus on sparse sensing applications motivated by industrial needs. In practical multi-sensor systems, a shared subset of sensors is typically selected prior to deployment based on performance evaluations using many available sensors. At deployment, individual users may further adapt or fine-tune models to their specific environments. When deployment environments differ from those anticipated during development, this strategy can result in systems lacking sensors required for optimal performance. To address this issue, we propose safe-DRFS, a novel approach that extends safe screening from conventional sparse modeling settings to a DR setting under covariate shift. Our method identifies a feature subset that encompasses all subsets that may become optimal across a specified range of input distribution shifts, with finite-sample theoretical guarantees of no false feature elimination.

Thisworkdiscusses howtoachieveworst-case Out-Of-Distribution(OOD) generalization for avariety of distributions based on arelatively small labeling cost.

We then propose a novel algorithm based on minimum-distance functionals in the setting where the transition model is given and the expert is deterministic.Thealgorithmissuboptimalby .|S|H3/2/N,matchingourlower

In this paper, we focus on SCI recovery algorithms that employ untrained neural networks (UNNs), such as deep image prior (DIP), to model source structure.

Key to the application of such models in safety-critical domains is the quantification of their model error. Gaussian processes provide such a measure anduniform error bounds havebeen derived,which allowsafe control based on thesemodels.

In order to perform a wide search over the space of the trees, it is critical to solve this projection problem fast.