tester
Testing for Families of Distributions via the Fourier Transform
We study the general problem of testing whether an unknown discrete distribution belongs to a specified family of distributions. More specifically, given a distribution family P and sample access to an unknown discrete distribution D, we want to distinguish (with high probability) between the case that D in P and the case that D is ε-far, in total variation distance, from every distribution in P . This is the prototypical hypothesis testing problem that has received significant attention in statistics and, more recently, in computer science. The main contribution of this work is a simple and general testing technique that is applicable to all distribution families whose Fourier spectrum satisfies a certain approximate sparsity property. We apply our Fourier-based framework to obtain near sample-optimal and computationally efficient testers for the following fundamental distribution families: Sums of Independent Integer Random Variables (SIIRVs), Poisson Multinomial Distributions (PMDs), and Discrete Log-Concave Distributions. For the first two, ours are the first non-trivial testers in the literature, vastly generalizing previous work on testing Poisson Binomial Distributions. For the third, our tester improves on prior work in both sample and time complexity.
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- Europe > France (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- Research Report > Experimental Study (0.92)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Santa Clara County > Palo Alto (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States > California (0.14)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Oxfordshire > Oxford (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Germany > North Rhine-Westphalia > Arnsberg Region > Dortmund (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Africa > Sudan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > La Jolla (0.04)
- Africa > Sudan (0.04)
- Africa > Rwanda > Kigali > Kigali (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > San Francisco County > San Francisco (0.14)
- North America > United States > California > Los Angeles County > Los Angeles (0.14)
- Asia > Singapore (0.05)
- (12 more...)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Undirected Networks > Markov Models (0.46)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning > Uncertainty > Bayesian Inference (0.32)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.32)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia > Arlington County > Arlington (0.04)
- North America > United States > Pennsylvania (0.04)
- (3 more...)