synchronization
Algorithmic Contiguity from Low-Degree Heuristic II: Predicting Detection-Recovery Gaps
The low-degree polynomial framework has emerged as a powerful tool for providing evidence of statistical-computational gaps in high-dimensional inference. For detection problems, the standard approach bounds the low-degree advantage through an explicit orthonormal basis. However, this method does not extend naturally to estimation tasks, and thus fails to capture the \emph{detection-recovery gap phenomenon} that arises in many high-dimensional problems. Although several important advances have been made to overcome this limitation \cite{SW22, SW25, CGGV25+}, the existing approaches often rely on delicate, model-specific combinatorial arguments. In this work, we develop a general approach for obtaining \emph{conditional computational lower bounds} for recovery problems from mild bounds on low-degree testing advantage. Our method combines the notion of algorithmic contiguity in \cite{Li25} with a cross-validation reduction in \cite{DHSS25} that converts successful recovery into a hypothesis test with lopsided success probabilities. In contrast to prior unconditional lower bounds, our argument is conceptually simple, flexible, and largely model-independent. We apply this framework to several canonical inference problems, including planted submatrix, planted dense subgraph, stochastic block model, multi-frequency angular synchronization, orthogonal group synchronization, and multi-layer stochastic block model. In the first three settings, our method recovers existing low-degree lower bounds for recovery in \cite{SW22, SW25} via a substantially simpler argument. In the latter three, it gives new evidence for conjectured computational thresholds including the persistence of detection-recovery gaps. Together, these results suggest that mild control of low-degree advantage is often sufficient to explain computational barriers for recovery in high-dimensional statistical models.
- North America > United States (0.28)
- Africa > Middle East > Tunisia > Ben Arous Governorate > Ben Arous (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- (3 more...)
- North America > United States > Texas > Travis County > Austin (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
- Europe > Spain > Galicia > Madrid (0.04)
- (4 more...)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Europe > Germany > Bavaria > Upper Bavaria > Munich (0.05)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Suffolk County > Boston (0.04)
- (10 more...)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > Spain (0.04)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning (0.94)
- Information Technology > Data Science > Data Mining > Big Data (0.68)
- Information Technology > Communications > Networks (0.67)
- Europe > Switzerland (0.05)
- North America > United States > District of Columbia > Washington (0.04)
- Asia > China > Beijing > Beijing (0.04)
- (5 more...)
- North America > United States > California > San Diego County > San Diego (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Kantō > Tokyo Metropolis Prefecture > Tokyo (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Sardinia (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Illinois > Champaign County > Urbana (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Africa > Ghana > Greater Accra > Accra (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria > Catanzaro Province > Catanzaro (0.04)
- Asia > South Korea > Seoul > Seoul (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)