We develop a semi-parametric state-space model for time-series data with latent regime transitions. Classical Markov-switching models use fixed parametric transition functions, such as logistic or probit links, which restrict flexibility when transitions depend on nonlinear and context-dependent effects. We replace this assumption with learned functions $f_0, f_1 \in \calH$, where $\calH$ is either a reproducing kernel Hilbert space or a spline approximation space, and define transition probabilities as $p_{jk,t} = \sigmoid(f(\bx_{t-1}))$. The transition functions are estimated jointly with emission parameters using a generalized Expectation-Maximization algorithm. The E-step uses the standard forward-backward recursion, while the M-step reduces to a penalized regression problem with weights from smoothed occupation measures. We establish identifiability conditions and provide a consistency argument for the resulting estimators. Experiments on synthetic data show improved recovery of nonlinear transition dynamics compared to parametric baselines. An empirical study on financial time series demonstrates improved regime classification and earlier detection of transition events.

Sentiment signals derived from sparse news are commonly used in financial analysis and technology monitoring, yet transforming raw article-level observations into reliable temporal series remains a largely unsolved engineering problem. Rather than treating this as a classification challenge, we propose to frame it as a causal signal reconstruction problem: given probabilistic sentiment outputs from a fixed classifier, recover a stable latent sentiment series that is robust to the structural pathologies of news data such as sparsity, redundancy, and classifier uncertainty. We present a modular three-stage pipeline that (i) aggregates article-level scores onto a regular temporal grid with uncertainty-aware and redundancy-aware weights, (ii) fills coverage gaps through strictly causal projection rules, and (iii) applies causal smoothing to reduce residual noise. Because ground-truth longitudinal sentiment labels are typically unavailable, we introduce a label-free evaluation framework based on signal stability diagnostics, information preservation lag proxies, and counterfactual tests for causality compliance and redundancy robustness. As a secondary external check, we evaluate the consistency of reconstructed signals against stock-price data for a multi-firm dataset of AI-related news titles (November 2024 to February 2026). The key empirical finding is a three-week lead lag pattern between reconstructed sentiment and price that persists across all tested pipeline configurations and aggregation regimes, a structural regularity more informative than any single correlation coefficient. Overall, the results support the view that stable, deployable sentiment indicators require careful reconstruction, not only better classifiers.

We focus on categorical attributes of language. Examples of such attributes include sentiment, language complexity, tense, voice, honorifics, mood, etc. Our approach draws inspiration from styletransfer methods inthevision andlanguage literature.

This section provides a comprehensive overview of the CSMV dataset. This extensive time range allows for the inclusion of a diverse set of content, capturing the evolution of sentiments over the course of more than two years. The distribution of labels in our CSMV dataset is shown in Figure 1. In Figure 1a, the opinion labels are distributed as follows: positive - 47%, neutral - 42%, and negative - 11%. Negative comments are clearly in the minority.

In light of this, we introduces a novel research task, M ulti-modal S entiment A nalysis for C omment R esponse of V ideo I nduced( MSA-CRVI), aims to infer opinions and emotions according to comments response to micro video.

Feature attributions attempt to highlight what inputs drive predictive power. Good attributions or explanations are thus those that produce inputs that retain this predictive power; accordingly, evaluations of explanations score their quality of prediction. However, evaluations produce scores better than what appears possible from the values in the explanation for a class of explanations, called encoding explanations. Probing for encoding remains a challenge because there is no general characterization of what gives the extra predictive power. We develop a definition of encoding that identifies this extra predictive power via conditional dependence and show that the definition fits existing examples of encoding. This definition implies, in contrast to encoding explanations, that non-encoding explanations contain all the informative inputs used to produce the explanation, giving them a "what you see is what you get" property, which makes them transparent and simple to use.

Add a small icon before the "Welcome to our ice cream parlor!" text using the URL https://cdn-556