sentiment
- North America > United States > Oregon > Multnomah County > Portland (0.04)
- North America > Canada > Quebec > Montreal (0.04)
Supplementary Material Infer Induced Sentiment of Comment Response to Video: A New Task, Dataset and Baseline Qi Jia 1 Baoyu Fan 2,1 Cong Xu1 Lu Liu
This section provides a comprehensive overview of the CSMV dataset. This extensive time range allows for the inclusion of a diverse set of content, capturing the evolution of sentiments over the course of more than two years. The distribution of labels in our CSMV dataset is shown in Figure 1. In Figure 1a, the opinion labels are distributed as follows: positive - 47%, neutral - 42%, and negative - 11%. Negative comments are clearly in the minority.
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > Italy > Tuscany > Florence (0.04)
- Asia > China > Tianjin Province > Tianjin (0.04)
- Health & Medicine > Therapeutic Area (0.46)
- Information Technology > Services (0.46)
Explanations that reveal all through the definition of encoding
Feature attributions attempt to highlight what inputs drive predictive power. Good attributions or explanations are thus those that produce inputs that retain this predictive power; accordingly, evaluations of explanations score their quality of prediction. However, evaluations produce scores better than what appears possible from the values in the explanation for a class of explanations, called encoding explanations. Probing for encoding remains a challenge because there is no general characterization of what gives the extra predictive power. We develop a definition of encoding that identifies this extra predictive power via conditional dependence and show that the definition fits existing examples of encoding. This definition implies, in contrast to encoding explanations, that non-encoding explanations contain all the informative inputs used to produce the explanation, giving them a "what you see is what you get" property, which makes them transparent and simple to use.
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.93)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (0.68)
- (2 more...)
- North America > United States > Minnesota > Hennepin County > Minneapolis (0.14)
- Europe > Italy > Tuscany > Florence (0.04)
- Asia > China > Hong Kong (0.04)
- (8 more...)
- North America > United States (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom (0.04)
- Europe > Russia (0.04)
- (6 more...)
- Research Report > New Finding (0.67)
- Instructional Material (0.67)
- Research Report > Promising Solution (0.45)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Natural Language > Large Language Model (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Neural Networks > Deep Learning (0.95)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Reinforcement Learning (0.67)
- North America > United States > Maryland (0.04)
- Europe > Switzerland > Zürich > Zürich (0.04)
- North America > Canada > British Columbia > Metro Vancouver Regional District > Vancouver (0.04)
- Asia > China (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Jordan (0.04)
- North America > United States > Massachusetts > Middlesex County > Cambridge (0.04)
- North America > Canada (0.04)