Free-text crash narratives recorded in real-world crash databases have been shown to play a significant role in improving traffic safety. However, large-scale analyses remain difficult to implement as there are no documented tools that can batch process the unstructured, non standardized text content written by various authors with diverse experience and attention to detail. In recent years, Transformer-based pre-trained language models (PLMs), such as Bidirectional Encoder Representations from Transformers (BERT) and large language models (LLMs), have demonstrated strong capabilities across various natural language processing tasks. These models can extract explicit facts from crash narratives, but their performance declines on inference-heavy tasks in, for example, Crash Type identification, which can involve nearly 100 categories. Moreover, relying on closed LLMs through external APIs raises privacy concerns for sensitive crash data. Additionally, these black-box tools often underperform due to limited domain knowledge. Motivated by these challenges, we study whether compact open-source PLMs can support reasoning-intensive extraction from crash narratives. We target two challenging objectives: 1) identifying the Manner of Collision for a crash, and 2) Crash Type for each vehicle involved in the crash event from real-world crash narratives. To bridge domain gaps, we apply fine-tuning techniques to inject task-specific knowledge to LLMs with Low-Rank Adaption (LoRA) and BERT. Experiments on the authoritative real-world dataset Crash Investigation Sampling System (CISS) demonstrate that our fine-tuned compact models outperform strong closed LLMs, such as GPT-4o, while requiring only minimal training resources. Further analysis reveals that the fine-tuned PLMs can capture richer narrative details and even correct some mislabeled annotations in the dataset.

Efficient and current roadway geometry data collection is a critical task for transportation agencies to undertake effective road planning, maintenance, design, and rehabilitation efforts. The methods for gathering such data can be broadly classified into two categories: a) land-based methods, which encompass field inventory, mobile mapping, and image logging, and b) aerial-based methods, which involve satellite imagery, drones, and laser scanning. However, employing land-based techniques for extensive highway networks covering thousands of miles proves arduous and costly, and poses safety risks for crew members. Consequently, there exists a pressing need to develop more efficient methodologies for acquiring this data promptly, safely, and economically. Fortunately, with the increasing availability of high-resolution images and recent strides in computer vision and object detection technologies, automated extraction of roadway geometry features has become feasible.

We propose and study a data-driven framework for identifying traffic congestion functions (numerical relationships between observations of macroscopic traffic variables) at global scale and segment-level granularity. In contrast to methods that estimate a separate set of parameters for each roadway, ours learns a single black-box function over all roadways in a metropolitan area. First, we pool traffic data from all segments into one dataset, combining static attributes with dynamic time-dependent features. Second, we train a feed-forward neural network on this dataset, which we can then use on any segment in the area. We evaluate how well our framework identifies congestion functions on observed segments and how it generalizes to unobserved segments and predicts segment attributes on a large dataset covering multiple cities worldwide. For identification error on observed segments, our single data-driven congestion function compares favorably to segment-specific model-based functions on highway roads, but has room to improve on arterial roads. For generalization, our approach shows strong performance across cities and road types: both on unobserved segments in the same city and on zero-shot transfer learning between cities. Finally, for predicting segment attributes, we find that our approach can approximate critical densities for individual segments using their static properties.

This paper presents a new approach to detecting road boundaries based on sparse radar signals. We model the roadway using a homogeneous model and derive its conditional predictive model under known radar motion. Using the conditional predictive model and model radar points using a Dirichlet Process Mixture Model (DPMM), we employ Mean Field Variational Inference (MFVI) to derive an unconditional road boundary model distribution. In order to generate initial candidate solutions for the MFVI, we develop a custom Random Sample and Consensus (RANSAC) variant to propose unseen model instances as candidate road boundaries. For each radar point cloud we alternate the MFVI and RANSAC proposal steps until convergence to generate the best estimate of all candidate models. We select the candidate model with the minimum lateral distance to the radar on each side as the estimates of the left and right boundaries. We have implemented the proposed algorithm in C++. We have tested the algorithm and it has shown satisfactory results. More specifically, the mean lane boundary estimation error is not more than 11.0 cm.

The development of plans of action in disaster response scenarios is a time-consuming process. Large Language Models (LLMs) offer a powerful solution to expedite this process through in-context learning. This study presents DisasterResponseGPT, an algorithm that leverages LLMs to generate valid plans of action quickly by incorporating disaster response and planning guidelines in the initial prompt. In DisasterResponseGPT, users input the scenario description and receive a plan of action as output. The proposed method generates multiple plans within seconds, which can be further refined following the user's feedback. Preliminary results indicate that the plans of action developed by DisasterResponseGPT are comparable to human-generated ones while offering greater ease of modification in real-time. This approach has the potential to revolutionize disaster response operations by enabling rapid updates and adjustments during the plan's execution.

We address the problem of controlling Connected and Automated Vehicles (CAVs) in conflict areas of a traffic network subject to hard safety constraints. It has been shown that such problems can be solved through a combination of tractable optimal control problems and Control Barrier Functions (CBFs) that guarantee the satisfaction of all constraints. These solutions can be reduced to a sequence of Quadratic Programs (QPs) which are efficiently solved on line over discrete time steps. However, guaranteeing the feasibility of the CBF-based QP method within each discretized time interval requires the careful selection of time steps which need to be sufficiently small. This creates computational requirements and communication rates between agents which may hinder the controller's application to real CAVs. In this paper, we overcome this limitation by adopting an event-triggered approach for CAVs in a conflict area such that the next QP is triggered by properly defined events with a safety guarantee. We present a laboratory-scale test bed we have developed to emulate merging roadways using mobile robots as CAVs which can be used to demonstrate how the event-triggered scheme is computationally efficient and can handle measurement uncertainties and noise compared to time-driven control while guaranteeing safety.

More than half of all fatalities on U.S. highways occur due to roadway departure (RwD) each year. Previous research has explored various risk factors that contribute to RwD crashes, however, a comprehensive investigation considering the effect of lighting conditions has been insufficiently addressed. Using the Louisiana Department of Transportation and Development crash database, fatal and injury RwD crashes occurring on rural two-lane (R2L) highways between 2008-2017 were analyzed based on daylight and dark (with/without streetlight). This research employed a safe system approach to explore meaningful complex interactions among multidimensional crash risk factors. To accomplish this, an unsupervised data mining algorithm association rules mining (ARM) was utilized. Based on the generated rules, the findings reveal several interesting crash patterns in the daylight, dark-with-streetlight, and dark-no-streetlight, emphasizing the importance of investigating RwD crash patterns depending on the lighting conditions. In daylight, fatal RwD crashes are associated with cloudy weather conditions, distracted drivers, standing water on the roadway, no seat belt use, and construction zones. In dark lighting conditions (with/without streetlight), the majority of the RwD crashes are associated with alcohol/drug involvement, young drivers (15-24 years), driver condition (e.g., inattentive, distracted, illness/fatigued/asleep) and colliding with animal (s). The findings reveal how certain driver behavior patterns are connected to RwD crashes, such as a strong association between alcohol/drug intoxication and no seat belt usage in the dark-no-streetlight condition. Based on the identified crash patterns and behavioral characteristics under different lighting conditions, the findings could aid researchers and safety specialists in developing the most effective RwD crash mitigation strategies.

Fundamental diagrams describe the relationship between speed, flow, and density for some roadway (or set of roadway) configuration(s). These diagrams typically do not reflect, however, information on how speed-flow relationships change as a function of exogenous variables such as curb configuration, weather or other exogenous, contextual information. In this paper we present a machine learning methodology that respects known engineering constraints and physical laws of roadway flux - those that are captured in fundamental diagrams - and show how this can be used to introduce contextual information into the generation of these diagrams. The modeling task is formulated as a probe vehicle trajectory reconstruction problem with Neural Ordinary Differential Equations (Neural ODEs). With the presented methodology, we extend the fundamental diagram to non-idealized roadway segments with potentially obstructed traffic data. For simulated data, we generalize this relationship by introducing contextual information at the learning stage, i.e. vehicle composition, driver behavior, curb zoning configuration, etc, and show how the speed-flow relationship changes as a function of these exogenous factors independent of roadway design.

When driving, mind your own business or help other drivers, that's the question to be pondered. That's also a common refrain and refers to the notion of being helpful to others, even though they might be complete strangers and you do not know them at all. Which of those two catchphrases or words of wisdom would you choose? You probably make daily decisions about those two possibilities. There are situations and settings wherein you opt to mind your own business. At times, it might be quite tempting to step into the middle of something, but you weigh the pros and cons of doing so, and then at times move along and do not get into the fray. On the other hand, there are times that you decide it is best to jump into the swimming pool, as it were, and get engaged. Let's turn this somewhat conceptual or philosophical discussion into something very grounded and real. I was driving my car the other day and had come up to an intersection to make a left turn.

The estimated economic cost of all fatalities due to traffic crashes in 2018 was approximately $55 billion in the United States (CDC, 2020). Such a huge cost warrants continued investigation into the contributing factors of crash fatalities and the implementation of effective countermeasures for improving traffic safety. Traditional safety studies have generally focused on identifying correlations between crashes and roadway features. Due to a lack of substantial driving behavior information in conventional historical crash datasets, these studies can seldom identify driving behaviors that contribute to crashes. Moreover, traditional studies require crash data spanning an extended period of time.