Conventional planning units or urban regions, such as census tracts, zip codes, or neighborhoods, often do not capture the specific demands of local communities and lack the flexibility to implement effective strategies for hazard prevention or response. To support the creation of dynamic planning units, we introduce a planning support system with agentic AI that enables users to generate demand-oriented regions for disaster planning, integrating the human-in-the-loop principle for transparency and adaptability. The platform is built on a representative initialized spatially constrained self-organizing map (RepSC-SOM), extending traditional SOM with adaptive geographic filtering and region-growing refinement, while AI agents can reason, plan, and act to guide the process by suggesting input features, guiding spatial constraints, and supporting interactive exploration. We demonstrate the capabilities of the platform through a case study on the flooding-related risk in Jacksonville, Florida, showing how it allows users to explore, generate, and evaluate regionalization interactively, combining computational rigor with user-driven decision making.

Regionalization (MPR) method, combining descriptors upscaling Regardless of the improvements made in hydrological and pre-regionalization function in form of multilinear forward models and available data, hydrological calibration regressions, implemented within a spatially distributed remains a challenging ill-posed inverse problem faced with multiscale hydrological model (mHm), has been proposed the equifinality (Beven, 2001) of feasible solutions. Most by Samaniego et al. (2010), and later applied to other gridded calibration approaches aim to estimate spatially uniform model hydrological models in several applicative studies (e.g., parameters for a single gauged catchment, resulting in piecewise Mizukami et al. (2017); Beck et al. (2020)). In all the constant discontinuous parameters fields for adjacent above studies, state of the art optimization algorithms are catchments. Moreover, these calibrated parameter are not used, especially Shuffle Complex Evolution algorithm (SCE) transferable to ungauged locations, which represents the majority (Duan et al., 1992) in Mizukami et al. (2017) or Distributed of the global land surface (Fekete & Vörösmarty, 2007; Evolutionary Algorithms (DEAP) (Fortin et al., 2012) in Beck Hannah et al., 2011).

Kernel-based regularized risk minimizers, also called support vector machines (SVMs), are known to possess many desirable properties but suffer from their super-linear computational requirements when dealing with large data sets. This problem can be tackled by using localized SVMs instead, which also offer the additional advantage of being able to apply different hyperparameters to different regions of the input space. In this paper, localized SVMs are analyzed with regards to their consistency. It is proven that they inherit $L_p$- as well as risk consistency from global SVMs under very weak conditions and even if the regions underlying the localized SVMs are allowed to change as the size of the training data set increases.

While significant progress has been made towards explaining black-box machine-learning (ML) models, there is still a distinct lack of diagnostic tools that elucidate the spatial behaviour of ML models in terms of predictive skill and variable importance. This contribution proposes spatial prediction error profiles (SPEPs) and spatial variable importance profiles (SVIPs) as novel model-agnostic assessment and interpretation tools for spatial prediction models with a focus on prediction distance. Their suitability is demonstrated in two case studies representing a regionalization task in an environmental-science context, and a classification task from remotely-sensed land cover classification. In these case studies, the SPEPs and SVIPs of geostatistical methods, linear models, random forest, and hybrid algorithms show striking differences but also relevant similarities. Limitations of related cross-validation techniques are outlined, and the case is made that modelers should focus their model assessment and interpretation on the intended spatial prediction horizon. The range of autocorrelation, in contrast, is not a suitable criterion for defining spatial cross-validation test sets. The novel diagnostic tools enrich the toolkit of spatial data science, and may improve ML model interpretation, selection, and design.

The current COVID-19 crisis brings new meaning to the term disruption. Organizations and their supply chain managers need new supply chain management best practices -- and fast. Coronavirus panic buying, national lockdowns, sudden changes in buying priorities and shipping challenges are each having a different impact on supply chains. Companies are going to have to face the new reality, which is that we cannot make supply chain decisions based purely on economics, said Tom Derry, CEO of the Institute for Supply Management. Enterprises need to factor in a variety of disruptions, including geopolitical events, weather and health problems.

Regularized kernel-based methods such as support vector machines (SVMs) typically depend on the underlying probability measure $\mathrm{P}$ (respectively an empirical measure $\mathrm{D}_n$ in applications) as well as on the regularization parameter $\lambda$ and the kernel $k$. Whereas classical statistical robustness only considers the effect of small perturbations in $\mathrm{P}$, the present paper investigates the influence of simultaneous slight variations in the whole triple $(\mathrm{P},\lambda,k)$, respectively $(\mathrm{D}_n,\lambda_n,k)$, on the resulting predictor. Existing results from the literature are considerably generalized and improved. In order to also make them applicable to big data, where regular SVMs suffer from their super-linear computational requirements, we show how our results can be transferred to the context of localized learning. Here, the effect of slight variations in the applied regionalization, which might for example stem from changes in $\mathrm{P}$ respectively $\mathrm{D}_n$, is considered as well.

When fitting statistical models to variables in geoscientific disciplines such as hydrology, it is a customary practice to regionalize - to divide a large spatial domain into multiple regions and study each region separately - instead of fitting a single model on the entire data (also known as unification). Traditional wisdom in these fields suggests that models built for each region separately will have higher performance because of homogeneity within each region. However, by partitioning the training data, each model has access to fewer data points and cannot learn from commonalities between regions. Here, through two hydrologic examples (soil moisture and streamflow), we argue that unification can often significantly outperform regionalization in the era of big data and deep learning (DL). Common DL architectures, even without bespoke customization, can automatically build models that benefit from regional commonality while accurately learning region-specific differences. We highlight an effect we call data synergy, where the results of the DL models improved when data were pooled together from characteristically different regions. In fact, the performance of the DL models benefited from more diverse rather than more homogeneous training data. We hypothesize that DL models automatically adjust their internal representations to identify commonalities while also providing sufficient discriminatory information to the model. The results here advocate for pooling together larger datasets, and suggest the academic community should place greater emphasis on data sharing and compilation.