Detecting biases in artificial intelligence has become difficult because of the impenetrable nature of deep learning. The central difficulty is in relating unobservable phenomena deep inside models with observable, outside quantities that we can measure from inputs and outputs. For example, can we detect gendered perceptions of occupations (e.g., female librarian, male electrician) using questions to and answers from a word embedding-based system? Current techniques for detecting biases are often customized for a task, dataset, or method, affecting their generalization. In this work, we draw from Psychophysics in Experimental Psychology---meant to relate quantities from the real world (i.e., "Physics") into subjective measures in the mind (i.e., "Psyche")---to propose an intellectually coherent and generalizable framework to detect biases in AI. Specifically, we adapt the two-alternative forced choice task (2AFC) to estimate potential biases and the strength of those biases in black-box models. We successfully reproduce previously-known biased perceptions in word embeddings and sentiment analysis predictions. We discuss how concepts in experimental psychology can be naturally applied to understanding artificial mental phenomena, and how psychophysics can form a useful methodological foundation to study fairness in AI.

The purpose of this workshop was to discuss both recent experimental findings and computational models of the neurobiological implementation of selective attention. Recent experimental results were presented in two of the four presentations given (C.E. Connor, Washington University and B.C. Motter, SUNY and V.A. Medical Center, Syracuse), while the other two talks were devoted to computational models (E. Connor presented the results of an experiment in which the receptive field profiles of V 4 neurons were mapped during different states of attention in an awake, behaving monkey. The attentional focus was manipulated in this experiment by altering the position of a behaviorally relevant ring-shaped stimulus.

The purpose of this workshop was to discuss both recent experimental findings and computational models of the neurobiological implementation of selective attention. Recent experimental results were presented in two of the four presentations given (C.E. Connor, Washington University and B.C. Motter, SUNY and V.A. Medical Center, Syracuse), while the other two talks were devoted to computational models (E. Connor presented the results of an experiment in which the receptive field profiles of V 4 neurons were mapped during different states of attention in an awake, behaving monkey. The attentional focus was manipulated in this experiment by altering the position of a behaviorally relevant ring-shaped stimulus.

Olshausen Department of Anatomy and Neurobiology Washington University School of Medicine St. Louis, MO 63110 The purpose of this workshop was to discuss both recent experimental findings and computational models of the neurobiological implementation of selective attention. Recent experimental results were presented in two of the four presentations given (C.E. Connor, Washington University and B.C. Motter, SUNY and V.A. Medical Center, Syracuse), while the other two talks were devoted to computational models (E. Connor presented the results of an experiment in which the receptive field profiles of V 4 neurons were mapped during different states of attention in an awake, behaving monkey. The attentional focus was manipulated in this experiment by altering the position of a behaviorally relevant ring-shaped stimulus.