Each trial consists ofasequence of upto350swimbouts(b.)

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

Learning of low dimensional structure in multidimensional data is a canonical problem in machine learning. One common approach is to suppose that the observed data are close to a lower-dimensional smooth manifold. There are a rich variety of manifold learning methods available, which allow mapping of data points to the manifold. However, there is a clear lack of probabilistic methods that allow learning of the manifold along with the generative distribution of the observed data. The best attempt is the Gaussian process latent variable model (GP-L VM), but identifiability issues lead to poor performance. We solve these issues by proposing a novel Coulomb repulsive process (Corp) for locations of points on the manifold, inspired by physical models of electrostatic interactions among particles. Combining this process with a GP prior for the mapping function yields a novel electrostatic GP (electroGP) process. Focusing on the simple case of a one-dimensional manifold, we develop efficient inference algorithms, and illustrate substantially improved performance in a variety of experiments including filling in missing frames in video.

We present the Gaussian process dynamical mixture model (GPDMM) and show its utility in single-example learning of human motion data. The Gaussian process dynamical model (GPDM) is a form of the Gaussian process latent variable model (GPLVM), but optimized with a hidden Markov model dynamical prior. The GPDMM combines multiple GPDMs in a probabilistic mixture-of-experts framework, utilizing embedded geometric features to allow for diverse sequences to be encoded in a single latent space, enabling the categorization and generation of each sequence class. GPDMs and our mixture model are particularly advantageous in addressing the challenges of modeling human movement in scenarios where data is limited and model interpretability is vital, such as in patient-specific medical applications like prosthesis control. We score the GPDMM on classification accuracy and generative ability in single-example learning, showcase model variations, and benchmark it against LSTMs, VAEs, and transformers.

The authors propose a marked process latent variable model that leverages Gaussian processes for continuous latent sates, a generalized linear model for discrete latent states and an inference network for efficient inference. Results on real data suggest that the proposed approach is interpretable and outperforms standard baselines on held out data. I really enjoyed reading the paper, it is very well written. That being said, the notation is sloppy and lack of details makes it difficult to appreciate the contributions of the paper. The authors seemed to have assumed that the reader is very familiar with point processes, Gaussian processes, variational inference and deep learning.

Learning of low dimensional structure in multidimensional data is a canonical problem in machine learning. One common approach is to suppose that the observed data are close to a lower-dimensional smooth manifold. There are a rich variety of manifold learning methods available, which allow mapping of data points to the manifold. However, there is a clear lack of probabilistic methods that allow learning of the manifold along with the generative distribution of the observed data. The best attempt is the Gaussian process latent variable model (GP-LVM), but identifiability issues lead to poor performance. We solve these issues by proposing a novel Coulomb repulsive process (Corp) for locations of points on the manifold, inspired by physical models of electrostatic interactions among particles. Combining this process with a GP prior for the mapping function yields a novel electrostatic GP (electroGP) process. Focusing on the simple case of a one-dimensional manifold, we develop efficient inference algorithms, and illustrate substantially improved performance in a variety of experiments including filling in missing frames in video.

We propose a fully generative model where the latent variable respects both the distances and the topology of the modeled data. The model leverages the Riemannian geometry of the generated manifold to endow the latent space with a well-defined stochastic distance measure, which is modeled as Nakagami distributions. These stochastic distances are sought to be as similar as possible to observed distances along a neighborhood graph through a censoring process. The model is inferred by variational inference and is therefore fully generative. We demonstrate how the new model can encode invariances in the learned manifolds.

Optimal asset allocation is a key topic in modern finance theory. To realize the optimal asset allocation on investor's risk aversion, various portfolio construction methods have been proposed. Recently, the applications of machine learning are rapidly growing in the area of finance. In this article, we propose the Student's $t$-process latent variable model (TPLVM) to describe non-Gaussian fluctuations of financial timeseries by lower dimensional latent variables. Subsequently, we apply the TPLVM to minimum-variance portfolio as an alternative of existing nonlinear factor models. To test the performance of the proposed portfolio, we construct minimum-variance portfolios of global stock market indices based on the TPLVM or Gaussian process latent variable model. By comparing these portfolios, we confirm the proposed portfolio outperforms that of the existing Gaussian process latent variable model.

Gaussian processes are a flexible Bayesian nonparametric modelling approach that has been widely applied to learning tasks such as facial expression recognition, image reconstruction, and human pose estimation. To address the issues of poor scaling from exact inference methods, approximation methods based on sparse Gaussian processes (SGP) and variational inference (VI) are necessary for the inference on large datasets. However, one of the problems involved in SGP, especially in latent variable models, is that the distribution of the inducing inputs may fail to capture the distribution of training inputs, which may lead to inefficient inference and poor model prediction. Hence, we propose a regularization approach for sparse Gaussian processes. We also extend this regularization approach into latent sparse Gaussian processes in a unified view, considering the balance of the distribution of inducing inputs and embedding inputs. Furthermore, we justify that performing VI on a sparse latent Gaussian process with this regularization term is equivalent to performing VI on a related empirical Bayes model with a prior on the inducing inputs. Also stochastic variational inference is available for our regularization approach. Finally, the feasibility of our proposed regularization method is demonstrated on three real-world datasets.

Data-driven techniques for identifying disease subtypes using medical records can greatly benefit the management of patients' health and unravel the underpinnings of diseases. Clinical patient records are typically collected from disparate sources and result in high-dimensional data comprising of multiple likelihoods with noisy and missing values. Probabilistic methods capable of analysing large-scale patient records have a central role in biomedical research and are expected to become even more important when data-driven personalised medicine will be established in clinical practise. In this work we propose an unsupervised, generative model that can identify clustering among patients in a latent space while making use of all available data (i.e. in a heterogeneous data setting with noisy and missing values). We make use of the Gaussian process latent variable models (GPLVM) and deep neural networks to create a non-linear dimensionality reduction technique for heterogeneous data. The effectiveness of our model is demonstrated on clinical data of Parkinson's disease patients treated at the HUS Helsinki University Hospital. We demonstrate sub-groups from the heterogeneous patient data, evaluate the robustness of the findings, and interpret cluster characteristics.