Accurately identifying patients with specific medical conditions is a key challenge when using clinical data from electronic health records. Our objective was to comprehensively assess when weakly-supervised prediction methods, which use silver-standard labels (proxy measures of the true outcome) rather than gold-standard true labels, perform well in rare-outcome settings like vaccine safety studies. We compared three methods (PheNorm, MAP, and sureLDA) that combine structured features and features derived from clinical text using natural language processing, through an extensive simulation study with data-generating mechanisms ranging from simple to complex, varying outcome rates, and varying degrees of informative silver labels. We also considered using predicted probabilities to design a chart review validation study. No single method dominated the other across all prediction performance metrics. Probability-guided sampling selected a cohort enriched for patients with more mentions of important concepts in chart notes. SureLDA, the most complex of the three algorithms we considered, often performed well in simulations. Performance depended greatly on selected tuning parameters. Care should be taken when using weakly-supervised prediction methods in rare-outcome settings, particularly if the probabilities will be used in downstream analysis, but these methods can work well when silver labels are strong predictors of true outcomes.

The complex Gaussian distribution has been widely used as a fundamental spectral and noise model in signal processing and communication. However, its Gaussian structure often limits its ability to represent the diverse amplitude characteristics observed in individual source signals. On the other hand, many existing non-Gaussian amplitude distributions derived from hyperspherical models achieve good empirical fit due to their power-law structures, while they do not explicitly account for the complex-plane geometry inherent in complex-valued observations. In this paper, we propose a new probabilistic model for complex-valued random variables, which can be interpreted as a power-weighted noncentral complex Gaussian distribution. Unlike conventional hyperspherical amplitude models, the proposed model is formulated directly on the complex plane and preserves the geometric structure of complex-valued observations while retaining a higher-dimensional interpretation. The model introduces a nonlinear phase diffusion through a single shape parameter, enabling continuous control of the distributional geometry from arc-shaped diffusion along the phase direction to concentration of probability mass toward the origin. We formulate the proposed distribution and analyze the statistical properties of the induced amplitude distribution. The derived amplitude and power distributions provide a unified framework encompassing several widely used distributions in signal modeling, including the Rice, Nakagami, and gamma distributions. Experimental results on speech power spectra demonstrate that the proposed model consistently outperforms conventional distributions in terms of log-likelihood.

We introduce Exponential Family Discriminant Analysis (EFDA), a unified generative framework that extends classical Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) beyond the Gaussian setting to any member of the exponential family. Under the assumption that each class-conditional density belongs to a common exponential family, EFDA derives closed-form maximum-likelihood estimators for all natural parameters and yields a decision rule that is linear in the sufficient statistic, recovering LDA as a special case and capturing nonlinear decision boundaries in the original feature space. We prove that EFDA is asymptotically calibrated and statistically efficient under correct specification, and we generalise it to $K \geq 2$ classes and multivariate data. Through extensive simulation across five exponential-family distributions (Weibull, Gamma, Exponential, Poisson, Negative Binomial), EFDA matches the classification accuracy of LDA, QDA, and logistic regression while reducing Expected Calibration Error (ECE) by $2$-$6\times$, a gap that is structural: it persists for all $n$ and across all class-imbalance levels, because misspecified models remain asymptotically miscalibrated. We further prove and empirically confirm that EFDA's log-odds estimator approaches the Cramér-Rao bound under correct specification, and is the only estimator in our comparison whose mean squared error converges to zero. Complete derivations are provided for nine distributions. Finally, we formally verify all four theoretical propositions in Lean 4, using Aristotle (Harmonic) and OpenGauss (Math, Inc.) as proof generators, with all outputs independently machine-checked by AXLE (Axiom).

Withoutrequiring repeatable trials, itcanflexibly capture covariate-dependent jointSCDs, andprovide interpretable latent causes underlying the statistical dependencies between neurons.

Our tight mechanism-specific bounds outperform tight mechanism-agnostic bounds and classic group privacy results.

A common approach for private training of differentiable models, such as neural networks, is to apply first-order methods with noisy gradients.

Trusted execution environments (TEEs) canbeused to protect the content of the data during query computation, while supporting differential-private (DP) queries in TEEs provides record privacy when query output isrevealed.

Neural Information Processing Systems http://nips.cc/

This study provides a normative theory for how Bayesian causal inference can be implemented in neural circuits. In both cognitive processes such as causal reasoning and perceptual inference such ascue integration, the nervous systems need to choose different models representing the underlying causal structures when making inferences on external stimuli.

While existing approaches only model finite, discrete fidelities, in practice, the feasible fidelity choice is often infinite, which can correspond to a continuous mesh spacing orfinite element length.