partition
Country:
- North America > Canada > British Columbia (0.04)
- Asia > Japan > Honshū > Chūgoku > Hiroshima Prefecture > Hiroshima (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Europe > Monaco (0.04)
- Europe > Italy > Calabria (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Technology:
Country:
- North America > Canada > Ontario > Toronto (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Greater London > London (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- North America > United States > Wisconsin > Dane County > Madison (0.04)
- North America > United States > Virginia > Arlington County > Arlington (0.04)
- North America > Puerto Rico > San Juan > San Juan (0.04)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Technology:
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Representation & Reasoning (1.00)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Computational Learning Theory (0.68)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning > Clustering (0.67)
- Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Learning Graphical Models > Directed Networks > Bayesian Learning (0.50)
Country:
- North America > United States > California (0.04)
- Oceania > New Zealand (0.04)
- Oceania > Australia (0.04)
- (7 more...)
Technology: Information Technology > Artificial Intelligence > Machine Learning > Statistical Learning (1.00)
Country:
- Europe > Belgium (0.04)
- South America > Brazil (0.04)
- North America > United States > California > Alameda County > Livermore (0.04)
- (2 more...)
Technology:
Country:
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
Technology:
Country:
- North America > United States (0.14)
- Europe > United Kingdom > England > Cambridgeshire > Cambridge (0.04)
- Asia > Middle East > Israel (0.04)
Technology:
Supplementary Materials A Complexity Analysis
Our proposed method significantly reduces communication overhead in federated learning. This method poses a trade-off between time and memory complexity. We also provide detailed information about the optimization hyperparameters e.g. In this section, we explore the effect of fitness sparsification i.e. selecting top-k fitness values from the To enable a fair and insightful comparison between the two population sizes, our focus was on assessing performance based on the number of members remaining post-sparsification rather than directly contrasting sparsification rates. Our results underline the crucial role that population size plays in exploring optimal solutions, overshadowing even the significance of compression rate.
Technology: