I'm Patti bass headed Sagar Group of Institutions today we are up for our upcoming event and you know we are into it. We were talking since last 7 days and yes here we are so let me introduce Lucy's. It's a series of technical Talks based on trending Technologies. Associate Got a great relations and of course, let me introduce our guest of honor today. Mister Rohit Dubey senior Consultant Cloud Technologies OpenText Bangalore, Welcome sir on behalf of SISTecE I would like to welcome and thanks to you that you have spare time for our listeners and giving them insights of the trending Technologies. Rohit by you know getting into the technology we just wanted to highlight some of your projects and your journey specifically over to you.

In 2020, OpenText surveyed 125 pharmaceutical executives to determine how familiar each respondent is with AI technologies within their industry. The survey results revealed that an interest in AI increased to 85% in 2020, up from 47% in 2018, when a previous similar survey was conducted. Approximately 75% of respondents indicated they intend to or plan on using data scientists' analytics centers of excellence. Unlike with previous OpenText surveys, respondents indicated that issues with regulation and promotional content shy rocked to the top of the least organized areas, as opposed to document management and processing of regulatory submissions, which were well-defined areas. The incorporation of AI into the pharma industry provides a number of tangible advantages. Further findings from the recent OpenText survey revealed, the percentage of companies looking at next-generation technologies dropped from 23% in 2018 to 19% in 2020.

Here at Newsflash Online, we know that there has been a lot of concern from some quarters concerning the potential of automation and artificial intelligence (AI) to replace human jobs. A new survey suggests, however, that those businesses that were currently rolling out AI were also more likely to be recruiting people as they did so. The survey, carried out by Dun & Bradstreet at the AI World Conference and Expo in Boston, found that 40% of such companies were adding new jobs and actively recruiting. A fifth of companies surveyed in full AI deployment Most companies surveyed had moved beyond the awareness and early adoption stages and were now involved in the implementation of AI. 20% were at the stage of full deployment. As the survey was carried out at an AI conference, respondents were always likely to be more advanced than businesses as a whole.

Artificial intelligence (AI) technology is currently creating more jobs than it is replacing at large enterprises, with 40% adding human jobs as they roll out AI. Only 8% of enterprises surveyed by Dun & Bradstreet at a recent conference on artificial intelligence said they were cutting jobs as a result of AI, and 34% said demand for people remained unchanged. The survey, which had 100 respondents, was conducted at the recent AI World Conference and Expo in US city Boston. It found that most companies had move beyond awareness and early-stage adoption of AI, to implementation and determining what value the technology provides, with 20% at the stage of full deployment. Only 11% said they were not deploying AI, while the rest were at different stages.

Out of these four primary nodes, the supply chain passes through millions of people along the way from harvesting the resource, distribution of the products and shelving the products for sales. When there are defects in a product, it becomes difficult for the manufacturer to trace the root of the problem. Another issue stems from unethical supply chain management to achieve cost savings. As globalisation starts to pick up the pace, Nike was exposed as the epitome of'sweatshop labour'. In order to save cost, companies would outsource production to low-cost suppliers situated in developing countries.

Automation and artificial intelligence (AI) are often cited as delivering efficiencies in business. Now a quarter of surveyed Australians think that technology should be used to replace our politicians too. Just a fortnight after Australians were handed a new Prime Minister – the sixth in the last decade – tech management firm OpenText released the findings of a survey on the role of AI in government. It found that 27 per cent believe AI would make better decisions than elected politicians. However, they still want humans kept in the loop to make final decisions.

AI's influence over our world will continue to grow, but it remains a technology in its infancy – however, missteps along the way shouldn't detract from the greater good it promises, says Lenore Kerrigan, country sales director for enterprise information management group, OpenText. In Davos 2018, the great and powerful debated the ethics of Artificial Intelligence (AI), with UK Prime Minister Theresa May launching the UK's Centre for Data Ethics and Innovation. The aim of this advisory body is to work closely with international partners to build a common understanding of how to ensure the safe, ethical and innovative deployment of AI. The move echoes a 2000-year-old debate by Roman poet Juvenal who asked, "Who guards the guardsmen?" The question probed at the very heart of power and its abuse, because if powerful people dictate how the world works, who keeps them in check?

It doesn't really matter if you use Google, Amazon or Microsoft's AI algorithms, according to experts. The real differentiator is not whether you use Lex, Azure AI or Google's machine learning tools, but the quality of your own data, speakers at OpenText's Enterprise World 2018 conference said yesterday. "The algorithms are nothing without the data," Mike Gualtieri, principal analyst at Forrester, said. "Algorithms get all the press, but the competitive advantage, the accuracy of those models, the decisions that the models can make, it all comes from the data, and the data that enterprises have is very specific to them and their customers." While Google and the other tech giants investing fortunes into machine learning models have trained their tools on billions of images, pieces of text and other media, none of these AI systems have the specific data that companies have to hand, Gualtieri explained.

It previously piloted similar technology developed by Canadian firm OpenText during its four-year investigation into fraud at Rolls-Royce which involved reviewing 30 million documents. The SFO said that technology was up to 80% cheaper than using outside counsel to review those documents and identify legally privileged material. OpenText, the "AI lawyer", goes "further than just flagging legally privileged material" an SFO spokesperson told Sky News. "It can also scan and organise information from multiple document types - PowerPoint, Outlook calendar invites, Word documents etc - displaying the information relevant to an investigation on a timeline for an investigator to then review." The SFO told Sky News they expect the system to cost "around £12m over the expected lifetime of 7 years - which is offset against the savings the new tech will bring by enhancing our ability to review and investigate in a targeted way, without solely relying on human review."

In last November's Autumn Budget, Chancellor Philip Hammond announced sweeping regulatory reforms, which he suggested will put the UK at the forefront of a post-Brexit technological revolution. To help realise this vision, the UK Government is offering rewards to individuals and teams that can develop ways to make the country's infrastructure ready for new developments, like electric and autonomous cars. The'Roads for the Future' competition, launched by Highways England and the National Infrastructure Commission (NIC), is offering £200,000 to people who can create and implement ways to adapt existing roads to fit these new technologies. The competition is particularly looking for ideas that can work on different types of roads (motorways, country lanes, etc). It is also looking at ways to ensure the safety of autonomous vehicles.