Goto

Collaborating Authors

 innovation


Everything, eco-where, AI at once?

AIHub

There are even depictions of small waste-collecting or plant-seeder robots in a future where Earth has been abandoned as a trash-covered wasteland (as in WALL-E).


Want to beat Wordle? Try a 1940s mathematical theory.

Popular Science

Technology Want to beat Wordle? Try a 1940s mathematical theory. A new strategy found the correct word 99 percent of the time. More information Adding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results. Wordle is currently celebrating its fifth anniversary and a team from Binghamton University has a new way to solve the fun word game.


Position: Require Frontier AILabs To Release Small " Analog " Models Shriyash Upadhyay Martian Chaithanya Bandi Martian Narmeen Oozeer Martian Philip Quirke Martian

Neural Information Processing Systems

Recent proposals for regulating frontier AI models have sparked concerns about the cost of safety regulation, and most such regulations have been shelved due to the safety-innovation tradeoff. This paper argues for an alternative regulatory approach that ensures AI safety while actively promoting innovation: mandating that large AI laboratories release small, openly accessible "analog models"--scaled-down versions trained similarly to and distilled from their largest proprietary models. Analog models serve as public proxies, allowing broad participation in safety verification, interpretability research, and algorithmic transparency without forcing labs to disclose their full-scale models. Recent research demonstrates that safety and interpretability methods developed using these smaller models generalize effectively to frontier-scale systems. By enabling the wider research community to directly investigate and innovate upon accessible analogs, our policy substantially reduces the regulatory burden and accelerates safety advancements. This mandate promises minimal additional costs, leveraging reusable resources like data and infrastructure, while significantly contributing to the public good. Our hope is not only that this policy be adopted, but that it illustrates a broader principle supporting fundamental research in machine learning: deeper understanding of models relaxes the safety-innovation tradeoff and lets us have more of both.


Fostering the Ecosystem of AI for Social Impact Requires Expanding and Strengthening Evaluation Standards

Neural Information Processing Systems

There has been increasing research interest in AI/ML for social impact, and correspondingly more publication venues have refined review criteria for practice-driven AI/ML research. However, these review guidelines tend to most concretely recognize projects that simultaneously achieve deployment and novel ML methodological innovation. We argue that this introduces incentives for researchers that undermine the sustainability of a broader research ecosystem of social impact, which benefits from projects that make contributions on single front (applied or methodological) that may better meet project partner needs. Our position is that researchers and reviewers in machine learning for social impact must simultaneously adopt: 1) a more expansive conception of social impacts beyond deployment and 2) more rigorous evaluations of the impact of deployed systems.


1ae5c1db7569a6c2f395020765b119a4-Paper-Position_Paper_Track.pdf

Neural Information Processing Systems

Artificial intelligence (AI) now permeates critical infrastructures and decisionmaking systems where failures produce social, economic, and democratic harm. This position paper challenges the entrenched belief that regulation and innovation are opposites. As evidenced by analogies from aviation, pharmaceuticals, and welfare systems and recent cases of synthetic misinformation, bias and unaccountable decision-making, the absence of well-designed regulation has already created immeasurable damage. Regulation, when thoughtful and adaptive, is not a brake on innovation--it is its foundation. The present position paper examines the EU AIAct as a model of risk-based, responsibility-driven regulation that addresses the Collingridge Dilemma: acting early enough to prevent harm, yet flexibly enough to sustain innovation. Its adaptive mechanisms--regulatory sandboxes, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) support, real-world testing, fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA)--demonstrate how regulation can accelerate responsibly, rather than delay, technological progress. The position paper summarises how governance tools transform perceived burdens into tangible advantages: legal certainty, consumer trust, and ethical competitiveness.


AI-Researcher: Autonomous Scientific Innovation

Neural Information Processing Systems

The powerful reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) in mathematics and coding, combined with their ability to automate complex tasks through agentic frameworks, present unprecedented opportunities for accelerating scientific innovation. In this paper, we introduce AI-Researcher, a fully autonomous research system that transforms how AI-driven scientific discovery is conducted and evaluated.


Physics-informed machine learning with domain decomposition and global dynamics for three-dimensional intersecting flows

Neural Information Processing Systems

Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) have emerged as a promising framework to develop complex scientific surrogate models, yet their scalability and accuracy often degrade in non-canonical geometries, such as non-rectangular domains or three-dimensional (3D) domains with high aspect ratios. These limitations hinder the broader adoption of vanilla PINNs in real-world, practical systems. In this work, we introduce a multi-domain PINN (MDPINN) framework designed to address the scalability and generalization challenges inherent in 3D non-rectangular domains governed by nonlinear fluid dynamics. The target domain consists of intersecting 3D fluid channels with a high aspect ratio, inducing complex flow features such as deflections, mixing, and recirculations. Our approach is grounded in two key innovations: 1) domain decomposition, which partitions the channel volumes into multiple cubic-like subdomains, each modeled by an individual PINN, 2) enforcement of global dynamics (MDPINN-GD), which ensures that the total mass flow rate entering the domain equals that exiting. These innovations reduce the complexity of the problem imposed on individual PINNs and guide effective network optimization toward physically consistent solutions throughout the domain. We demonstrate that our method achieves: 1) 74.8\% accuracy improvement over a single-network PINN, and 2) 52.9\% accuracy improvement over MDPINN that do not enforce global mass conservation. Furthermore, the MDPINN-GD framework exhibits accurate prediction even in highly complex regions-such as the channel intersecting zone and the outlet zone characterized by intense flow mixing and large velocity gradients-achieving maximum normalized mean absolute errors below 14.9\% for velocity predictions compared to simulation results. This work establishes a path towards scalable, physically grounded surrogate modeling approach that is extensible to multiphysics and high-dimensional scientific problems.


Position: If Innovation in AI systematically Violates Fundamental Rights, Is It Innovation at All?

Neural Information Processing Systems

Artificial intelligence (AI) now permeates critical infrastructures and decisionmaking systems where failures produce social, economic, and democratic harm. This position paper challenges the entrenched belief that regulation and innovation are opposites. As evidenced by analogies from aviation, pharmaceuticals, and welfare systems and recent cases of synthetic misinformation, bias and unaccountable decision-making, the absence of well-designed regulation has already created immeasurable damage. Regulation, when thoughtful and adaptive, is not a brake on innovation--it is its foundation. The present position paper examines the EU AI Act as a model of risk-based, responsibility-driven regulation that addresses the Collingridge Dilemma: acting early enough to prevent harm, yet flexibly enough to sustain innovation. Its adaptive mechanisms--regulatory sandboxes, small and medium enterprises (SMEs) support, real-world testing, fundamental rights impact assessment (FRIA)--demonstrate how regulation can accelerate responsibly, rather than delay, technological progress. The position paper summarises how governance tools transform perceived burdens into tangible advantages: legal certainty, consumer trust, and ethical competitiveness.


Giant 120-sided 'Dungeons and Dragons' dice highlights every element

Popular Science

Science Giant 120-sided'Dungeons and Dragons' dice highlights every element The chunky aluminum die is perfect for roleplaying games and chemistry class. More information Adding us as a Preferred Source in Google by using this link indicates that you would like to see more of our content in Google News results. Breakthroughs, discoveries, and DIY tips sent six days a week. By signing up, you confirm you are 16+, will receive newsletters and promotional content and agree to our Terms of Use and acknowledge the data practices in our Privacy Policy . Part of ' enduring charm is the game's seemingly infinite possibilities.


AnimateQR: Bridging Aesthetics and Functionality in Dynamic QR Code Generation

Neural Information Processing Systems

Animated QR codes present an exciting frontier for dynamic content delivery and digital interaction. However, despite their potential, there has been no prior work focusing on the generation of animated QR codes that are both visually appealing and universally scannable.