Fox News Flash top headlines are here. Check out what's clicking on Foxnews.com. The U.S. government's highway safety agency is sending a team to Detroit to investigate a crash involving a Tesla that drove beneath a semitrailer. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says Monday night that a special crash investigation team will go to the city to investigate the "violent crash." Two people were critically injured in the crash that happened last Thursday on the city's southwest side.

The U.S. government's highway safety agency is sending a team to Detroit to investigate a crash involving a Tesla that drove beneath a semitrailer. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration says Monday night that a special crash investigation team will go to the city to investigate the "violent crash." Two people were critically injured in the crash that happened last Thursday on the city's southwest side. The crash circumstances are similar to two others in Florida in which Teslas drove beneath tractor-trailers, causing two deaths. In both crashes, in 2016 and 2019, the cars were being driven while using Tesla's Autopilot partially automated driving software.

The National Transport Safety Board (NTSB) suggests Tesla is using customers as'guinea pigs' to test its autonomous driving technology before it is officially approved and is blaming its sister agency for letting it happen. In a letter to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), NTSB is calling for stricter requirements for design and use automated driving systems on public roads, CNBC reports. Tesla is named 16 times in the document, mainly due to the fact it released its'Full Self-Driving' FSD) beta version to the public'with limited oversight or reporting requirements.' Although NTSB points to the Elon Musk-owned firm for its lack of safeguarding, the agency is also slamming NHTSA for its'hands-off approach' to monitor such testing on public roads. Tesla first launched its FSD beta program in October to a limited number of customers who were deemed'expert and careful drivers.'

People in all kinds of industries are debating artificial intelligence (AI) pros and cons. AI pros and cons are going to shape future generations – and, indeed, the whole future of our species. Today, however, science fiction is still just a story. When you're thinking about AI and what it can do, it's important to recognize its limitations. But it's also vital to remember just how quickly it has moved forward. Seeing both sides of the coin lets you really understand where AI is excellent and where it still has serious shortcomings. One thing is for sure: You should be using AI.

The Trump administration has a simple approach to regulating artificial intelligence: developers pretty much have free reign to experiment. At a meeting with representatives of 40 companies including Google, Facebook and Intel, White House science advisor Michael Kratsios said the administration will avoid AI regulations for the foreseeable future, Bloomberg reported. Kratsios noted the government did not get in the way of Alexander Graham Bell or the Wright brothers when they invented the telephone and airplane, suggesting that a loose regulatory approach was vital for innovation and could keep the US at the forefront of AI development. The hands-off tactic reflects Trump's broader free-market approach to governing. The Obama administration was reluctant to impose AI rules as well, though it wanted companies to make sure their software worked safely and securely.