Billed as the "world's first museum of AI arts," Dataland uses wearables and troves of material from the Amazon to merge nature, biometrics, and art. "I think we are literally in a renaissance," says the artist Refik Anadol, in a characteristically optimistic comment, when asked how he sees this moment in art history, with artificial intelligence ascendant yet controversial as a medium. "We just don't have a name for it yet." Anadol, known for technological installations that probe the relationship between humans and machines, has reason to be happy. On June 20, Dataland, the cutting-edge downtown Los Angeles gallery he cofounded with studio partner Efsun Erkılıç, opened its doors to an eager public.

Warning: This method may be misused for malicious purposes. Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-risk domains.

Contrastive decoding strategies are widely used to reduce object hallucinations in multimodal large language models (MLLMs). These methods work by constructing contrastive samples to induce hallucinations and then suppressing them in the output distribution. However, this paper demonstrates that such approaches fail to effectively mitigate the hallucination problem. The performance improvements observed on POPE Benchmark are largely driven by two misleading factors: (1) crude, unidirectional adjustments to the model's output distribution and (2) the adaptive plausibility constraint, which reduces the sampling strategy to greedy search. To further illustrate these issues, we introduce a series of spurious improvement methods and evaluate their performance against contrastive decoding techniques. Experimental results reveal that the observed performance gains in contrastive decoding are entirely unrelated to its intended goal of mitigating hallucinations. Our findings challenge common assumptions about the effectiveness of contrastive decoding strategies and pave the way for developing genuinely effective solutions to hallucinations in MLLMs.

Hallucinations present a significant challenge in the development and evaluation of large language models (LLMs), directly affecting their reliability and accuracy. While notable advancements have been made in research on textual and visual hallucinations, there is still a lack of a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating auditory hallucinations in large audio language models (LALMs). To fill this gap, we introduce AHa-Bench, a systematic and comprehensive benchmark for audio hallucinations. Audio data, in particular, uniquely combines the multi-attribute complexity of visual data with the semantic richness of textual data, leading to auditory hallucinations that share characteristics with both visual and textual hallucinations. Based on the source of these hallucinations, AHa-Bench categorizes them into semantic hallucinations, acoustic hallucinations, and semantic-acoustic confusion hallucinations. In addition, we systematically evaluate seven opensource local perception language models (LALMs), demonstrating the challenges these models face in audio understanding, especially when it comes to jointly understanding semantic and acoustic information. Through the development of a comprehensive evaluation framework, AHa-Bench aims to enhance robustness of LALMs, fostering more reliable and nuanced audio understanding in LALMs.

Although multimodal large language models (MLLMs) exhibit remarkable reasoning capabilities on complex multimodal understanding tasks, they still suffer from the notorious "hallucination" issue: generating outputs misaligned with obvious visual or factual evidence. Currently, training-based solutions, like direct preference optimization (DPO), leverage paired preference data to suppress hallucinations. However, they risk sacrificing general reasoning capabilities due to the likelihood displacement. Meanwhile, training-free solutions, like contrastive decoding, achieve this goal by subtracting the estimated hallucination pattern from a distorted input. Yet, these handcrafted perturbations (e.g., add noise to images) may poorly capture authentic hallucination patterns. To avoid these weaknesses of existing methods, and realize "robust" hallucination mitigation (i.e., maintaining general reasoning performance), we propose a novel framework: Decoupling Contrastive Decoding (DCD).

Despite their outstanding performance in numerous applications, large language models (LLMs) remain prone to hallucinations, generating content inconsistent with their pretraining corpora. Currently, almost all contrastive decoding approaches alleviate hallucinations by introducing a model susceptible to hallucinations and appropriately widening the contrastive logits gap between hallucinatory tokens and target tokens. However, although existing contrastive decoding methods mitigate hallucinations, they lack enough confidence in the factual accuracy of the generated content. In this work, we propose Multi-Model Contrastive Decoding (MCD), which integrates a pretrained language model with an evil model and a truthful model for contrastive decoding. Intuitively, a token is assigned a high probability only when deemed potentially hallucinatory by the evil model while being considered factual by the truthful model. This decoding strategy significantly enhances the model's confidence in its generated responses and reduces potential hallucinations. Furthermore, we introduce a dynamic hallucination detection mechanism that facilitates token-by-token identification of hallucinations during generation and a tree-based revision mechanism to diminish hallucinations further. Extensive experimental evaluations demonstrate that our MCD strategy effectively reduces hallucinations in LLMs and outperforms state-of-the-art methods across various benchmarks.

The development of Reasoning Large Language Models (RLLMs) has significantly improved multi-step reasoning capabilities, but it has also made hallucination problems more frequent and harder to eliminate. While existing approaches address hallucination through external knowledge integration, model parameter analysis, or self-verification mechanisms, they fail to provide a comprehensive insight into how hallucinations emerge and evolve throughout the reasoning chain. In this work, we investigate hallucination causality under constrained knowledge domains by auditing the Chain-of-Thought (CoT) trajectory and assessing the model's cognitive confidence in potentially erroneous or biased claims. Analysis reveals that in long-CoT settings, RLLMs may iteratively reinforce biases and errors through flawed reflective processes, ultimately inducing hallucinated reasoning paths. Counterintuitively, even with interventions at hallucination origins, reasoning chains display pronounced "chain disloyalty", resisting correction and sustaining flawed trajectories. We further point out that existing hallucination detection methods are less reliable and interpretable than previously assumed, especially in complex multi-step reasoning contexts. Unlike circuit tracing that requires access to model parameters, our auditing enables more interpretable long-chain hallucination attribution in black-box settings, demonstrating stronger generalizability and practical utility. Our code is available at this link.

LLMs have demonstrated unprecedented capabilities in natural language processing, yet their practical deployment remains hindered by persistent factuality and faithfulness hallucinations. While existing methods address these hallucination types independently, they inadvertently induce performance trade-offs, as interventions targeting one type often exacerbate the other. Through empirical and theoretical analysis of activation space dynamics in LLMs, we reveal that these hallucination categories share overlapping subspaces within neural representations, presenting an opportunity for concurrent mitigation. To harness this insight, we propose SPACE, a unified framework that jointly enhances factuality and faithfulness by editing shared activation subspaces. SPACE establishes a geometric foundation for shared subspace existence through dual-task feature modeling, then identifies and edits these subspaces via a hybrid probe strategy combining spectral clustering and attention head saliency scoring. Experimental results across multiple benchmark datasets demonstrate the superiority of our approach.

Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly deployed in high-risk domains.

Domain Adaptation of Black-box Predictors (DABP) transfers knowledge from a labeled source domain to an unlabeled target domain, without requiring access to either source data or source model. Common practices of DABP leverage reliable samples to suppress negative information about unreliable samples. However, there are still some problems: i) Excessive attention to reliable sample aggregation leads to premature overfitting; ii) Valuable information in unreliable samples is often overlooked. To address them, we propose a novel spatial learning approach, called Controlled Visual Hallucination via Thalamus-driven Decoupling Network (CVHTDN). Specifically, CVH-TDN is the first work that introduces the thalamus-driven decoupling network in the visual task, relying on its connection with hallucination to control the direction of sample generation in feature space. CVH-TDN is composed of Hallucination Generation (HG), Hallucination Alignment (HA), and Hallucination Calibration (HC), aiming to explore the spatial relationship information between samples and hallucinations. Extensive experiments confirm that CVH-TDN achieves SOTA performance on four standard benchmarks.