We study the query complexity of sampling from high-dimensional Gaussian distributions using gradient information. In the standard oracle model, exact gradients expose only matrix-vector products with the precision matrix, leading to polynomial approximation barriers and a characteristic \(\sqrtκ\) dependence on the condition number. We show that this barrier disappears when the sampler is allowed to query \emph{smoothed scores}, namely gradients of the logarithms of the Gaussian-convolved densities. For a Gaussian target with precision matrix \(Λ\), a smoothed-score query at noise level \(τ\) gives access to the resolvent \((Λ+τ^{-1}I)^{-1}\). Combining geometrically spaced noise levels with sinc-quadrature rational approximation, we obtain a sampler with $q=O\!\left(\bigl(\logκ+\log(e\sqrt d/δ_{\rm TV})\bigr)\log(e\sqrt d/δ_{\rm TV})\right)$ smoothed-score queries for total variation error \(δ_{\rm TV}\), improving the condition-number dependence from \(\sqrtκ\) to logarithmic. We also study finite-bit gradient oracles. Using coordinatewise quantization of the transformed smoothed-score answers and a final dithering step, we obtain a sampling scheme whose total communicated gradient information is polylogarithmic in \(κ\); in particular, for fixed dimension and accuracy, the bit complexity is \(O(\log^2κ)\). To complement these upper bounds, we introduce a channel-synthesis, or reverse-Shannon, converse technique for sampling lower bounds. This converts total-variation simulation guarantees into communication requirements and yields an \(Ω(\logκ)\) lower bound on the required gradient information. Together, these results identify smoothed scores as a provably more informative oracle for sampling and give nearly matching upper and lower bounds for its finite-bit complexity.

We design a class of additive noise mechanisms that satisfy \((\varepsilon, δ)\)-differential privacy (DP) for scalar, real-valued query functions with known sensitivities, with a particular focus on moderate and low-privacy regimes. These mechanisms, which we call \textit{mixture mechanisms}, are constructed by mixing multiple Gaussian distributions that share the same variance but differ in their means and mixture weights. The resulting distributions can be interpreted as convex combinations of a zero-mean Gaussian (as used in the analytic Gaussian mechanism) and additional Gaussians whose means depend on the sensitivity of the query function. We derive tight conditions on the variances required for \((\varepsilon, δ)\)-DP and provide efficient algorithms to compute them. Compared to the analytic Gaussian mechanism, our mechanisms yield substantially lower expected noise amplitudes (\(l_1\)-loss) and variances (\(l_2\)-loss for zero-mean distributions). In the low-privacy regime that motivates our design, our mechanisms approach optimality, mitigating nearly all of the optimality gap of the analytic Gaussian mechanism.

Evaluating large language models increasingly relies on LLM-as-a-judge protocols, but such evaluations remain costly: different judges have different prices and reliabilities, and the difficulty of each prompt-response pair can vary substantially. This raises a basic allocation question: under a fixed budget, how should one distribute evaluation queries across heterogeneous judges and instances to obtain the most accurate score estimates? We formalize this question as *budgeted heteroskedastic multi-judge estimation*. Given $K$ prompt-response pairs, $J$ judges with known costs, and unknown query-judge variances, the goal is to estimate a bounded score vector while minimizing an $\ell_p$-error. Our first contribution is to analyze the inverse-variance weighted estimator (IVWE) and to derive the oracle allocation that minimizes its error rate. Since this allocation depends on the unknown variances, we then address the practical unknown-variance setting by proposing EST-IVWE, an adaptive algorithm that constructs and leverages *optimistically biased* variance estimates to stabilize the empirical allocation. We prove that EST-IVWE matches the oracle IVWE rate up to lower-order terms in the budget. Our second and central theoretical contribution is a matching *local* minimax lower bound, which establishes the instance-optimality of the proposed algorithms. A key technical insight is that Fano-type high-probability arguments are too coarse for this problem: their packing construction loses the local variance structure that governs the optimal allocation. We instead use an Assouad-type in-expectation argument, based on local perturbations, which preserves this structure and yields the sharp allocation-dependent lower bound. Finally, we numerically validate the superiority of our approach over naïve uniform allocation on synthetic and HelpSteer2 datasets.

Neural processes amortize Gaussian process inference, replacing the exact $O(n^3)$ posterior with a learned $O(n)$ map from context sets to predictive distributions. For a class of latent neural processes, we bound the Kullback--Leibler (KL) divergence between the GP and LNP predictives, decomposing it into three interpretable sources, namely label contamination as the neural process uses label values to estimate a quantity that is label-independent in the exact GP, an information bottleneck because the finite-dimensional representation cannot resolve the full context geometry, and amortization error from a single encoder network shared across all contexts. The bottleneck truncation term decays in the representation dimension $d$ as $O(e^{-cd^{2/d_x}})$ for squared-exponential kernels on $\mathbb{R}^{d_x}$ where $c > 0$ is a kernel-dependent constant and as $O(d^{-2ν/d_x})$ for Matérn-$ν$ kernels, directly linking architecture sizing to kernel smoothness and input dimension. The label contamination term is $O(1)$ in general, with only the observation-noise component decaying as $O(1/n)$, identifying a persistent cost of routing uncertainty estimation through a label-dependent representation. These results characterize the costs of amortization within the analyzed class and yield architectural recommendations to predict variance from context locations alone in the GP-amortization regime, and replace mean aggregation with second-order pooling to close the dominant amortization gap.

Compositional score-based approaches to simulation-based inference (SBI) approximate the posterior over a shared parameter given $n$ independent observations by aggregating individually learned posterior scores: currently, there are two main propositions of such methods (Geffner et al. (2023), Linhart et al. (2026)). As the resulting composite score does not correspond to the score of any distribution along the forward diffusion path of the true multi-observation posterior, sampling from it via a reverse SDE leads to an irreducible bias. Annealed Langevin dynamics provides a principled alternative: it treats the composite score as the genuine score of a sequence of tractable bridging densities and samples from them in succession. When properly tuned, it could lead to a controllable bias. However, its hyperparameters, namely step sizes, the number of steps per level, and the number of annealing levels, have so far been chosen empirically. We derive Wasserstein bounds for annealed Langevin with approximate scores and translate them into explicit decision rules for these hyperparameters that guarantee a prescribed sampling accuracy, while highlighting different theoretical aspects of each composite score formulation. In the Gaussian setting, we obtain closed-form expressions for all relevant quantities and prove that the bridging densities of Linhart et al. (2026) consistently admit larger step sizes and require fewer total Langevin steps than those of Geffner et al. (2023). Furthermore, we show empirically that the tuning obtained in the Gaussian setting generalizes to more complex problems, thus providing a well-understood and theoretically grounded starting point for practitioners using compositional score-based approaches.

We introduce DeRegiME -- Deep Regime Mixture of Experts -- a direct multi-horizon probabilistic forecaster that separates latent uncertainty regimes from the underlying signal and softly assigns each forecast location to learned recurring regimes using a sparse variational Gaussian process (GP) whose nonstationary regime-mixing kernel and Student-t likelihood combine per-regime sub-kernels and noise processes via a shared gate. This yields a single sparse-GP posterior, not a mixture of GP experts. DeRegiME addresses a key limitation of neural forecasters: point forecasts discard residual uncertainty, and probabilistic heads -- whether single marginals, uninterpreted mixtures, quantile sets, or diffusion samples -- rarely expose the regime structure of the residual. Yet distribution shift in noisy heteroskedastic time series may be abrupt, gradual, or horizon-dependent and often appears in residual uncertainty rather than the conditional mean. DeRegiME yields an interpretable mean-residual-noise decomposition with a direct-sum feature-space representation that anchors regimes as clusters of residual similarity whose transitions surface as implicit changepoints. The effective number of regimes is pruned by the stick-breaking gate. We prove kernel validity and predictive-density propriety, and across ten benchmarks and three encoder grids DeRegiME improves negative log predictive density (NLPD) by 20.3% over the strongest encoder-matched baseline, a DeepAR/GluonTS-style dynamic Student-t head, with parallel gains on CRPS (3.0%) and MSE (4.7%). Improvements are consistent across all datasets, which span abrupt, gradual, and seasonal shifts.

This raises a fundamental dilemma of statistical-computational tradeoffs: removing all samples from an unwanted domain may be computationally prohibitive, while randomly removing a subset may not provide distribution-level statistical guarantees. We propose a statistical framework for distributional unlearning, in which domains are modeled as probability distributions, and the goal is to remove a carefully chosen subset of samples that reduces the effect of an unwanted distribution while preserving performance on a desired one. We formalize this using a hypothesis test of the edited data with the desired and unwanted domains, leading to an interpretable and robust criterion for selecting samples to remove. Within this statistical framework, we characterize the fundamental region of the allowable edited data distributions and the removal-preservation Pareto frontier for a broad class of distribution families. This includes parametric families such as shifted Gaussians of arbitrary dimension, a one-dimensional location family with log-concave noise, and the one-dimensional Poisson family. It also includes nonparametric families such as the Gaussian white noise model, a canonical model for nonparametric regression. We prove composition rules that describe how distributional unlearning behaves across multimodal unwanted domains, and introduce a central-limit behavior for the removal-preservation baselines when composing a large number of such families. Finally, we provide finite sample guarantees by providing Pareto frontiers for some selection algorithms, and observe an information-computation gap.

We revisit the problem of robust linear regression under Gaussian covariates with an unknown covariance matrix of condition number $κ$. For this fundamental problem, significant gaps remain in our understanding of the trade-offs among sample complexity, condition number, runtime, and prediction error for efficient algorithms. Our first result is a near-linear-time algorithm that uses $\widetilde{O}(d/ε^4)$ samples, where $d$ is the dimension and $ε$ is the corruption rate, and achieves prediction error $O(\sqrt{εκ})$ under the condition $εκ\lesssim 1$, improving over all prior works. We complement this result with a Statistical Query (SQ) lower bound showing that efficient SQ algorithms achieving error $o(\sqrt{εκ})$ when $εκ\lesssim 1$ require queries that take $Ω(d^2)$ samples to simulate. Finally, we prove a low-degree polynomial lower bound that gives fine-grained evidence that, without assumptions such as $εκ\lesssim 1$, efficient algorithms may require $\tildeΩ\left(\min\{dε^{2}κ^{2},\ ε^{2}d^{2}\}\right)$ samples to significantly outperform the trivial estimator that always guesses $0$.

Uncertainty quantification is essential in safety-critical settings--from autonomous driving to aviation, finance, and health--where decisions must rely on conservative bounds rather than point estimates. Predictor-level intervals (e.g., from quantile regression, conformal prediction, variance networks, or Bayesian models) generally do not compose: adding two per-variable intervals need not yield a valid interval for their sum or preserve coverage. In aviation, Gaussian overbounding replaces complex error distributions with a conservative Gaussian whose tails dominate the truth, so conservatism propagates through linear operations. Yet classical overbounds are global, often overly conservative, and hard to adapt to feature-conditioned errors. We propose a unified learning framework that trains neural networks to produce context-aware Gaussian overbounds--mean and scale--with provable conservatism on a finite quantile grid and, under three explicit regularity assumptions, continuous-tail conservatism on a certified interval. Our overbounding loss enforces conservativeness at selected quantiles while penalizing distributional distance with a Wasserstein-style term. The learned bounds support conservative linear-combination and convolution analysis on the enforced grid, and on the certified interval when assumptions hold, while being less redundant than traditional methods. We provide a scoped analysis of discrete-to-continuous conservatism and compact-domain objective regularity, and validate on synthetic data and real-world datasets, including multipath, ionospheric, and tropospheric residual errors. Across these settings, the method yields tighter bounds while maintaining conservatism on the enforced grid and in experiments. The framework is modality-agnostic and applicable to learning systems that require conservative, feature-conditioned uncertainty estimates in dynamic environments.

Density estimation and reliable prediction regions for outputs are crucial in supervised and unsupervised learning. While conformal prediction effectively generates coverage-guaranteed regions, it struggles with multi-dimensional outputs due to reliance on one-dimensional nonconformity scores. To address this, we introduce CONTRA: CONformal prediction region via normalizing flow TRAnsformation. CONTRA utilizes the latent spaces of normalizing flows to define nonconformity scores based on distances from the center. This allows for the mapping of high-density regions in latent space to sharp prediction regions in the output space, surpassing traditional hyperrectangular or elliptical conformal regions. Further, for scenarios where other predictive models are favored over flow-based models, we extend CONTRA to enhance any such model with a reliable prediction region by training a simple normalizing flow on the residuals. We demonstrate that both CONTRA and its extension maintain guaranteed coverage probability and outperform existing methods in generating accurate prediction regions across various datasets. We conclude that CONTRA is an effective tool for (conditional) density estimation, addressing the under-explored challenge of delivering multi-dimensional prediction regions.