Despite the notable success of deep neural networks (DNNs) in solving complex tasks, the training process still remains considerable challenges. A primary obstacle is the substantial time required for training, particularly as high performing DNNs tend to become increasingly deep (characterized by a larger number of hidden layers) and require extensive training datasets. To address these challenges, this paper introduces a distributed training method that integrates two prominent strategies for accelerating deep learning: data parallelism and fully decoupled parallel backpropagation algorithm. By utilizing multiple computational units operating in parallel, the proposed approach enhances the amount of training data processed in each iteration while mitigating locking issues commonly associated with the backpropagation algorithm. These features collectively contribute to significant improvements in training efficiency. The proposed distributed training method is rigorously proven to converge to critical points under certain conditions. Its effectiveness is further demonstrated through empirical evaluations, wherein an DNN is trained to perform classification tasks on the CIFAR-10 dataset.

Robotic manipulation within dynamic environments presents challenges to precise control and adaptability. Traditional fixed-view camera systems face challenges adapting to change viewpoints and scale variations, limiting perception and manipulation precision. To tackle these issues, we propose the Active Vision-driven Robotic (AVR) framework, a teleoperation hardware solution that supports dynamic viewpoint and dynamic focal length adjustments to continuously center targets and maintain optimal scale, accompanied by a corresponding algorithm that effectively enhances the success rates of various operational tasks. Using the RoboTwin platform with a real-time image processing plugin, AVR framework improves task success rates by 5%-16% on five manipulation tasks. Physical deployment on a dual-arm system demonstrates in collaborative tasks and 36% precision in screwdriver insertion, outperforming baselines by over 25%. Experimental results confirm that AVR framework enhances environmental perception, manipulation repeatability (40% $\le $1 cm error), and robustness in complex scenarios, paving the way for future robotic precision manipulation methods in the pursuit of human-level robot dexterity and precision.

Robotics can help address the growing worker shortage challenge of the manufacturing industry. As such, machine tending is a task collaborative robots can tackle that can also highly boost productivity. Nevertheless, existing robotics systems deployed in that sector rely on a fixed single-arm setup, whereas mobile robots can provide more flexibility and scalability. In this work, we introduce a multi-agent multi-machine tending learning framework by mobile robots based on Multi-agent Reinforcement Learning (MARL) techniques with the design of a suitable observation and reward. Moreover, an attention-based encoding mechanism is developed and integrated into Multi-agent Proximal Policy Optimization (MAPPO) algorithm to boost its performance for machine tending scenarios. Our model (AB-MAPPO) outperformed MAPPO in this new challenging scenario in terms of task success, safety, and resources utilization. Furthermore, we provided an extensive ablation study to support our various design decisions.

Examples range from multiagent planning, That is, we look for the most representative voter and return to crowdsourcing and human computation, to collaborative her ballot as the outcome. In our example, a natural choice filtering for recommender systems, to rank aggregation would be any of the voters voting (0, 1, 1). The distance of for search engines, to coordination and resource allocation this choice to the individual ballots is 42 (21 voters disagree in multiagent systems. Several frameworks have been on 2 issues each), i.e., this solution is only marginally worse proposed in the literature on computational social choice than the solution returned by the distance-based rule--and it (Chevaleyre et al. 2007; Brandt, Conitzer, and Endriss 2013) is optimal in case (1, 1, 1) is infeasible.