Tab. 4 provides detailed statistics of the two datasets. B.2 Clinical Predictive T asks We focus on two common clinical predictive tasks: readmission prediction and mortality prediction. In the case of the eICU dataset, the predictions are made 12 hours after admission. The overall prevalence for these tasks is 15% for readmission and 4% for mortality. For the MIMIC-IV dataset, the predictions are made at the time of discharge.

This paper explores the complex tradeoffs between various fairness metrics such as equalized odds, disparate impact, and equal opportunity and predictive accuracy within COMPAS by building neural networks trained with custom loss functions optimized to specific fairness criteria. This paper creates the first fairness-driven implementation of the novel Group Accuracy Parity (GAP) framework, as theoretically proposed by Gupta et al. (2024), and applies it to COMPAS. To operationalize and accurately compare the fairness of COMPAS models optimized to differing fairness ideals, this paper develops and proposes a combinatory analytical procedure that incorporates Pareto front and multivariate analysis, leveraging data visualizations such as violin graphs. This paper concludes that GAP achieves an enhanced equilibrium between fairness and accuracy compared to COMPAS's current nationwide implementation and alternative implementations of COMPAS optimized to more traditional fairness definitions. While this paper's algorithmic improvements of COMPAS significantly augment its fairness, external biases undermine the fairness of its implementation. Practices such as predictive policing and issues such as the lack of transparency regarding COMPAS's internal workings have contributed to the algorithm's historical injustice. In conjunction with developments regarding COMPAS's predictive methodology, legal and institutional changes must happen for COMPAS's just deployment.

While large language models (LLMs) show promise in hospitality and tourism, their ability to provide unbiased service across demographic groups remains unclear. This paper explores gender and ethnic biases when LLMs are utilized as travel planning assistants. To investigate this issue, we apply machine learning techniques to analyze travel suggestions generated from three open-source LLMs. Our findings reveal that the performance of race and gender classifiers substantially exceeds random chance, indicating differences in how LLMs engage with varied subgroups. Specifically, outputs align with cultural expectations tied to certain races and genders. To minimize the effect of these stereotypes, we used a stop-word classification strategy, which decreased identifiable differences, with no disrespectful terms found. However, hallucinations related to African American and gender minority groups were noted. In conclusion, while LLMs can generate travel plans seemingly free from bias, it remains essential to verify the accuracy and appropriateness of their recommendations.

In this paper, we introduce a data augmentation approach specifically tailored to enhance intersectional fairness in classification tasks. Our method capitalizes on the hierarchical structure inherent to intersectionality, by viewing groups as intersections of their parent categories. This perspective allows us to augment data for smaller groups by learning a transformation function that combines data from these parent groups. Our empirical analysis, conducted on four diverse datasets including both text and images, reveals that classifiers trained with this data augmentation approach achieve superior intersectional fairness and are more robust to ``leveling down'' when compared to methods optimizing traditional group fairness metrics.

Vision Language Models (VLMs), exemplified by GPT-4V, adeptly integrate text and vision modalities. This integration enhances Large Language Models' ability to mimic human perception, allowing them to process image inputs. Despite VLMs' advanced capabilities, however, there is a concern that VLMs inherit biases of both modalities in ways that make biases more pervasive and difficult to mitigate. Our study explores how VLMs perpetuate homogeneity bias and trait associations with regards to race and gender. When prompted to write stories based on images of human faces, GPT-4V describes subordinate racial and gender groups with greater homogeneity than dominant groups and relies on distinct, yet generally positive, stereotypes. Importantly, VLM stereotyping is driven by visual cues rather than group membership alone such that faces that are rated as more prototypically Black and feminine are subject to greater stereotyping. These findings suggest that VLMs may associate subtle visual cues related to racial and gender groups with stereotypes in ways that could be challenging to mitigate. We explore the underlying reasons behind this behavior and discuss its implications and emphasize the importance of addressing these biases as VLMs come to mirror human perception.

This paper studies algorithmic decision-making under human's strategic behavior, where a decision maker uses an algorithm to make decisions about human agents, and the latter with information about the algorithm may exert effort strategically and improve to receive favorable decisions. Unlike prior works that assume agents benefit from their efforts immediately, we consider realistic scenarios where the impacts of these efforts are persistent and agents benefit from efforts by making improvements gradually. We first develop a dynamic model to characterize persistent improvements and based on this construct a Stackelberg game to model the interplay between agents and the decision-maker. We analytically characterize the equilibrium strategies and identify conditions under which agents have incentives to improve. With the dynamics, we then study how the decision-maker can design an optimal policy to incentivize the largest improvements inside the agent population. We also extend the model to settings where 1) agents may be dishonest and game the algorithm into making favorable but erroneous decisions; 2) honest efforts are forgettable and not sufficient to guarantee persistent improvements. With the extended models, we further examine conditions under which agents prefer honest efforts over dishonest behavior and the impacts of forgettable efforts.

This study investigates how machine learning (ML) models can predict hospital readmissions for diabetic patients fairly and accurately across different demographics (age, gender, race). We compared models like Deep Learning, Generalized Linear Models, Gradient Boosting Machines (GBM), and Naive Bayes. GBM stood out with an F1-score of 84.3% and accuracy of 82.2%, accurately predicting readmissions across demographics. A fairness analysis was conducted across all the models. GBM minimized disparities in predictions, achieving balanced results across genders and races. It showed low False Discovery Rates (FDR) (6-7%) and False Positive Rates (FPR) (5%) for both genders. Additionally, FDRs remained low for racial groups, such as African Americans (8%) and Asians (7%). Similarly, FPRs were consistent across age groups (4%) for both patients under 40 and those above 40, indicating its precision and ability to reduce bias. These findings emphasize the importance of choosing ML models carefully to ensure both accuracy and fairness for all patients. By showcasing effectiveness of various models with fairness metrics, this study promotes personalized medicine and the need for fair ML algorithms in healthcare. This can ultimately reduce disparities and improve outcomes for diabetic patients of all backgrounds.

Synthetic data generation has the potential to impact applications and domains with scarce data. However, before such data is used for sensitive tasks such as mental health, we need an understanding of how different demographics are represented in it. In our paper, we analyze the potential of producing synthetic data using GPT-3 by exploring the various stressors it attributes to different race and gender combinations, to provide insight for future researchers looking into using LLMs for data generation. Using GPT-3, we develop HEADROOM, a synthetic dataset of 3,120 posts about depression-triggering stressors, by controlling for race, gender, and time frame (before and after COVID-19). Using this dataset, we conduct semantic and lexical analyses to (1) identify the predominant stressors for each demographic group; and (2) compare our synthetic data to a human-generated dataset. We present the procedures to generate queries to develop depression data using GPT-3, and conduct analyzes to uncover the types of stressors it assigns to demographic groups, which could be used to test the limitations of LLMs for synthetic data generation for depression data. Our findings show that synthetic data mimics some of the human-generated data distribution for the predominant depression stressors across diverse demographics.

This poses challenges for applications interested in targeting specific demographics (e.g., an African American business or NGO; a voice-tutoring system for children that are not of White ethnicity, etc.). The ultimate goal of the project described in this paper is to provide to designers, developers, and enterprises the choice of having a professional voice which is clearly recognizable as African American, and therefore more able to address diversity and inclusiveness issues. Being more precise, our goal is to create an African American Text-to-Speech system, which we will refer simply as an African American voice or AA voice, able to produce synthetic audio segments from standard English texts, and which will be recognized by African American speakers and non-speakers as sounding like a native African American speaker. The AA voice should exhibit a level of technical quality similar to the Standard American English (SAE) synthetic voices currently available through professional platforms. The evaluation of the technical quality of the AA voice, however, is not addressed in this paper, which focuses primarily on whether the AA voice can be recognized as sounding like an African American speaker. Linguists [27, 28] have described a continuum of dialects under what is often termed African American Vernacular English (AAVE). At one end of the spectrum, one finds the largest deviation from SAE in terms of lexicon (including slang), syntax and morphology, and phonological/phonetic properties. At the other end, AAVE speakers begin to approach SAE in terms of lexicon and grammar but still retain marked speech characteristics (primarily in terms of intonation, phonation, and vowel placement [14, 28]) which grant the speech a distinctive identity which listeners use as cues in the perception of African American English [44].