Automated Program Repair (APR) is a task to automatically generate patches for the buggy code. However, most research focuses on generating correct patches while ignoring the consistency between the fixed code and the original buggy code. How to conduct adaptive bug fixing and generate patches with minimal modifications have seldom been investigated. To bridge this gap, we first introduce a novel task, namely AdaPR (Adaptive Program Repair). We then propose a two-stage approach AdaPatcher (Adaptive Patch Generator) to enhance program repair while maintaining the consistency. In the first stage, we utilize a Bug Locator with self-debug learning to accurately pinpoint bug locations. In the second stage, we train a Program Modifier to ensure consistency between the post-modified fixed code and the pre-modified buggy code. The Program Modifier is enhanced with a location-aware repair learning strategy to generate patches based on identified buggy lines, a hybrid training strategy for selective reference and an adaptive preference learning to prioritize fewer changes. The experimental results show that our approach outperforms a set of baselines by a large margin, validating the effectiveness of our two-stage framework for the newly proposed AdaPR task.

Traditional Incremental Learning (IL) targets to handle sequential fully-supervised learning problems where novel classes emerge from time to time. However, due to inherent annotation uncertainty and ambiguity, collecting high-quality annotated data in a dynamic learning system can be extremely expensive. To mitigate this problem, we propose a novel weakly-supervised learning paradigm called Incremental Partial Label Learning (IPLL), where the sequentially arrived data relate to a set of candidate labels rather than the ground truth. Technically, we develop the Prototype-Guided Disambiguation and Replay Algorithm (PGDR) which leverages the class prototypes as a proxy to mitigate two intertwined challenges in IPLL, i.e., label ambiguity and catastrophic forgetting. To handle the former, PGDR encapsulates a momentum-based pseudo-labeling algorithm along with prototype-guided initialization, resulting in a balanced perception of classes. To alleviate forgetting, we develop a memory replay technique that collects well-disambiguated samples while maintaining representativeness and diversity. By jointly distilling knowledge from curated memory data, our framework exhibits a great disambiguation ability for samples of new tasks and achieves less forgetting of knowledge. Extensive experiments demonstrate that PGDR achieves superior

Communication has been widely employed to enhance multi-agent collaboration. Previous research has typically assumed delay-free communication, a strong assumption that is challenging to meet in practice. However, real-world agents suffer from channel delays, receiving messages sent at different time points, termed {\it{Asynchronous Communication}}, leading to cognitive biases and breakdowns in collaboration. This paper first defines two communication delay settings in MARL and emphasizes their harm to collaboration. To handle the above delays, this paper proposes a novel framework, Communication Delay-tolerant Multi-Agent Collaboration (CoDe). At first, CoDe learns an intent representation as messages through future action inference, reflecting the stable future behavioral trends of the agents. Then, CoDe devises a dual alignment mechanism of intent and timeliness to strengthen the fusion process of asynchronous messages. In this way, agents can extract the long-term intent of others, even from delayed messages, and selectively utilize the most recent messages that are relevant to their intent. Experimental results demonstrate that CoDe outperforms baseline algorithms in three MARL benchmarks without delay and exhibits robustness under fixed and time-varying delays.

Recent researchers have explored code generation Nowadays, LLMs have been successfully used to task by using LLMs; however, most studies (Li support developers' daily development, such as et al., 2023b, 2022a; Ahmad et al., 2021; Hu et al., code generation, test generation, etc. However, 2021) focus on generating "correct" code. There existing Code LLMs are usually general models is limited research investigating how to generate trained with large programming corpus (Zheng "personalized" code, especially for multi-user personalization, et al., 2023; Chen et al., 2022), therefore the generated with no research conducted yet. Automatically code is difficult to adapt to personalized and/or generating code according to developers' customized requests. Consider the following practical preferences or projects' consistency is a challenging scenarios: Alice is a software developer. To task: (i) Considering different programmers improve programmers' daily efficiency, her company have their own coding styles, it is too expensive provided the base LLMs that can be used for to fine-tune an LLM for each user (Guo et al., code generation.

We investigate bandit convex optimization (BCO) with delayed feedback, where only the loss value of the action is revealed under an arbitrary delay. Previous studies have established a regret bound of $O(T^{3/4}+d^{1/3}T^{2/3})$ for this problem, where $d$ is the maximum delay, by simply feeding delayed loss values to the classical bandit gradient descent (BGD) algorithm. In this paper, we develop a novel algorithm to enhance the regret, which carefully exploits the delayed bandit feedback via a blocking update mechanism. Our analysis first reveals that the proposed algorithm can decouple the joint effect of the delays and bandit feedback on the regret, and improve the regret bound to $O(T^{3/4}+\sqrt{dT})$ for convex functions. Compared with the previous result, our regret matches the $O(T^{3/4})$ regret of BGD in the non-delayed setting for a larger amount of delay, i.e., $d=O(\sqrt{T})$, instead of $d=O(T^{1/4})$. Furthermore, we consider the case with strongly convex functions, and prove that the proposed algorithm can enjoy a better regret bound of $O(T^{2/3}\log^{1/3}T+d\log T)$. Finally, we show that in a special case with unconstrained action sets, it can be simply extended to achieve a regret bound of $O(\sqrt{T\log T}+d\log T)$ for strongly convex and smooth functions.

We investigate the problem of online learning with monotone and continuous DR-submodular reward functions, which has received great attention recently. To efficiently handle this problem, especially in the case with complicated decision sets, previous studies have proposed an efficient projection-free algorithm called Mono-Frank-Wolfe (Mono-FW) using $O(T)$ gradient evaluations and linear optimization steps in total. However, it only attains a $(1-1/e)$-regret bound of $O(T^{4/5})$. In this paper, we propose an improved projection-free algorithm, namely POBGA, which reduces the regret bound to $O(T^{3/4})$ while keeping the same computational complexity as Mono-FW. Instead of modifying Mono-FW, our key idea is to make a novel combination of a projection-based algorithm called online boosting gradient ascent, an infeasible projection technique, and a blocking technique. Furthermore, we consider the decentralized setting and develop a variant of POBGA, which not only reduces the current best regret bound of efficient projection-free algorithms for this setting from $O(T^{4/5})$ to $O(T^{3/4})$, but also reduces the total communication complexity from $O(T)$ to $O(\sqrt{T})$.

Online convex optimization (OCO) with arbitrary delays, in which gradients or other information of functions could be arbitrarily delayed, has received increasing attention recently. Different from previous studies that focus on stationary environments, this paper investigates the delayed OCO in non-stationary environments, and aims to minimize the dynamic regret with respect to any sequence of comparators. To this end, we first propose a simple algorithm, namely DOGD, which performs a gradient descent step for each delayed gradient according to their arrival order. Despite its simplicity, our novel analysis shows that DOGD can attain an $O(\sqrt{dT}(P_T+1)$ dynamic regret bound in the worst case, where $d$ is the maximum delay, $T$ is the time horizon, and $P_T$ is the path length of comparators. More importantly, in case delays do not change the arrival order of gradients, it can automatically reduce the dynamic regret to $O(\sqrt{S}(1+P_T))$, where $S$ is the sum of delays. Furthermore, we develop an improved algorithm, which can reduce those dynamic regret bounds achieved by DOGD to $O(\sqrt{dT(P_T+1)})$ and $O(\sqrt{S(1+P_T)})$, respectively. The essential idea is to run multiple DOGD with different learning rates, and utilize a meta-algorithm to track the best one based on their delayed performance. Finally, we demonstrate that our improved algorithm is optimal in both cases by deriving a matching lower bound.