Xing, Dong
FP3O: Enabling Proximal Policy Optimization in Multi-Agent Cooperation with Parameter-Sharing Versatility
Feng, Lang, Xing, Dong, Zhang, Junru, Pan, Gang
Existing multi-agent PPO algorithms lack compatibility with different types of parameter sharing when extending the theoretical guarantee of PPO to cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL). In this paper, we propose a novel and versatile multi-agent PPO algorithm for cooperative MARL to overcome this limitation. Our approach is achieved upon the proposed full-pipeline paradigm, which establishes multiple parallel optimization pipelines by employing various equivalent decompositions of the advantage function. This procedure successfully formulates the interconnections among agents in a more general manner, i.e., the interconnections among pipelines, making it compatible with diverse types of parameter sharing. We provide a solid theoretical foundation for policy improvement and subsequently develop a practical algorithm called Full-Pipeline PPO (FP3O) by several approximations. Empirical evaluations on Multi-Agent MuJoCo and StarCraftII tasks demonstrate that FP3O outperforms other strong baselines and exhibits remarkable versatility across various parameter-sharing configurations.
Controlling Type Confounding in Ad Hoc Teamwork with Instance-wise Teammate Feedback Rectification
Xing, Dong, Gu, Pengjie, Zheng, Qian, Wang, Xinrun, Liu, Shanqi, Zheng, Longtao, An, Bo, Pan, Gang
Ad hoc teamwork requires an agent to cooperate with unknown teammates without prior coordination. Many works propose to abstract teammate instances into high-level representation of types and then pre-train the best response for each type. However, most of them do not consider the distribution of teammate instances within a type. This could expose the agent to the hidden risk of \emph{type confounding}. In the worst case, the best response for an abstract teammate type could be the worst response for all specific instances of that type. This work addresses the issue from the lens of causal inference. We first theoretically demonstrate that this phenomenon is due to the spurious correlation brought by uncontrolled teammate distribution. Then, we propose our solution, CTCAT, which disentangles such correlation through an instance-wise teammate feedback rectification. This operation reweights the interaction of teammate instances within a shared type to reduce the influence of type confounding. The effect of CTCAT is evaluated in multiple domains, including classic ad hoc teamwork tasks and real-world scenarios. Results show that CTCAT is robust to the influence of type confounding, a practical issue that directly hazards the robustness of our trained agents but was unnoticed in previous works.
Adaptive Value Decomposition with Greedy Marginal Contribution Computation for Cooperative Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning
Liu, Shanqi, Hu, Yujing, Wu, Runze, Xing, Dong, Xiong, Yu, Fan, Changjie, Kuang, Kun, Liu, Yong
Real-world cooperation often requires intensive coordination among agents simultaneously. This task has been extensively studied within the framework of cooperative multi-agent reinforcement learning (MARL), and value decomposition methods are among those cutting-edge solutions. However, traditional methods that learn the value function as a monotonic mixing of per-agent utilities cannot solve the tasks with non-monotonic returns. This hinders their application in generic scenarios. Recent methods tackle this problem from the perspective of implicit credit assignment by learning value functions with complete expressiveness or using additional structures to improve cooperation. However, they are either difficult to learn due to large joint action spaces or insufficient to capture the complicated interactions among agents which are essential to solving tasks with non-monotonic returns. To address these problems, we propose a novel explicit credit assignment method to address the non-monotonic problem. Our method, Adaptive Value decomposition with Greedy Marginal contribution (AVGM), is based on an adaptive value decomposition that learns the cooperative value of a group of dynamically changing agents. We first illustrate that the proposed value decomposition can consider the complicated interactions among agents and is feasible to learn in large-scale scenarios. Then, our method uses a greedy marginal contribution computed from the value decomposition as an individual credit to incentivize agents to learn the optimal cooperative policy. We further extend the module with an action encoder to guarantee the linear time complexity for computing the greedy marginal contribution. Experimental results demonstrate that our method achieves significant performance improvements in several non-monotonic domains.