We study the classic problem of prediction with expert advice under bandit feedback. Our model assumes that one action, corresponding to the learner's abstention from play, has no reward or loss on every trial. We propose the CBA algorithm, which exploits this assumption to obtain reward bounds that can significantly improve those of the classical Exp4 algorithm. We can view our problem as the aggregation of confidence-rated predictors when the learner has the option of abstention from play. Importantly, we are the first to achieve bounds on the expected cumulative reward for general confidence-rated predictors. In the special case of specialists we achieve a novel reward bound, significantly improving previous bounds of SpecialistExp (treating abstention as another action). As an example application, we discuss learning unions of balls in a finite metric space. In this contextual setting, we devise an efficient implementation of CBA, reducing the runtime from quadratic to almost linear in the number of contexts. Preliminary experiments show that CBA improves over existing bandit algorithms.

We investigate the problem of online collaborative filtering under no-repetition constraints, whereby users need to be served content in an online fashion and a given user cannot be recommended the same content item more than once. We start by designing and analyzing an algorithm that works under biclustering assumptions on the user-item preference matrix, and show that this algorithm exhibits an optimal regret guarantee, while being fully adaptive, in that it is oblivious to any prior knowledge about the sequence of users, the universe of items, as well as the biclustering parameters of the preference matrix. We then propose a more robust version of this algorithm which operates with general matrices. Also this algorithm is parameter free, and we prove regret guarantees that scale with the amount by which the preference matrix deviates from a biclustered structure. To our knowledge, these are the first results on online collaborative filtering that hold at this level of generality and adaptivity under no-repetition constraints. Finally, we complement our theoretical findings with simple experiments on real-world datasets aimed at both validating the theory and empirically comparing to standard baselines. This comparison shows the competitive advantage of our approach over these baselines.

Because of their relevance in practical applications, contextual bandits are a fundamental model of sequential decision-making with partial feedback. In particular, linear contextual bandits [Abe and Long, 1999, Auer, 2002], in which contexts are feature vectors and the loss is a linear function of the context, are among the most studied variants of contextual bandits. Traditionally, contextual bandits (and, in particular, their linear variant) have been investigated under stochastic assumptions on the generation of rewards. Namely, the loss of each action is a fixed and unknown linear function of the context to which some zero-mean noise is added. For this setting, efficient and nearly optimal algorithms, like OFUL [Abbasi-Yadkori et al., 2011] and a contextual variant of Thompson Sampling [Agrawal and Goyal, 2013], have been proposed in the past. Recently, Neu and Olkhovskaya [2020] introduced an adversarial variant of linear contextual bandits, where there are K arms and the linear loss associated with each arm is adversarially chosen in each round. They prove an upper bound on the regret of order dKT disregarding logarithmic factors, where d is the dimensionality of contexts and T is the time horizon. A matching lower bound Ω ( dKT) for this model is implied by the results of Zierahn et al. [2023]. The upper bound has been recently extended by Olkhovskaya et al. [2023], who show first and second-order regret bounds respectively of the order of K dL

Many online decision-making problems correspond to maximizing a sequence of submodular functions. In this work, we introduce sum-max functions, a subclass of monotone submodular functions capturing several interesting problems, including best-of-$K$-bandits, combinatorial bandits, and the bandit versions on facility location, $M$-medians, and hitting sets. We show that all functions in this class satisfy a key property that we call pseudo-concavity. This allows us to prove $\big(1 - \frac{1}{e}\big)$-regret bounds for bandit feedback in the nonstochastic setting of the order of $\sqrt{MKT}$ (ignoring log factors), where $T$ is the time horizon and $M$ is a cardinality constraint. This bound, attained by a simple and efficient algorithm, significantly improves on the $\widetilde{O}\big(T^{2/3}\big)$ regret bound for online monotone submodular maximization with bandit feedback.

We present a new effective and scalable framework for training GNNs in supervised node classification tasks, given graph-structured data. Our approach increasingly refines the weight update operations on a sequence of path graphs obtained by linearizing random spanning trees extracted from the input network. The path graphs are designed to retain essential topological and node information of the original graph. At the same time, the sparsity of these path graphs enables a much lighter GNN training which, besides scalability, helps mitigate classical training issues, like over-squashing and over-smoothing. We carry out an extensive experimental investigation on a number of real-world graph benchmarks, where we apply our framework to graph convolutional networks, showing simultaneous improvement of both training speed and test accuracy, as compared to well-known baselines.

In this paper we consider an online learning version of the Facility location problem where users need to be served one at a time in a sequence of trials. The goal is to select, at each trial, a subset of a given set of sites, and then pay a loss equal to their total "opening cost" plus the minimum "connection cost" for connecting the user to one of the sites in the subset. More precisely, we are given a set of N sites. At the beginning of each trial, an opening cost and a connection cost for the arriving user are associated with each site and are unknown. At each trial, the learner has to select a subset of sites and incurs a loss given by the minimum connection cost over the selected sites plus the sum of the opening costs of all selected sites. After each subset selection, the opening and connection costs of all sites are revealed. To solve this problem, we design and rigorously analyse an algorithm which belongs to the class of online learning algorithms that make use of the Exponentiated gradient method [15]. We measure, and rigorously analyse, the performance of our method by comparing its cumulative loss with that of any fixed subset of sites.

We introduce a new online learning framework where, at each trial, the learner is required to select a subset of actions from a given known action set. Each action is associated with an energy value, a reward and a cost. The sum of the energies of the actions selected cannot exceed a given energy budget. The goal is to maximise the cumulative profit, where the profit obtained on a single trial is defined as the difference between the maximum reward among the selected actions and the sum of their costs. Action energy values and the budget are known and fixed. All rewards and costs associated with each action change over time and are revealed at each trial only after the learner's selection of actions. Our framework encompasses several online learning problems where the environment changes over time; and the solution trades-off between minimising the costs and maximising the maximum reward of the selected subset of actions, while being constrained to an action energy budget. The algorithm that we propose is efficient and general in that it may be specialised to multiple natural online combinatorial problems.

We investigate active learning by pairwise similarity over the leaves of trees originating from hierarchical clustering procedures. In the realizable setting, we provide a full characterization of the number of queries needed to achieve perfect reconstruction of the tree cut. In the non-realizable setting, we rely on known important-sampling procedures to obtain regret and query complexity bounds. Our algorithms come with theoretical guarantees on the statistical error and, more importantly, lend themselves to linear-time implementations in the relevant parameters of the problem. We discuss such implementations, prove running time guarantees for them, and present preliminary experiments on real-world datasets showing the compelling practical performance of our algorithms as compared to both passive learning and simple active learning baselines.

We investigate learning algorithms that use similarity queries to approximately solve correlation clustering problems. The input consists of $n$ objects; each pair of objects has a hidden binary similarity score that we can learn through a query. The goal is to use as few queries as possible to partition the objects into clusters so to achieve the optimal number OPT of disagreements with the scores. Our first set of contributions is algorithmic: we introduce ACC, a simple query-aware variant of an existing algorithm (KwikCluster, with expected error 3OPT but a vacuous $\mathcal{O}(n^2)$ worst-case bound on the number of queries) for which we prove several desirable properties. First, ACC has expected error 3OPT$ + \mathcal{O}(n^3/Q)$ when using $Q < \binom{n}{2}$ queries, and recovers KwikCluster's bound of 3OPT for $Q=\binom{n}{2}$. Second, ACC accurately recovers every adversarially perturbed latent cluster $C$. Under stronger conditions on $C$, ACC can even be used to recover exactly all clusters with high probability. Third, we show an efficient variant, \aggress, with the same expected error as ACC but using significantly less queries on some graphs. We empirically test our algorithms on real-world and synthetic datasets. Our second set of contributions is a nearly complete information-theoretic characterization of the query vs.\ error trade-off. First, using VC theory, for all $Q = \Omega(n)$ we prove the existence of algorithms with expected error at most OPT$+ n^{5/2}/\sqrt{Q}$, and at most $\widetilde{\mathcal{O}}\big(n^3/Q\big)$ if OPT=0. We then show that any randomized algorithm, when using at most $Q$ queries, must output a clustering with expected cost OPT$+ \Omega\big(n^3/Q\big)$, which matches the upper bound for $Q=\Theta(n)$. For the special case of OPT=0 we prove a weaker lower bound of $\Omega\big(n^2/\sqrt{Q}\big)$.

A reciprocal recommendation problem is one where the goal of learning is not just to predict a user's preference towards a passive item (e.g., a book), but to recommend the targeted user on one side another user from the other side such that a mutual interest between the two exists. The problem thus is sharply different from the more traditional items-to-users recommendation, since a good match requires meeting the preferences of both users. We initiate a rigorous theoretical investigation of the reciprocal recommendation task in a specific framework of sequential learning. We point out general limitations, formulate reasonable assumptions enabling effective learning and, under these assumptions, we design and analyze a computationally efficient algorithm that uncovers mutual likes at a pace comparable to those achieved by a clairvoyant algorithm knowing all user preferences in advance. Finally, we validate our algorithm against synthetic and real-world datasets, showing improved empirical performance over simple baselines.