Understanding convergent learning -- the extent to which artificial and biological neural networks develop similar representations -- is crucial for neuroscience and AI, as it reveals shared learning principles and guides brain-like model design. While several studies have noted convergence in early and late layers of vision networks, key gaps remain. First, much existing work relies on a limited set of metrics, overlooking transformation invariances required for proper alignment. We compare three metrics that ignore specific irrelevant transformations: linear regression (ignoring affine transformations), Procrustes (ignoring rotations and reflections), and permutation/soft-matching (ignoring unit order). Notably, orthogonal transformations align representations nearly as effectively as more flexible linear ones, and although permutation scores are lower, they significantly exceed chance, indicating a robust representational basis. A second critical gap lies in understanding when alignment emerges during training. Contrary to expectations that convergence builds gradually with task-specific learning, our findings reveal that nearly all convergence occurs within the first epoch -- long before networks achieve optimal performance. This suggests that shared input statistics, architectural biases, or early training dynamics drive convergence rather than the final task solution. Finally, prior studies have not systematically examined how changes in input statistics affect alignment. Our work shows that out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs consistently amplify differences in later layers, while early layers remain aligned for both in-distribution and OOD inputs, suggesting that this alignment is driven by generalizable features stable across distribution shifts. These findings fill critical gaps in our understanding of representational convergence, with implications for neuroscience and AI.

Neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI) both face the challenge of interpreting high-dimensional neural data, where the comparative analysis of such data is crucial for revealing shared mechanisms and differences between these complex systems. Despite the widespread use of representational comparisons and the abundance classes of comparison methods, a critical question remains: which metrics are most suitable for these comparisons? While some studies evaluate metrics based on their ability to differentiate models of different origins or constructions (e.g., various architectures), another approach is to assess how well they distinguish models that exhibit distinct behaviors. To investigate this, we examine the degree of alignment between various representational similarity measures and behavioral outcomes, employing group statistics and a comprehensive suite of behavioral metrics for comparison. In our evaluation of eight commonly used representational similarity metrics in the visual domain--spanning alignment-based, Canonical Correlation Analysis (CCA)-based, inner product kernel-based, and nearest-neighbor methods--we found that metrics like linear Centered Kernel Alignment (CKA) and Procrustes distance, which emphasize the overall geometric structure or shape of representations, excelled in differentiating trained from untrained models and aligning with behavioral measures, whereas metrics such as linear predictivity, commonly used in neuroscience, demonstrated only moderate alignment with behavior. These insights are crucial for selecting metrics that emphasize behaviorally meaningful comparisons in NeuroAI research. Both neuroscience and artificial intelligence (AI) confront the challenge of high-dimensional neural data, whether from neurobiological firing rates, voxel responses, or hidden layer activations in artificial networks. Comparing such high-dimensional neural data is critical for both fields, as it facilitates understanding of complex systems by revealing their underlying similarities and differences.

Cross-lingual dubbing of lecture videos requires the transcription of the original audio, correction and removal of disfluencies, domain term discovery, text-to-text translation into the target language, chunking of text using target language rhythm, text-to-speech synthesis followed by isochronous lipsyncing to the original video. This task becomes challenging when the source and target languages belong to different language families, resulting in differences in generated audio duration. This is further compounded by the original speaker's rhythm, especially for extempore speech. This paper describes the challenges in regenerating English lecture videos in Indian languages semi-automatically. A prototype is developed for dubbing lectures into 9 Indian languages. A mean-opinion-score (MOS) is obtained for two languages, Hindi and Tamil, on two different courses. The output video is compared with the original video in terms of MOS (1-5) and lip synchronisation with scores of 4.09 and 3.74, respectively. The human effort also reduces by 75%.