One of the current challenges to understanding neural information processing in biological systems is to decipher the "code" carried by large populations of neurons acting in parallel. We present an algorithm for automated discovery of stochastic firing patterns in large ensembles of neurons. The algorithm, from the "Helmholtz Machine" family, attempts to predict the observed spike patterns in the data. The model consists of an observable layer which is directly activated by the input spike patterns, and hidden units that are activated throughascending connections from the input layer. The hidden unit activity can be propagated down to the observable layer to create a prediction of the data pattern that produced it.

One of the current challenges to understanding neural information processing in biological systems is to decipher the "code" carried by large populations of neurons acting in parallel. We present an algorithm for automated discovery of stochastic firing patterns in large ensembles of neurons. The algorithm, from the "Helmholtz Machine" family, attempts to predict the observed spike patterns in the data. The model consists of an observable layer which is directly activated by the input spike patterns, and hidden units that are activated through ascending connections from the input layer. The hidden unit activity can be propagated down to the observable layer to create a prediction of the data pattern that produced it.

In supervised learning there is usually a clear distinction between inputs and outputs - inputs are what you will measure, outputs are what you will predict from those measurements. This paper shows that the distinction between inputs and outputs is not this Some features are more useful as extra outputs than assimple. By using a feature as an output we get more than just the case values but can. For many features this mapping may be more useful than the feature value itself. We present two regression problems and one classification problem where performance improves if features that could have been used as inputs are used as extra outputs instead.

In supervised learning there is usually a clear distinction between inputs and outputs - inputs are what you will measure, outputs are what you will predict from those measurements. This paper shows that the distinction between inputs and outputs is not this simple. Some features are more useful as extra outputs than as inputs. By using a feature as an output we get more than just the case values but can. For many features this mapping may be more useful than the feature value itself.

We represent objects with n-dimensional pattern vectors and consider piecewise-linear classifiers consisting of a collection of (labeled) codebook vectors in the space of the input patterns (See Figure 1). The classification boundaries are gi ven by the voronoi tessellation of the codebook vectors. Patterns are said to belong to the class (given by the label) of the codebook vector to which they are closest.

Department of Computer Science University of Rochester Rochester, NY 14627 Abstract One of the advantages of supervised learning is that the final error metric isavailable during training. For classifiers, the algorithm can directly reduce the number of misclassifications on the training set. Unfortunately, whenmodeling human learning or constructing classifiers for autonomous robots,supervisory labels are often not available or too expensive. In this paper we show that we can substitute for the labels by making use of structure between the pattern distributions to different sensory modalities.We show that minimizing the disagreement between the outputs of networks processing patterns from these different modalities is a sensible approximation to minimizing the number of misclassifications in each modality, and leads to similar results. Using the Peterson-Barney vowel dataset we show that the algorithm performs well in finding appropriate placementfor the codebook vectors particularly when the confuseable classes are different for the two modalities. 1 INTRODUCTION This paper addresses the question of how a human or autonomous robot can learn to classify new objects without experience with previous labeled examples.

Vector Quantization is useful for data compression. Competitive Learning which minimizes reconstruction error is an appropriate algorithm for vector quantization of unlabelled data. Vector quantization of labelled data for classification has a different objective, to minimize the number of misclassifications, and a different algorithm is appropriate. We show that a variant of Kohonen's LVQ2.1 algorithm can be seen as a multiclass extension of an algorithm which in a restricted 2 class case can be proven to converge to the Bayes optimal classification boundary. We compare the performance of the LVQ2.1 algorithm to that of a modified version having a decreasing window and normalized step size, on a ten class vowel classification problem.

Vector Quantization is useful for data compression. Competitive Learning whichminimizes reconstruction error is an appropriate algorithm for vector quantization of unlabelled data. Vector quantization of labelled data for classification has a different objective, to minimize the number of misclassifications, and a different algorithm is appropriate. We show that a variant of Kohonen's LVQ2.1 algorithm can be seen as a multiclass extensionof an algorithm which in a restricted 2 class case can be proven to converge to the Bayes optimal classification boundary. We compare the performance of the LVQ2.1 algorithm to that of a modified version having a decreasing window and normalized step size, on a ten class vowel classification problem.

Vector Quantization is useful for data compression. Competitive Learning which minimizes reconstruction error is an appropriate algorithm for vector quantization of unlabelled data. Vector quantization of labelled data for classification has a different objective, to minimize the number of misclassifications, and a different algorithm is appropriate. We show that a variant of Kohonen's LVQ2.1 algorithm can be seen as a multiclass extension of an algorithm which in a restricted 2 class case can be proven to converge to the Bayes optimal classification boundary. We compare the performance of the LVQ2.1 algorithm to that of a modified version having a decreasing window and normalized step size, on a ten class vowel classification problem.