Dialog state tracking is difficult because automatic speech recognition (ASR) and spoken language understanding (SLU) errors are common and can cause the system to misunderstand the user. At the same time, state tracking is crucial because the system relies on the estimated dialog state to choose actions -- for example, which restaurants to suggest. Figure 1 shows an illustration of the dialog state tracking task. Historically dialog state tracking has been done with handcrafted rules. More recently, statistical methods have been found to be superior by effectively overcoming some SLU errors, resulting in better dialogs. Despite this progress, direct comparisons between methods have not been possible because past studies use different domains, system components, and evaluation measures, hindering progresss.

Deciding what mix of engine and battery power to use is critical to hybrid vehicles' fuel efficiency. Current solutions consider several factors such as the charge of the battery and how efficient the engine operates at a given speed. Previous research has shown that by taking into account the future power requirements of the vehicle, a more efficient balance of engine vs. battery power can be attained. In this paper, we utilize a probabilistic driving route prediction system, trained using Inverse Reinforcement Learning, to optimize the hybrid control policy. Our approach considers routes that the driver is likely to be taking, computing an optimal mix of engine and battery power. This approach has the potential to increase vehicle power efficiency while not requiring any hardware modification or change in driver behavior. Our method outperforms a standard hybrid control policy, yielding an average of 1.22% fuel savings.

This special issue of AI Magazine on dialog with robots brings together a collection of articles on situated dialog. The contributing authors have been working in interrelated fields of human-robot interaction, dialog systems, virtual agents, and other related areas and address core concepts in spoken dialog with embodied robots or agents. Several of the contributors participated in the AAAI Fall Symposium on Dialog with Robots, held in November 2010, and several articles in this issue are extensions of work presented there. The articles in this collection address diverse aspects of dialog with robots, but are unified in addressing opportunities with spoken language interaction, physical embodiment, and enriched representations of context.

In parallel with these efforts, significant advances have also been made in robotics. Innovations in sensing, reasoning, and manipulation have allowed autonomous robots to move beyond the walls of computing labs into the workplace, home, and street. Bringing robots into real-world environments has made it clear to researchers that robots need not only accurately navigate and manipulate objects, but also to work alongside and, ultimately, interact and collaborate with humans. Subsequently, efforts at the intersection of spoken dialogue and human-robot interaction (HRI) have sought to broaden studies of spoken dialogue to richer, more natural, physically situated settings, and have brought to the fore the rich research area of situated dialogue, focused on challenges and opportunities at the intersection of natural language, robotics, and commonsense reasoning. Projects in this realm have addressed challenges with the use of dialogue as enabling coordination among multiple actors, taking into consideration not only the details of the task at hand, but also the dynamic physical and social context in which the actors are immersed and the affordances that embodiment provides. This special issue of AI Magazine on dialogue with robots brings together a collection of articles on situated dialogue.

The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence was pleased to present the 2010 Fall Symposium Series, held Thursday through Saturday, November 11-13, at the Westin Arlington Gateway in Arlington, Virginia. The titles of the eight symposia are as follows: (1) Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems; (2) Commonsense Knowledge; (3) Complex Adaptive Systems: Resilience, Robustness, and Evolvability; (4) Computational Models of Narrative; (5) Dialog with Robots; (6) Manifold Learning and Its Applications; (7) Proactive Assistant Agents; and (8) Quantum Informatics for Cognitive, Social, and Semantic Processes. The highlights of each symposium are presented in this report.

The Association for the Advancement of Artificial Intelligence was pleased to present the 2010 Fall Symposium Series, held Thursday through Saturday, November 11-13, at the Westin Arlington Gateway in Arlington, Virginia. The titles of the eight symposia are as follows: (1) Cognitive and Metacognitive Educational Systems; (2) Commonsense Knowledge; (3) Complex Adaptive Systems: Resilience, Robustness, and Evolvability; (4) Computational Models of Narrative; (5) Dialog with Robots; (6) Manifold Learning and Its Applications; (7) Proactive Assistant Agents ; and (8) Quantum Informatics for Cognitive, Social, and Semantic Processes. The highlights of each symposium are presented in this report.

Researchers in the human-robot interaction (HRI) community mechanisms and devices that are fundamental to have addressed a spectrum of challenges at the intersection create, maintain, and organize interactions in physical space of robotics, cognitive science, human factors, and artificial such as engagement, turn-taking, joint attention, and verbal intelligence. Several others investigate developmental such as telephone-and PCbased information access. These projects have identified numerous interesting in the interaction with the physical world. Yet others focus challenges with the use of dialog as part of coordination on various interaction design challenges, describe existing among multiple actors, taking into consideration details of or planned systems, research platforms, and toolkits, report the tasks at hand and the surrounding environment. And the list goes on.

Cochairs and Program Committee for the AAAI 2010 Symposium on Dialog with Robots.

Researchers can use simulators Figure 1: The Siros client/server architecture of the Konbini to collect data to build and evaluate interaction models at system. the same time as core components of the real-world robot are built and integrated. Once the real robot becomes robust enough, the models trained on simulators can be applied for Clients are in charge of rendering a given view of the virtual further experiments.