Alignment tuning is crucial for ensuring large language models (LLMs) behave ethically and helpfully. Current alignment approaches require high-quality annotations and significant training resources. This paper proposes a low-cost, tuning-free method using in-context learning (ICL) to enhance LLM alignment. Through an analysis of high-quality ICL demos, we identified style as a key factor influencing LLM alignment capabilities and explicitly restyled ICL exemplars based on this stylistic framework. Additionally, we combined the restyled demos to achieve a balance between the two conflicting aspects of LLM alignment--factuality and safety. We packaged the restyled examples as prompts to trigger few-shot learning, improving LLM alignment. Compared to the best baseline approach, with an average score of 5.00 as the maximum, our method achieves a maximum 0.10 increase on the Alpaca task (from 4.50 to 4.60), a 0.22 enhancement on the Just-eval benchmark (from 4.34 to 4.56), and a maximum improvement of 0.32 (from 3.53 to 3.85) on the MT-Bench dataset. We release the code and data at https://github.com/AnonymousCode-ComputerScience/RIDE.

Identifying cause-and-effect relationships is critical to understanding real-world dynamics and ultimately causal reasoning. Existing methods for identifying event causality in NLP, including those based on Large Language Models (LLMs), exhibit difficulties in out-of-distribution settings due to the limited scale and heavy reliance on lexical cues within available benchmarks. Modern benchmarks, inspired by probabilistic causal inference, have attempted to construct causal graphs of events as a robust representation of causal knowledge, where \texttt{CRAB} \citep{romanou2023crab} is one such recent benchmark along this line. In this paper, we introduce \texttt{ACCESS}, a benchmark designed for discovery and reasoning over abstract causal events. Unlike existing resources, \texttt{ACCESS} focuses on causality of everyday life events on the abstraction level. We propose a pipeline for identifying abstractions for event generalizations from \texttt{GLUCOSE} \citep{mostafazadeh-etal-2020-glucose}, a large-scale dataset of implicit commonsense causal knowledge, from which we subsequently extract $1,4$K causal pairs. Our experiments highlight the ongoing challenges of using statistical methods and/or LLMs for automatic abstraction identification and causal discovery in NLP. Nonetheless, we demonstrate that the abstract causal knowledge provided in \texttt{ACCESS} can be leveraged for enhancing QA reasoning performance in LLMs.

Teacher-forcing training for audio captioning usually leads to exposure bias due to training and inference mismatch. Prior works propose the contrastive method to deal with caption degeneration. However, the contrastive method ignores the temporal information when measuring similarity across acoustic and linguistic modalities, leading to inferior performance. In this work, we develop the temporal-similarity score by introducing the unbiased sliced Wasserstein RBF (USW-RBF) kernel equipped with rotary positional embedding to account for temporal information across modalities. In contrast to the conventional sliced Wasserstein RBF kernel, we can form an unbiased estimation of USW-RBF kernel via Monte Carlo estimation. Therefore, it is well-suited to stochastic gradient optimization algorithms, and its approximation error decreases at a parametric rate of $\mathcal{O}(L^{-1/2})$ with $L$ Monte Carlo samples. Additionally, we introduce an audio captioning framework based on the unbiased sliced Wasserstein kernel, incorporating stochastic decoding methods to mitigate caption degeneration during the generation process. We conduct extensive quantitative and qualitative experiments on two datasets, AudioCaps and Clotho, to illustrate the capability of generating high-quality audio captions. Experimental results show that our framework is able to increase caption length, lexical diversity, and text-to-audio self-retrieval accuracy.

Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have demonstrated the ability to interact with humans under real-world conditions by combining Large Language Models (LLMs) and modality encoders to align multimodal information (visual and auditory) with text. However, such models raise new safety challenges of whether models that are safety-aligned on text also exhibit consistent safeguards for multimodal inputs. Despite recent safety-alignment research on vision LMMs, the safety of audio LMMs remains under-explored. In this work, we comprehensively red team the safety of five advanced audio LMMs under three settings: (i) harmful questions in both audio and text formats, (ii) harmful questions in text format accompanied by distracting non-speech audio, and (iii) speech-specific jailbreaks. Our results under these settings demonstrate that open-source audio LMMs suffer an average attack success rate of 69.14% on harmful audio questions, and exhibit safety vulnerabilities when distracted with non-speech audio noise. Our speech-specific jailbreaks on Gemini-1.5-Pro achieve an attack success rate of 70.67% on the harmful query benchmark. We provide insights on what could cause these reported safety-misalignments. Warning: this paper contains offensive examples.

The performance of large language models (LLMs) in natural language processing (NLP) tasks is significantly influenced by the quality and diversity of data used for supervised fine-tuning (SFT). Current data selection methods often focus solely on quality or diversity, leading to underperforming models due to suboptimal training data. In this paper, we introduce GraphFilter, a novel method that represents the dataset as a bipartite graph, linking sentences to their constituent n-grams. This representation effectively captures the relationships between sentences and linguistic patterns, facilitating the selection of sentences that enhance n-gram diversity. To balance quality and diversity during selection, we propose a priority function that combines the quality metric with the diversity metric in a multiplicative manner. GraphFilter iteratively selects high-priority sentences, updates the bipartite graph by removing covered n-grams, and re-calculates priorities to reflect the evolving data landscape. We conduct extensive experiments using three model backbones across six widely used benchmarks. The results demonstrate that GraphFilter outperforms all nine baseline approaches, achieving superior model performance and computational efficiency. Our analyses validate the effectiveness of our design choices, examine the subsets selected by GraphFilter and other methods, highlight the importance of instruction diversity, and explore the role of quality and diversity in relation to subset sizes. GraphFilter establishes a new foundation for effective data selection strategies, encouraging further research in data selection for LLMs.

Large language models (LLMs) have exhibited outstanding performance in engaging with humans and addressing complex questions by leveraging their vast implicit knowledge and robust reasoning capabilities. However, such models are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks, leading to the generation of harmful responses. Despite recent research on single-turn jailbreak strategies to facilitate the development of defence mechanisms, the challenge of revealing vulnerabilities under multi-turn setting remains relatively under-explored. In this work, we propose Jigsaw Puzzles (JSP), a straightforward yet effective multi-turn jailbreak strategy against the advanced LLMs. JSP splits questions into harmless fractions as the input of each turn, and requests LLMs to reconstruct and respond to questions under multi-turn interaction. Our experimental results demonstrate that the proposed JSP jailbreak bypasses original safeguards against explicitly harmful content, achieving an average attack success rate of 93.76% on 189 harmful queries across 5 advanced LLMs (Gemini-1.5-Pro, Llama-3.1-70B, GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini). Moreover, JSP achieves a state-of-the-art attack success rate of 92% on GPT-4 on the harmful query benchmark, and exhibits strong resistant to defence strategies. Warning: this paper contains offensive examples.

Sociocultural norms serve as guiding principles for personal conduct in social interactions, emphasizing respect, cooperation, and appropriate behavior, which is able to benefit tasks including conversational information retrieval, contextual information retrieval and retrieval-enhanced machine learning. We propose a scalable approach for constructing a Sociocultural Norm (SCN) Base using Large Language Models (LLMs) for socially aware dialogues. We construct a comprehensive and publicly accessible Chinese Sociocultural NormBase. Our approach utilizes socially aware dialogues, enriched with contextual frames, as the primary data source to constrain the generating process and reduce the hallucinations. This enables extracting of high-quality and nuanced natural-language norm statements, leveraging the pragmatic implications of utterances with respect to the situation. As real dialogue annotated with gold frames are not readily available, we propose using synthetic data. Our empirical results show: (i) the quality of the SCNs derived from synthetic data is comparable to that from real dialogues annotated with gold frames, and (ii) the quality of the SCNs extracted from real data, annotated with either silver (predicted) or gold frames, surpasses that without the frame annotations. We further show the effectiveness of the extracted SCNs in a RAG-based (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) model to reason about multiple downstream dialogue tasks.

Currently, prompting techniques can be mainly divided into two categories:1)shot method implicitly inspires the model to answer the question by mimicing the steps in the given example, e.g., the few-shot CoT. 2) Guideline method explicitly instructs the model to reason by following guidelines, which contains succinct and concise task-specific knowledge. Shot method is prone to difficulties in terms of selection of shots type, the number of shots, and the design of the reasoning steps, so a question arises: can we only use guideline instead of shot in the prompt? To this end, we propose the FGT framework to automatically learn task-specific guidelines from dataset consisting of Feedback, Guideline, and Tree-gather agents. First, the feedback agent is designed to evaluate the outcomes, both right and wrong, of each Q&A to gather insights guiding more effective optimization strategies. Next, the guideline agent is tasked with deriving guidelines from each piece of feedback and storing them in local memory. Lastly, the tree-gather agent aggregates all guidelines hierarchically through a tree structure, ultimately obtaining all unduplicated guidelines from a global perspective. In addition, we induce the model to generate intermediate processes to ensure the reasoning consistent with the guidelines. Experimental results demonstrate that our approach achieves superior performance across multiple tasks, thereby highlighting the effectiveness of using the guidelines in prompt.

Recent studies have shown that maintaining a consistent response style by human experts and enhancing data quality in training sets can significantly improve the performance of fine-tuned Large Language Models (LLMs) while reducing the number of training examples needed. However, the precise definition of style and the relationship between style, data quality, and LLM performance remains unclear. This research decomposes response style into presentation and composition styles and finds that, among training data of similar quality, those with higher style consistency lead to better LLM performance. Inspired by this, we introduce Style Consistency-Aware Response Ranking (SCAR), which automatically prioritizes instruction-response pairs in the training set based on their response stylistic consistency. By selecting the most style-consistent examples, ranging from the top 25% to 0.7% of the full dataset, the fine-tuned LLMs can match or even surpass the performance of models trained on the entire dataset in coding and open-ended question-answering benchmarks. Code and data are available at https://github.com/zhuang-li/SCAR .

Instruction tuning has been identified as a crucial technique for optimizing the performance of large language models (LLMs) in generating human-aligned responses. Nonetheless, gathering diversified and superior-quality instruction data for such tuning presents notable obstacles, especially in domains with rigid privacy provisions. Federated instruction tuning (FedIT) has emerged as a promising solution, by consolidating collaborative training across multiple data owners, thereby resulting in a privacy-preserving learning model. However, FedIT encounters limitations such as scarcity of instructional data and risk of exposure to training data extraction attacks. In this paper, we propose a novel federated algorithm, FewFedPIT, designed to simultaneously enhance privacy protection and model performance of federated few-shot learning. FewFedPITcomprises three vital components on the client side: (1) synthetic data generation, which utilizes LLMs' in-context learning capacity to generate synthetic data autonomously, thus expanding the local database; (2) parameter isolation training, which individually updates the public parameters in the synthetic data and the private parameters in the local data, consequently mitigating the noise impact of the synthetic data; (3) local aggregation sharing, which mixes public and private parameters before uploading, effectively preventing data extraction attacks. Extensive experiments on three open-source datasets demonstrate the effectiveness of FewFedPITin, enhancing privacy preservation and improving federated few-shot performance.