Unraveling the co-expression of genes across studies enhances the understanding of cellular processes. Inferring gene co-expression networks from transcriptome data presents many challenges, including spurious gene correlations, sample correlations, and batch effects. To address these complexities, we introduce a robust method for high-dimensional graph inference from multiple independent studies. We base our approach on the premise that each dataset is essentially a noisy linear mixture of gene loadings that follow a multivariate $t$-distribution with a sparse precision matrix, which is shared across studies. This allows us to show that we can identify the co-expression matrix up to a scaling factor among other model parameters. Our method employs an Expectation-Maximization procedure for parameter estimation. Empirical evaluation on synthetic and gene expression data demonstrates our method's improved ability to learn the underlying graph structure compared to baseline methods.

We propose a general framework for constructing powerful, sequential hypothesis tests for a large class of nonparametric testing problems. The null hypothesis for these problems is defined in an abstract form using the action of two known operators on the data distribution. This abstraction allows for a unified treatment of several classical tasks, such as two-sample testing, independence testing, and conditional-independence testing, as well as modern problems, such as testing for adversarial robustness of machine learning (ML) models. Our proposed framework has the following advantages over classical batch tests: 1) it continuously monitors online data streams and efficiently aggregates evidence against the null, 2) it provides tight control over the type I error without the need for multiple testing correction, 3) it adapts the sample size requirement to the unknown hardness of the problem. We develop a principled approach of leveraging the representation capability of ML models within the testing-by-betting framework, a game-theoretic approach for designing sequential tests. Empirical results on synthetic and real-world datasets demonstrate that tests instantiated using our general framework are competitive against specialized baselines on several tasks.

Independent component analysis (ICA) is a blind source separation method for linear disentanglement of independent latent sources from observed data. We investigate the special setting of noisy linear ICA where the observations are split among different views, each receiving a mixture of shared and individual sources. We prove that the corresponding linear structure is identifiable, and the source distribution can be recovered. To computationally estimate the sources, we optimize a constrained form of the joint log-likelihood of the observed data among all views. We also show empirically that our objective recovers the sources also in the case when the measurements are corrupted by noise. Furthermore, we propose a model selection procedure for recovering the number of shared sources which we verify empirically. Finally, we apply the proposed model in a challenging real-life application, where the estimated shared sources from two large transcriptome datasets (observed data) provided by two different labs (two different views) lead to recovering (shared) sources utilized for finding a plausible representation of the underlying graph structure.