We study stochastic approximation procedures for approximately solving a $d$-dimensional linear fixed point equation based on observing a trajectory of length $n$ from an ergodic Markov chain. We first exhibit a non-asymptotic bound of the order $t_{\mathrm{mix}} \tfrac{d}{n}$ on the squared error of the last iterate of a standard scheme, where $t_{\mathrm{mix}}$ is a mixing time. We then prove a non-asymptotic instance-dependent bound on a suitably averaged sequence of iterates, with a leading term that matches the local asymptotic minimax limit, including sharp dependence on the parameters $(d, t_{\mathrm{mix}})$ in the higher order terms. We complement these upper bounds with a non-asymptotic minimax lower bound that establishes the instance-optimality of the averaged SA estimator. We derive corollaries of these results for policy evaluation with Markov noise -- covering the TD($\lambda$) family of algorithms for all $\lambda \in [0, 1)$ -- and linear autoregressive models. Our instance-dependent characterizations open the door to the design of fine-grained model selection procedures for hyperparameter tuning (e.g., choosing the value of $\lambda$ when running the TD($\lambda$) algorithm).

We consider a general class of regression models with normally distributed covariates, and the associated nonconvex problem of fitting these models from data. We develop a general recipe for analyzing the convergence of iterative algorithms for this task from a random initialization. In particular, provided each iteration can be written as the solution to a convex optimization problem satisfying some natural conditions, we leverage Gaussian comparison theorems to derive a deterministic sequence that provides sharp upper and lower bounds on the error of the algorithm with sample-splitting. Crucially, this deterministic sequence accurately captures both the convergence rate of the algorithm and the eventual error floor in the finite-sample regime, and is distinct from the commonly used "population" sequence that results from taking the infinite-sample limit. We apply our general framework to derive several concrete consequences for parameter estimation in popular statistical models including phase retrieval and mixtures of regressions. Provided the sample size scales near-linearly in the dimension, we show sharp global convergence rates for both higher-order algorithms based on alternating updates and first-order algorithms based on subgradient descent. These corollaries, in turn, yield multiple consequences, including: (a) Proof that higher-order algorithms can converge significantly faster than their first-order counterparts (and sometimes super-linearly), even if the two share the same population update and (b) Intricacies in super-linear convergence behavior for higher-order algorithms, which can be nonstandard (e.g., with exponent 3/2) and sensitive to the noise level in the problem. We complement these results with extensive numerical experiments, which show excellent agreement with our theoretical predictions.

We introduce the "inverse bandit" problem of estimating the rewards of a multi-armed bandit instance from observing the learning process of a low-regret demonstrator. Existing approaches to the related problem of inverse reinforcement learning assume the execution of an optimal policy, and thereby suffer from an identifiability issue. In contrast, our paradigm leverages the demonstrator's behavior en route to optimality, and in particular, the exploration phase, to obtain consistent reward estimates. We develop simple and efficient reward estimation procedures for demonstrations within a class of upper-confidence-based algorithms, showing that reward estimation gets progressively easier as the regret of the algorithm increases. We match these upper bounds with information-theoretic lower bounds that apply to any demonstrator algorithm, thereby characterizing the optimal tradeoff between exploration and reward estimation. Extensive empirical evaluations on both synthetic data and simulated experimental design data from the natural sciences corroborate our theoretical results.

The literature on ranking from ordinal data is vast, and there are several ways to aggregate overall preferences from pairwise comparisons between objects. In particular, it is well known that any Nash equilibrium of the zero sum game induced by the preference matrix defines a natural solution concept (winning distribution over objects) known as a von Neumann winner. Many real-world problems, however, are inevitably multi-criteria, with different pairwise preferences governing the different criteria. In this work, we generalize the notion of a von Neumann winner to the multi-criteria setting by taking inspiration from Blackwell's approachability. Our framework allows for non-linear aggregation of preferences across criteria, and generalizes the linearization-based approach from multi-objective optimization. From a theoretical standpoint, we show that the Blackwell winner of a multi-criteria problem instance can be computed as the solution to a convex optimization problem. Furthermore, given random samples of pairwise comparisons, we show that a simple plug-in estimator achieves near-optimal minimax sample complexity. Finally, we showcase the practical utility of our framework in a user study on autonomous driving, where we find that the Blackwell winner outperforms the von Neumann winner for the overall preferences.

Linear fixed point equations in Hilbert spaces arise in a variety of settings, including reinforcement learning, and computational methods for solving differential and integral equations. We study methods that use a collection of random observations to compute approximate solutions by searching over a known low-dimensional subspace of the Hilbert space. First, we prove an instance-dependent upper bound on the mean-squared error for a linear stochastic approximation scheme that exploits Polyak--Ruppert averaging. This bound consists of two terms: an approximation error term with an instance-dependent approximation factor, and a statistical error term that captures the instance-specific complexity of the noise when projected onto the low-dimensional subspace. Using information theoretic methods, we also establish lower bounds showing that both of these terms cannot be improved, again in an instance-dependent sense. A concrete consequence of our characterization is that the optimal approximation factor in this problem can be much larger than a universal constant. We show how our results precisely characterize the error of a class of temporal difference learning methods for the policy evaluation problem with linear function approximation, establishing their optimality.

Motivated by models for multiway comparison data, we consider the problem of estimating a coordinate-wise isotonic function on the domain $[0, 1]^d$ from noisy observations collected on a uniform lattice, but where the design points have been permuted along each dimension. While the univariate and bivariate versions of this problem have received significant attention, our focus is on the multivariate case $d \geq 3$. We study both the minimax risk of estimation (in empirical $L_2$ loss) and the fundamental limits of adaptation (quantified by the adaptivity index) to a family of piecewise constant functions. We provide a computationally efficient Mirsky partition estimator that is minimax optimal while also achieving the smallest adaptivity index possible for polynomial time procedures. Thus, from a worst-case perspective and in sharp contrast to the bivariate case, the latent permutations in the model do not introduce significant computational difficulties over and above vanilla isotonic regression. On the other hand, the fundamental limits of adaptation are significantly different with and without unknown permutations: Assuming a hardness conjecture from average-case complexity theory, a statistical-computational gap manifests in the former case. In a complementary direction, we show that natural modifications of existing estimators fail to satisfy at least one of the desiderata of optimal worst-case statistical performance, computational efficiency, and fast adaptation. Along the way to showing our results, we improve adaptation results in the special case $d = 2$ and establish some properties of estimators for vanilla isotonic regression, both of which may be of independent interest.

A variety of applications spanning science and engineering use Markov reward processes as models for real-world phenomena, including queueing systems, transportation networks, robotic exploration, game playing, and epidemiology. In some of these settings, the underlying parameters that govern the process are known to the modeller, but in others, these must be estimated from observed data. A salient example of the latter setting, which forms the main motivation for this paper, is the policy evaluation problem encountered in Markov decision processes (MDPs) and reinforcement learning [Ber95a; Ber95b; SB18]. Here an agent operates in an environment whose dynamics are unknown: at each step, it observes the current state of the environment, and takes an action that changes its state according to some stochastic transition function determined by the environment. The goal is to evaluate the utility of some policy--that is, a mapping from states to actions, where utility is measured using rewards that the agent receives from the environment. These rewards are usually assumed to be additive over time, and since the policy determines the action to be taken at each state, the reward obtained at any time is simply a function of the current state of the agent. Thus, this setting induces a Markov reward process (MRP) on the state space, in which both the underlying transitions and rewards are unknown to the agent. The agent only observes samples of state transitions and rewards. 1

Max-affine regression refers to a model where the unknown regression function is modeled as a maximum of $k$ unknown affine functions for a fixed $k \geq 1$. This generalizes linear regression and (real) phase retrieval, and is closely related to convex regression. Working within a non-asymptotic framework, we study this problem in the high-dimensional setting assuming that $k$ is a fixed constant, and focus on estimation of the unknown coefficients of the affine functions underlying the model. We analyze a natural alternating minimization (AM) algorithm for the non-convex least squares objective when the design is random. We show that the AM algorithm, when initialized suitably, converges with high probability and at a geometric rate to a small ball around the optimal coefficients. In order to initialize the algorithm, we propose and analyze a combination of a spectral method and a random search scheme in a low-dimensional space, which may be of independent interest. The final rate that we obtain is near-parametric and minimax optimal (up to a poly-logarithmic factor) as a function of the dimension, sample size, and noise variance. In that sense, our approach should be viewed as a direct and implementable method of enforcing regularization to alleviate the curse of dimensionality in problems of the convex regression type. As a by-product of our analysis, we also obtain guarantees on a classical algorithm for the phase retrieval problem under considerably weaker assumptions on the design distribution than was previously known. Numerical experiments illustrate the sharpness of our bounds in the various problem parameters.

We study derivative-free methods for policy optimization over the class of linear policies. We focus on characterizing the convergence rate of these methods when applied to linear-quadratic systems, and study various settings of driving noise and reward feedback. We show that these methods provably converge to within any pre-specified tolerance of the optimal policy with a number of zero-order evaluations that is an explicit polynomial of the error tolerance, dimension, and curvature properties of the problem. Our analysis reveals some interesting differences between the settings of additive driving noise and random initialization, as well as the settings of one-point and two-point reward feedback. Our theory is corroborated by extensive simulations of derivative-free methods on these systems. Along the way, we derive convergence rates for stochastic zero-order optimization algorithms when applied to a certain class of non-convex problems.

Many applications, including rank aggregation, crowd-labeling, and graphon estimation, can be modeled in terms of a bivariate isotonic matrix with unknown permutations acting on its rows and columns. We consider the problem of estimating such a matrix based on noisy observations of a subset of its entries, and design and analyze polynomial-time algorithms that improve upon the state of the art. In particular, our results imply that any such $n \times n$ matrix can be estimated efficiently in the normalized, squared Frobenius norm at rate $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(n^{-3/4})$, thus narrowing the gap between $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(n^{-1})$ and $\widetilde{\mathcal O}(n^{-1/2})$, hitherto the rates of the most statistically and computationally efficient methods, respectively. Additionally, our algorithms are minimax optimal in another natural metric that measures how well an estimate captures each row of the matrix. Along the way, we prove matching upper and lower bounds on the minimax radii of certain cone testing problems, which may be of independent interest.