This study presents an uncertainty-aware stacked neural networks model for the reliable classification of COVID-19 from radiological images. The model addresses the critical gap in uncertainty-aware modeling by focusing on accurately identifying confidently correct predictions while alerting users to confidently incorrect and uncertain predictions, which can promote trust in automated systems. The architecture integrates uncertainty quantification methods, including Monte Carlo dropout and ensemble techniques, to enhance predictive reliability by assessing the certainty of diagnostic predictions. Within a two-tier model framework, the tier one model generates initial predictions and associated uncertainties, which the second tier model uses to produce a trust indicator alongside the diagnostic outcome. This dual-output model not only predicts COVID-19 cases but also provides a trust flag, indicating the reliability of each diagnosis and aiming to minimize the need for retesting and expert verification. The effectiveness of this approach is demonstrated through extensive experiments on the COVIDx CXR-4 dataset, showing a novel approach in identifying and handling confidently incorrect cases and uncertain cases, thus enhancing the trustworthiness of automated diagnostics in clinical settings.

In machine learning, the exponential growth of data and the associated ``curse of dimensionality'' pose significant challenges, particularly with expansive yet sparse datasets. Addressing these challenges, multi-view ensemble learning (MEL) has emerged as a transformative approach, with feature partitioning (FP) playing a pivotal role in constructing artificial views for MEL. Our study introduces the Semantic-Preserving Feature Partitioning (SPFP) algorithm, a novel method grounded in information theory. The SPFP algorithm effectively partitions datasets into multiple semantically consistent views, enhancing the MEL process. Through extensive experiments on eight real-world datasets, ranging from high-dimensional with limited instances to low-dimensional with high instances, our method demonstrates notable efficacy. It maintains model accuracy while significantly improving uncertainty measures in scenarios where high generalization performance is achievable. Conversely, it retains uncertainty metrics while enhancing accuracy where high generalization accuracy is less attainable. An effect size analysis further reveals that the SPFP algorithm outperforms benchmark models by large effect size and reduces computational demands through effective dimensionality reduction. The substantial effect sizes observed in most experiments underscore the algorithm's significant improvements in model performance.

With the surge in data generation, both vertically (i.e., volume of data) and horizontally (i.e., dimensionality), the burden of the curse of dimensionality has become increasingly palpable. Feature selection, a key facet of dimensionality reduction techniques, has advanced considerably to address this challenge. One such advancement is the Boruta feature selection algorithm, which successfully discerns meaningful features by contrasting them to their permutated counterparts known as shadow features. However, the significance of a feature is shaped more by the data's overall traits than by its intrinsic value, a sentiment echoed in the conventional Boruta algorithm where shadow features closely mimic the characteristics of the original ones. Building on this premise, this paper introduces an innovative approach to the Boruta feature selection algorithm by incorporating noise into the shadow variables. Drawing parallels from the perturbation analysis framework of artificial neural networks, this evolved version of the Boruta method is presented. Rigorous testing on four publicly available benchmark datasets revealed that this proposed technique outperforms the classic Boruta algorithm, underscoring its potential for enhanced, accurate feature selection.

Humans possess the extraordinary capability of learning a new concept even after minimal observation. To a greater extent, a child can distinguish a dog from a cat through a single picture [1]. This critical characteristic of human intelligence lies in the humans' ability to leverage obtained knowledge of prior experiences to unforeseen circumstances with small observation. Unlike the human learning paradigm, traditional machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models train a specific task from scratch through: (a) the training phase in which a model is initiated randomly and then updated, and (b) the test phase in which the model evaluates. While ML and DL have obtained remarkable success in a wide range of applications, they are notorious for requiring a huge number of samples to generalize. In many real-world problems, collecting more data is costly, time-consuming, and even might not feasible due to physical system constraints [2]. Moreover, most ML and DL models presume that training and testing datasets have the same distribution [3]. Thus, their performance suffers under data distribution shifts [4].

Countless research works of deep neural networks (DNNs) in the task of credit card fraud detection have focused on improving the accuracy of point predictions and mitigating unwanted biases by building different network architectures or learning models. Quantifying uncertainty accompanied by point estimation is essential because it mitigates model unfairness and permits practitioners to develop trustworthy systems which abstain from suboptimal decisions due to low confidence. Explicitly, assessing uncertainties associated with DNNs predictions is critical in real-world card fraud detection settings for characteristic reasons, including (a) fraudsters constantly change their strategies, and accordingly, DNNs encounter observations that are not generated by the same process as the training distribution, (b) owing to the time-consuming process, very few transactions are timely checked by professional experts to update DNNs. Therefore, this study proposes three uncertainty quantification (UQ) techniques named Monte Carlo dropout, ensemble, and ensemble Monte Carlo dropout for card fraud detection applied on transaction data. Moreover, to evaluate the predictive uncertainty estimates, UQ confusion matrix and several performance metrics are utilized. Through experimental results, we show that the ensemble is more effective in capturing uncertainty corresponding to generated predictions. Additionally, we demonstrate that the proposed UQ methods provide extra insight to the point predictions, leading to elevate the fraud prevention process.