Radio source localization can benefit many fields, including wireless communications, radar, radio astronomy, wireless sensor networks, positioning systems, and surveillance systems. However, accurately estimating the position of a radio transmitter using a remote sensor is not an easy task, as many factors contribute to the highly dynamic behavior of radio signals. In this study, we investigate techniques to use a mobile robot to explore an outdoor area and localize the radio source using sparse Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI) measurements. We propose a novel radio source localization method with fast turnaround times and reduced complexity compared to the state-of-the-art. Our technique uses RSSI measurements collected while the robot completed a sparse trajectory using a coverage path planning map. The mean RSSI within each grid cell was used to find the most likely cell containing the source. Three techniques were analyzed with the data from eight field tests using a mobile robot. The proposed method can localize a gas source in a basketball field with a 1.2 m accuracy and within three minutes of convergence time, whereas the state-of-the-art active sensing technique took more than 30 minutes to reach a source estimation accuracy below 1 m.

Adversarial Machine Learning (AML) represents the ability to disrupt Machine Learning (ML) algorithms through a range of methods that broadly exploit the architecture of deep learning optimisation. This paper presents Distributed Adversarial Regions (DAR), a novel method that implements distributed instantiations of computer vision-based AML attack methods that may be used to disguise objects from image recognition in both white and black box settings. We consider the context of object detection models used in urban environments, and benchmark the MobileNetV2, NasNetMobile and DenseNet169 models against a subset of relevant images from the ImageNet dataset. We evaluate optimal parameters (size, number and perturbation method), and compare to state-of-the-art AML techniques that perturb the entire image. We find that DARs can cause a reduction in confidence of 40.4% on average, but with the benefit of not requiring the entire image, or the focal object, to be perturbed. The DAR method is a deliberately simple approach where the intention is to highlight how an adversary with very little skill could attack models that may already be productionised, and to emphasise the fragility of foundational object detection models. We present this as a contribution to the field of ML security as well as AML. This paper contributes a novel adversarial method, an original comparison between DARs and other AML methods, and frames it in a new context - that of urban camouflage and the necessity for ML security and model robustness.

The guidance of a large swarm is a challenging control problem. Shepherding offers one approach to guide a large swarm using a few shepherding agents (sheepdogs). Noise is an inherent characteristic in many real-world problems. However, the impact of noise on shepherding is not well-studied. This impact could take two forms. First, noise in the sensorial information received by the shepherd about the location of sheep. Second, noise in the ability of the sheepdog to influence sheep due to disturbances caused during actuation. We study both types of noise in this paper. In this paper, we investigate the performance of Str\"{o}mbom\textquoteright s approach under actuation and perception noises. Before studying the effect noise, we needed to ensure that the parameterisation of the algorithm corresponds to a stable performance for the algorithm. This pegged for running a large number of simulations, while increasing the number of random episodes until stability is achieved. We then systematically studies the impact of sensorial and actuation noise on performance. Str\"{o}mbom\textquoteright s approach is found to be more sensitive to actuation noise than perception noise. This implies that it is more important for the shepherding agent to influence the sheep more accurately by reducing actuation noise than attempting to reduce noise in its sensors. Moreover, different levels of noise required different parameterisation for the shepherding agent, where the threshold needed by an agent to decide whether or not to collect astray sheep is different for different noise levels.