Successful deployment of mobile robots in unstructured domains requires an understanding of the environment and terrain to avoid hazardous areas, getting stuck, and colliding with obstacles. Traversability estimation--which predicts where in the environment a robot can travel--is one prominent approach that tackles this problem. Existing geometric methods may ignore important semantic considerations, while semantic segmentation approaches involve a tedious labeling process. Recent self-supervised methods reduce labeling tedium, but require additional data or models and tend to struggle to explicitly label untraversable areas. To address these limitations, we introduce a weakly-supervised method for relative traversability estimation. Our method involves manually annotating the relative traversability of a small number of point pairs, which significantly reduces labeling effort compared to traditional segmentation-based methods and avoids the limitations of self-supervised methods. We further improve the performance of our method through a novel cross-image labeling strategy and loss function. We demonstrate the viability and performance of our method through deployment on a mobile robot in outdoor environments.

Uncovering potential failure cases is a crucial step in the validation of safety critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. Failure search may be done through logging substantial vehicle miles in either simulation or real world testing. Due to the sparsity of failure events, naive random search approaches require significant amounts of vehicle operation hours to find potential system weaknesses. As a result, adaptive searching techniques have been proposed to efficiently explore and uncover failure trajectories of an autonomous policy in simulation. Adaptive Stress Testing (AST) is one such method that poses the problem of failure search as a Markov decision process and uses reinforcement learning techniques to find high probability failures. However, this formulation requires a probability model for the actions of all agents in the environment. In systems where the environment actions are discrete and dependencies among agents exist, it may be infeasible to fully characterize the distribution or find a suitable proxy. This work proposes the use of a data driven approach to learn a suitable classifier that tries to model how humans identify {critical states and use this to guide failure search in AST. We show that the incorporation of critical states into the AST framework generates failure scenarios with increased safety violations in an autonomous driving policy with a discrete action space.

As advances in artificial intelligence enable increasingly capable learning-based autonomous agents, it becomes more challenging for human observers to efficiently construct a mental model of the agent's behaviour. In order to successfully deploy autonomous agents, humans should not only be able to understand the individual limitations of the agents but also have insight on how they compare against one another. To do so, we need effective methods for generating human interpretable agent behaviour summaries. Single agent behaviour summarization has been tackled in the past through methods that generate explanations for why an agent chose to pick a particular action at a single timestep. However, for complex tasks, a per-action explanation may not be able to convey an agents global strategy. As a result, researchers have looked towards multi-timestep summaries which can better help humans assess an agents overall capability. More recently, multi-step summaries have also been used for generating contrasting examples to evaluate multiple agents. However, past approaches have largely relied on unstructured search methods to generate summaries and require agents to have a discrete action space. In this paper we present an adaptive search method for efficiently generating contrasting behaviour summaries with support for continuous state and action spaces. We perform a user study to evaluate the effectiveness of the summaries for helping humans discern the superior autonomous agent for a given task. Our results indicate that adaptive search can efficiently identify informative contrasting scenarios that enable humans to accurately select the better performing agent with a limited observation time budget.

The behavior of self driving cars may differ from people expectations, (e.g. an autopilot may unexpectedly relinquish control). This expectation mismatch can cause potential and existing users to distrust self driving technology and can increase the likelihood of accidents. We propose a simple but effective framework, AutoPreview, to enable consumers to preview a target autopilot potential actions in the real world driving context before deployment. For a given target autopilot, we design a delegate policy that replicates the target autopilot behavior with explainable action representations, which can then be queried online for comparison and to build an accurate mental model. To demonstrate its practicality, we present a prototype of AutoPreview integrated with the CARLA simulator along with two potential use cases of the framework. We conduct a pilot study to investigate whether or not AutoPreview provides deeper understanding about autopilot behavior when experiencing a new autopilot policy for the first time. Our results suggest that the AutoPreview method helps users understand autopilot behavior in terms of driving style comprehension, deployment preference, and exact action timing prediction.

Determining possible failure scenarios is a critical step in the evaluation of autonomous vehicle systems. Real-world vehicle testing is commonly employed for autonomous vehicle validation, but the costs and time requirements are high. Consequently, simulation-driven methods such as Adaptive Stress Testing (AST) have been proposed to aid in validation. AST formulates the problem of finding the most likely failure scenarios as a Markov decision process, which can be solved using reinforcement learning. In practice, AST tends to find scenarios where failure is unavoidable and tends to repeatedly discover the same types of failures of a system. This work addresses these issues by encoding domain relevant information into the search procedure. With this modification, the AST method discovers a larger and more expressive subset of the failure space when compared to the original AST formulation. We show that our approach is able to identify useful failure scenarios of an autonomous vehicle policy.