Deploying large language models (LLMs) in edge-cloud environments requires an efficient routing strategy to balance cost and response quality. Traditional approaches prioritize either human-preference data or accuracy metrics from benchmark datasets as routing criteria, but these methods suffer from rigidity and subjectivity. Moreover, existing routing frameworks primarily focus on accuracy and cost, neglecting response quality from a human preference perspective. In this work, we propose the Confidence-Driven LLM Router, a novel framework that leverages uncertainty estimation to optimize routing decisions. To comprehensively assess routing performance, we evaluate both system cost efficiency and response quality. In particular, we introduce the novel use of LLM-as-a-Judge to simulate human rating preferences, providing the first systematic assessment of response quality across different routing strategies. Extensive experiments on MT-Bench, GSM8K, and MMLU demonstrate that our approach outperforms state-of-the-art routing methods, achieving superior response quality while maintaining cost efficiency.

In this work, we introduce the Learnable Response Scoring Function (LARS) for Uncertainty Estimation (UE) in generative Large Language Models (LLMs). Current scoring functions for probability-based UE, such as length-normalized scoring and semantic contribution-based weighting, are designed to solve specific aspects of the problem but exhibit limitations, including the inability to handle biased probabilities and under-performance in low-resource languages like Turkish. To address these issues, we propose LARS, a scoring function that leverages supervised data to capture complex dependencies between tokens and probabilities, thereby producing more reliable and calibrated response scores in computing the uncertainty of generations. Our extensive experiments across multiple datasets show that LARS substantially outperforms existing scoring functions considering various probability-based UE methods.

Recent advances in foundation models have enabled audio-generative models that produce high-fidelity sounds associated with music, events, and human actions. Despite the success achieved in modern audio-generative models, the conventional approach to assessing the quality of the audio generation relies heavily on distance metrics like Frechet Audio Distance. In contrast, we aim to evaluate the quality of audio generation by examining the effectiveness of using them as training data. Specifically, we conduct studies to explore the use of synthetic audio for audio recognition. Moreover, we investigate whether synthetic audio can serve as a resource for data augmentation in speech-related modeling. Our comprehensive experiments demonstrate the potential of using synthetic audio for audio recognition and speech-related modeling. Our code is available at https://github.com/usc-sail/SynthAudio.

Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) are widely utilized for their excellence in various tasks. However, their tendency to produce inaccurate or misleading outputs poses a potential risk, particularly in high-stakes environments. Therefore, estimating the correctness of generative LLM outputs is an important task for enhanced reliability. Uncertainty Estimation (UE) in generative LLMs is an evolving domain, where SOTA probability-based methods commonly employ length-normalized scoring. In this work, we propose Meaning-Aware Response Scoring (MARS) as an alternative to length-normalized scoring for UE methods. MARS is a novel scoring function that considers the semantic contribution of each token in the generated sequence in the context of the question. We demonstrate that integrating MARS into UE methods results in a universal and significant improvement in UE performance. We conduct experiments using three distinct closed-book question-answering datasets across five popular pre-trained LLMs. Lastly, we validate the efficacy of MARS on a Medical QA dataset. Code can be found https://github.com/Ybakman/LLM_Uncertainity.

In real-world machine learning systems, labels are often derived from user behaviors that the system wishes to encourage. Over time, new models must be trained as new training examples and features become available. However, feedback loops between users and models can bias future user behavior, inducing a presentation bias in the labels that compromises the ability to train new models. In this paper, we propose counterfactual augmentation, a novel causal method for correcting presentation bias using generated counterfactual labels. Our empirical evaluations demonstrate that counterfactual augmentation yields better downstream performance compared to both uncorrected models and existing bias-correction methods. Model analyses further indicate that the generated counterfactuals align closely with true counterfactuals in an oracle setting.

One of the goals in Federated Learning (FL) is to create personalized models that can adapt to the context of each participating client, while utilizing knowledge from a shared global model. Yet, often, personalization requires a fine-tuning step using clients' labeled data in order to achieve good performance. This may not be feasible in scenarios where incoming clients are fresh and/or have privacy concerns. It, then, remains open how one can achieve just-in-time personalization in these scenarios. We propose FedJETs, a novel solution by using a Mixture-of-Experts (MoE) framework within a FL setup. Our method leverages the diversity of the clients to train specialized experts on different subsets of classes, and a gating function to route the input to the most relevant expert(s). Our gating function harnesses the knowledge of a pretrained model common expert to enhance its routing decisions on-the-fly. As a highlight, our approach can improve accuracy up to 18\% in state of the art FL settings, while maintaining competitive zero-shot performance. In practice, our method can handle non-homogeneous data distributions, scale more efficiently, and improve the state-of-the-art performance on common FL benchmarks.

In this work, we propose GPT-FL, a generative pre-trained model-assisted federated learning (FL) framework. At its core, GPT-FL leverages generative pretrained models to generate diversified synthetic data. These generated data are used to train a downstream model on the server, which is then fine-tuned with private client data under the standard FL framework. We show that GPT-FL consistently outperforms state-of-the-art FL methods in terms of model test accuracy, communication efficiency, and client sampling efficiency. Through comprehensive ablation analysis, we discover that the downstream model generated by synthetic data plays a crucial role in controlling the direction of gradient diversity during FL training, which enhances convergence speed and contributes to the notable accuracy boost observed with GPT-FL. Also, regardless of whether the target data falls within or outside the domain of the pre-trained generative model, GPT-FL consistently achieves significant performance gains, surpassing the results obtained by models trained solely with FL or synthetic data. Federated learning (FL) is a privacy-preserving machine learning paradigm that allows a collection of clients to collaboratively train a machine learning model without sharing their private data Zhang et al. (2021). Most existing FL studies such as McMahan et al. (2016); Bonawitz et al. (2019) follow the standard FL architecture, where each participating client trains a local model using its own private data and a central server aggregates these locally trained models to update a global model and send it back to the clients for the next round of training. However, although many efforts have been made Sahu et al. (2018); Karimireddy et al. (2019); Reddi et al. (2020), the performance of standard FL is still constrained by client drift caused by the heterogeneity in private data distribution across the clients. To enhance the performance of FL, recent studies propose to incorporate data collected from public spaces such as the internet into the FL process Lin et al. (2020); Li et al. (2021); Itahara et al. (2020); Cho et al. (2022). However, the performance of such public data-based approaches is heavily dependent on the quality of the collected public data. Unfortunately, obtaining the desired public data can be extremely challenging in practice and there is a lack of principled guidance on how to obtain them. To address the issues of public data-based approaches, FL methods based on synthetic data emerge Zhang et al. (2022); Zhu et al. (2021); Pi et al. (2022).

Federated learning is gaining popularity as it enables training high-utility models across several clients without directly sharing their private data. As a downside, the federated setting makes the model vulnerable to various adversarial attacks in the presence of malicious clients. Despite the theoretical and empirical success in defending against attacks that aim to degrade models' utility, defense against backdoor attacks that increase model accuracy on backdoor samples exclusively without hurting the utility on other samples remains challenging. To this end, we first analyze the vulnerability of federated learning to backdoor attacks over a flat loss landscape which is common for well-designed neural networks such as Resnet [He et al., 2015] but is often overlooked by previous works. Over a flat loss landscape, misleading federated learning models to exclusively benefit malicious clients with backdoor samples do not require a significant difference between malicious and benign client-wise updates, making existing defenses insufficient. In contrast, we propose an invariant aggregator that redirects the aggregated update to invariant directions that are generally useful via selectively masking out the gradient elements that favor few and possibly malicious clients regardless of the difference magnitude. Theoretical results suggest that our approach provably mitigates backdoor attacks over both flat and sharp loss landscapes. Empirical results on three datasets with different modalities and varying numbers of clients further demonstrate that our approach mitigates a broad class of backdoor attacks with a negligible cost on the model utility.

Many existing FL methods assume clients with fully-labeled data, while in realistic settings, clients have limited labels due to the expensive and laborious process of labeling. Limited labeled local data of the clients often leads to their local model having poor generalization abilities to their larger unlabeled local data, such as having class-distribution mismatch with the unlabeled data. As a result, clients may instead look to benefit from the global model trained across clients to leverage their unlabeled data, but this also becomes difficult due to data heterogeneity across clients. In our work, we propose FedLabel where clients selectively choose the local or global model to pseudo-label their unlabeled data depending on which is more of an expert of the data. We further utilize both the local and global models' knowledge via global-local consistency regularization which minimizes the divergence between the two models' outputs when they have identical pseudo-labels for the unlabeled data. Unlike other semi-supervised FL baselines, our method does not require additional experts other than the local or global model, nor require additional parameters to be communicated. We also do not assume any server-labeled data or fully labeled clients. For both cross-device and cross-silo settings, we show that FedLabel outperforms other semi-supervised FL baselines by $8$-$24\%$, and even outperforms standard fully supervised FL baselines ($100\%$ labeled data) with only $5$-$20\%$ of labeled data.

In this paper we introduce "Federated Learning Utilities and Tools for Experimentation" (FLUTE), a high-performance open-source platform for federated learning research and offline simulations. The goal of FLUTE is to enable rapid prototyping and simulation of new federated learning algorithms at scale, including novel optimization, privacy, and communications strategies. We describe the architecture of FLUTE, enabling arbitrary federated modeling schemes to be realized. We compare the platform with other state-of-the-art platforms and describe available features of FLUTE for experimentation in core areas of active research, such as optimization, privacy, and scalability. A comparison with other established platforms shows speed-ups of up to 42x and savings in memory footprint of 3x. A sample of the platform capabilities is also presented for a range of tasks, as well as other functionality, such as linear scaling for the number of participating clients, and a variety of federated optimizers, including FedAdam, DGA, etcetera.