Burgess-Limerick, Ben
Open X-Embodiment: Robotic Learning Datasets and RT-X Models
Collaboration, Open X-Embodiment, Padalkar, Abhishek, Pooley, Acorn, Mandlekar, Ajay, Jain, Ajinkya, Tung, Albert, Bewley, Alex, Herzog, Alex, Irpan, Alex, Khazatsky, Alexander, Rai, Anant, Singh, Anikait, Garg, Animesh, Brohan, Anthony, Raffin, Antonin, Wahid, Ayzaan, Burgess-Limerick, Ben, Kim, Beomjoon, Schölkopf, Bernhard, Ichter, Brian, Lu, Cewu, Xu, Charles, Finn, Chelsea, Xu, Chenfeng, Chi, Cheng, Huang, Chenguang, Chan, Christine, Pan, Chuer, Fu, Chuyuan, Devin, Coline, Driess, Danny, Pathak, Deepak, Shah, Dhruv, Büchler, Dieter, Kalashnikov, Dmitry, Sadigh, Dorsa, Johns, Edward, Ceola, Federico, Xia, Fei, Stulp, Freek, Zhou, Gaoyue, Sukhatme, Gaurav S., Salhotra, Gautam, Yan, Ge, Schiavi, Giulio, Kahn, Gregory, Su, Hao, Fang, Hao-Shu, Shi, Haochen, Amor, Heni Ben, Christensen, Henrik I, Furuta, Hiroki, Walke, Homer, Fang, Hongjie, Mordatch, Igor, Radosavovic, Ilija, Leal, Isabel, Liang, Jacky, Abou-Chakra, Jad, Kim, Jaehyung, Peters, Jan, Schneider, Jan, Hsu, Jasmine, Bohg, Jeannette, Bingham, Jeffrey, Wu, Jiajun, Wu, Jialin, Luo, Jianlan, Gu, Jiayuan, Tan, Jie, Oh, Jihoon, Malik, Jitendra, Booher, Jonathan, Tompson, Jonathan, Yang, Jonathan, Lim, Joseph J., Silvério, João, Han, Junhyek, Rao, Kanishka, Pertsch, Karl, Hausman, Karol, Go, Keegan, Gopalakrishnan, Keerthana, Goldberg, Ken, Byrne, Kendra, Oslund, Kenneth, Kawaharazuka, Kento, Zhang, Kevin, Rana, Krishan, Srinivasan, Krishnan, Chen, Lawrence Yunliang, Pinto, Lerrel, Fei-Fei, Li, Tan, Liam, Ott, Lionel, Lee, Lisa, Tomizuka, Masayoshi, Spero, Max, Du, Maximilian, Ahn, Michael, Zhang, Mingtong, Ding, Mingyu, Srirama, Mohan Kumar, Sharma, Mohit, Kim, Moo Jin, Kanazawa, Naoaki, Hansen, Nicklas, Heess, Nicolas, Joshi, Nikhil J, Suenderhauf, Niko, Di Palo, Norman, Shafiullah, Nur Muhammad Mahi, Mees, Oier, Kroemer, Oliver, Sanketi, Pannag R, Wohlhart, Paul, Xu, Peng, Sermanet, Pierre, Sundaresan, Priya, Vuong, Quan, Rafailov, Rafael, Tian, Ran, Doshi, Ria, Martín-Martín, Roberto, Mendonca, Russell, Shah, Rutav, Hoque, Ryan, Julian, Ryan, Bustamante, Samuel, Kirmani, Sean, Levine, Sergey, Moore, Sherry, Bahl, Shikhar, Dass, Shivin, Sonawani, Shubham, Song, Shuran, Xu, Sichun, Haldar, Siddhant, Adebola, Simeon, Guist, Simon, Nasiriany, Soroush, Schaal, Stefan, Welker, Stefan, Tian, Stephen, Dasari, Sudeep, Belkhale, Suneel, Osa, Takayuki, Harada, Tatsuya, Matsushima, Tatsuya, Xiao, Ted, Yu, Tianhe, Ding, Tianli, Davchev, Todor, Zhao, Tony Z., Armstrong, Travis, Darrell, Trevor, Jain, Vidhi, Vanhoucke, Vincent, Zhan, Wei, Zhou, Wenxuan, Burgard, Wolfram, Chen, Xi, Wang, Xiaolong, Zhu, Xinghao, Li, Xuanlin, Lu, Yao, Chebotar, Yevgen, Zhou, Yifan, Zhu, Yifeng, Xu, Ying, Wang, Yixuan, Bisk, Yonatan, Cho, Yoonyoung, Lee, Youngwoon, Cui, Yuchen, Wu, Yueh-Hua, Tang, Yujin, Zhu, Yuke, Li, Yunzhu, Iwasawa, Yusuke, Matsuo, Yutaka, Xu, Zhuo, Cui, Zichen Jeff
Large, high-capacity models trained on diverse datasets have shown remarkable successes on efficiently tackling downstream applications. In domains from NLP to Computer Vision, this has led to a consolidation of pretrained models, with general pretrained backbones serving as a starting point for many applications. Can such a consolidation happen in robotics? Conventionally, robotic learning methods train a separate model for every application, every robot, and even every environment. Can we instead train generalist X-robot policy that can be adapted efficiently to new robots, tasks, and environments? In this paper, we provide datasets in standardized data formats and models to make it possible to explore this possibility in the context of robotic manipulation, alongside experimental results that provide an example of effective X-robot policies. We assemble a dataset from 22 different robots collected through a collaboration between 21 institutions, demonstrating 527 skills (160266 tasks). We show that a high-capacity model trained on this data, which we call RT-X, exhibits positive transfer and improves the capabilities of multiple robots by leveraging experience from other platforms. More details can be found on the project website $\href{https://robotics-transformer-x.github.io}{\text{robotics-transformer-x.github.io}}$.
Reactive Base Control for On-The-Move Mobile Manipulation in Dynamic Environments
Burgess-Limerick, Ben, Haviland, Jesse, Lehnert, Chris, Corke, Peter
Abstract-- We present a reactive base control method that enables high performance mobile manipulation on-the-move in environments with static and dynamic obstacles. Performing manipulation tasks while the mobile base remains in motion can significantly decrease the time required to perform multistep tasks, as well as improve the gracefulness of the robot's motion. Existing approaches to manipulation on-the-move either ignore the obstacle avoidance problem or rely on the execution of planned trajectories, which is not suitable in environments with dynamic objects and obstacles. The presented controller addresses both of these deficiencies and demonstrates robust performance of pick-and-place tasks in dynamic environments. The performance is evaluated on several (a) Real-world manipulation on-the-move with dynamic obstacles. On a real-world task with static obstacles, we outperform an existing method by 48% in terms of total task time.
Enabling Failure Recovery for On-The-Move Mobile Manipulation
Burgess-Limerick, Ben, Leitner, Chris Lehnert Jurgen, Corke, Peter
We present a robot base placement and control method that enables a mobile manipulator to gracefully recover from manipulation failures while performing tasks on-the-move. A mobile manipulator in motion has a limited window to complete a task, unlike when stationary where it can make repeated attempts until successful. Existing approaches to manipulation on-the-move are typically based on open-loop execution of planned trajectories which does not allow the base controller to react to manipulation failures, slowing down or stopping as required. To overcome this limitation, we present a reactive base control method that repeatedly evaluates the best base placement given the robot's current state, the immediate manipulation task, as well as the next part of a multi-step task. The result is a system that retains the reliability of traditional mobile manipulation approaches where the base comes to a stop, but leverages the performance gains available by performing manipulation on-the-move. The controller keeps the base in range of the target for as long as required to recover from manipulation failures while making as much progress as possible toward the next objective. See https://benburgesslimerick.github.io/MotM-FailureRecovery for videos of experiments.
An Architecture for Reactive Mobile Manipulation On-The-Move
Burgess-Limerick, Ben, Lehnert, Chris, Leitner, Jurgen, Corke, Peter
Abstract-- We present a generalised architecture for reactive mobile manipulation while a robot's base is in motion toward the next objective in a high-level task. By performing tasks onthe-move, overall cycle time is reduced compared to methods where the base pauses during manipulation. Reactive control of the manipulator enables grasping objects with unpredictable motion while improving robustness against perception errors, environmental disturbances, and inaccurate robot control compared to open-loop, trajectory-based planning approaches. We present an example implementation of the architecture and investigate the performance on a series of pick and place tasks with both static and dynamic objects and compare the performance to baseline methods. Our method demonstrated a realworld success rate of over 99%, failing in only a single trial from 120 attempts with a physical robot system. The architecture is further demonstrated on other mobile manipulator platforms in simulation. Our approach reduces task time by up to 48%, while also improving reliability, gracefulness, and predictability compared to existing architectures for mobile manipulation.