The Nearest Neighbor (NN) Representation is an emerging computational model that is inspired by the brain. We study the complexity of representing a neuron (threshold function) using the NN representations. It is known that two anchors (the points to which NN is computed) are sufficient for a NN representation of a threshold function, however, the resolution (the maximum number of bits required for the entries of an anchor) is $O(n\log{n})$. In this work, the trade-off between the number of anchors and the resolution of a NN representation of threshold functions is investigated. We prove that the well-known threshold functions EQUALITY, COMPARISON, and ODD-MAX-BIT, which require 2 or 3 anchors and resolution of $O(n)$, can be represented by polynomially large number of anchors in $n$ and $O(\log{n})$ resolution. We conjecture that for all threshold functions, there are NN representations with polynomially large size and logarithmic resolution in $n$.

Neural networks successfully capture the computational power of the human brain for many tasks. Similarly inspired by the brain architecture, Nearest Neighbor (NN) representations is a novel approach of computation. We establish a firmer correspondence between NN representations and neural networks. Although it was known how to represent a single neuron using NN representations, there were no results even for small depth neural networks. Specifically, for depth-2 threshold circuits, we provide explicit constructions for their NN representation with an explicit bound on the number of bits to represent it. Example functions include NN representations of convex polytopes (AND of threshold gates), IP2, OR of threshold gates, and linear or exact decision lists.

The $\textit{von Neumann Computer Architecture}$ has a distinction between computation and memory. In contrast, the brain has an integrated architecture where computation and memory are indistinguishable. Motivated by the architecture of the brain, we propose a model of $\textit{associative computation}$ where memory is defined by a set of vectors in $\mathbb{R}^n$ (that we call $\textit{anchors}$), computation is performed by convergence from an input vector to a nearest neighbor anchor, and the output is a label associated with an anchor. Specifically, in this paper, we study the representation of Boolean functions in the associative computation model, where the inputs are binary vectors and the corresponding outputs are the labels ($0$ or $1$) of the nearest neighbor anchors. The information capacity of a Boolean function in this model is associated with two quantities: $\textit{(i)}$ the number of anchors (called $\textit{Nearest Neighbor (NN) Complexity}$) and $\textit{(ii)}$ the maximal number of bits representing entries of anchors (called $\textit{Resolution}$). We study symmetric Boolean functions and present constructions that have optimal NN complexity and resolution.

Consider multiple experts with overlapping expertise working on a classification problem under uncertain input. What constitutes a consistent set of opinions? How can we predict the opinions of experts on missing sub-domains? In this paper, we define a framework of to analyze this problem, termed "expert graphs." In an expert graph, vertices represent classes and edges represent binary opinions on the topics of their vertices. We derive necessary conditions for expert graph validity and use them to create "synthetic experts" which describe opinions consistent with the observed opinions of other experts. We show this framework to be equivalent to the well-studied linear ordering polytope. We show our conditions are not sufficient for describing all expert graphs on cliques, but are sufficient for cycles.

Varying domains and biased datasets can lead to differences between the training and the target distributions, known as covariate shift. Current approaches for alleviating this often rely on estimating the ratio of training and target probability density functions. These techniques require parameter tuning and can be unstable across different datasets. We present a new method for handling covariate shift using the empirical cumulative distribution function estimates of the target distribution by a rigorous generalization of a recent idea proposed by Vapnik and Izmailov. Further, we show experimentally that our method is more robust in its predictions, is not reliant on parameter tuning and shows similar classification performance compared to the current state-of-the-art techniques on synthetic and real datasets.

This observation has boosted interest in the field of artificial neural networks [Hopfield 82], [Rumelhart 82]. The latter are built by interconnecting artificial neurons whose behavior is inspired by that of biological neurons.

This observation has boosted interest in the field of artificial neural networks [Hopfield 82], [Rumelhart 82]. The latter are built by interconnecting artificial neurons whose behavior is inspired by that of biological neurons.

This observation has boosted interest in the field of artificial neural networks [Hopfield 82], [Rumelhart 82]. The latter are built by interconnecting artificial neurons whose behavior is inspired by that of biological neurons.

Linear threshold elements are the basic building blocks of artificial neural networks. A linear threshold element computes a function that is a sign of a weighted sum of the input variables. The weights are arbitrary integers; actually, they can be very big integers-exponential in the number of the input variables. However, in practice, it is difficult to implement big weights. In the present literature a distinction is made between the two extreme cases: linear threshold functions with polynomial-size weights as opposed to those with exponential-size weights.

A linear threshold element computes a function that is a sign of a weighted sum of the input variables. The weights are arbitrary integers; actually, they can be very big integers-exponential in the number of the input variables. However, in practice, it is difficult to implement big weights. In the present literature a distinction is made between the two extreme cases: linear threshold functions with polynomial-size weights as opposed to those with exponential-size weights. The main contribution of this paper is to fill up the gap by further refining that separation.