Large language models are trained on massive scrapes of the web, as required by current scaling laws. Most progress is made for English, given its abundance of high-quality pretraining data. For most other languages, however, such high quality pretraining data is unavailable. In this work, we study how to boost pretrained model performance in a data constrained target language by enlisting data from an auxiliary language for which high quality data is available. We study this by quantifying the performance gap between training with data in a data-rich auxiliary language compared with training in the target language, exploring the benefits of translation systems, studying the limitations of model scaling for data constrained languages, and proposing new methods for upsampling data from the auxiliary language. Our results show that stronger auxiliary datasets result in performance gains without modification to the model or training objective for close languages, and, in particular, that performance gains due to the development of more information-rich English pretraining datasets can extend to targeted language settings with limited data.

Tactile information effectively enables faster training and better task performance for learning-based in-hand manipulation. Existing approaches are validated in simulated environments with a large number of tactile sensors. However, attaching such sensors to a real robot hand is not applicable due to high cost and physical limitations. To enable real-world adoption of tactile sensors, this study investigates the impact of tactile sensors, including their varying quantities and placements on robot hands, on the dexterous manipulation task performance and analyzes the importance of each. Through empirically decreasing the sensor quantities, we successfully find an optimized set of tactile sensors (21 sensors) configuration, which keeps over 93% task performance with only 20% sensor quantities compared to the original set (92 sensors) for the block manipulation task, leading to a potential reduction of over 80% in sensor manufacturing and design costs. To transform the empirical results into a generalizable understanding, we build a task performance prediction model with a weighted linear regression algorithm and use it to forecast the task performance with different sensor configurations. To show its generalizability, we verified this model in egg and pen manipulation tasks and achieved an average prediction error of 3.12%.

Language models (LMs) have long been used to improve results of automatic speech recognition (ASR) systems, but they are unaware of the errors that ASR systems make. Error correction models are designed to fix ASR errors, however, they showed little improvement over traditional LMs mainly due to the lack of supervised training data. In this paper, we present Denoising LM (DLM), which is a $\textit{scaled}$ error correction model trained with vast amounts of synthetic data, significantly exceeding prior attempts meanwhile achieving new state-of-the-art ASR performance. We use text-to-speech (TTS) systems to synthesize audio, which is fed into an ASR system to produce noisy hypotheses, which are then paired with the original texts to train the DLM. DLM has several $\textit{key ingredients}$: (i) up-scaled model and data; (ii) usage of multi-speaker TTS systems; (iii) combination of multiple noise augmentation strategies; and (iv) new decoding techniques. With a Transformer-CTC ASR, DLM achieves 1.5% word error rate (WER) on $\textit{test-clean}$ and 3.3% WER on $\textit{test-other}$ on Librispeech, which to our knowledge are the best reported numbers in the setting where no external audio data are used and even match self-supervised methods which use external audio data. Furthermore, a single DLM is applicable to different ASRs, and greatly surpassing the performance of conventional LM based beam-search rescoring. These results indicate that properly investigated error correction models have the potential to replace conventional LMs, holding the key to a new level of accuracy in ASR systems.

Vision-Language Models (VLMs) such as GPT-4V have recently demonstrated incredible strides on diverse vision language tasks. We dig into vision-based deductive reasoning, a more sophisticated but less explored realm, and find previously unexposed blindspots in the current SOTA VLMs. Specifically, we leverage Raven's Progressive Matrices (RPMs), to assess VLMs' abilities to perform multi-hop relational and deductive reasoning relying solely on visual clues. We perform comprehensive evaluations of several popular VLMs employing standard strategies such as in-context learning, self-consistency, and Chain-of-thoughts (CoT) on three diverse datasets, including the Mensa IQ test, IntelligenceTest, and RAVEN. The results reveal that despite the impressive capabilities of LLMs in text-based reasoning, we are still far from achieving comparable proficiency in visual deductive reasoning. We found that certain standard strategies that are effective when applied to LLMs do not seamlessly translate to the challenges presented by visual reasoning tasks. Moreover, a detailed analysis reveals that VLMs struggle to solve these tasks mainly because they are unable to perceive and comprehend multiple, confounding abstract patterns in RPM examples.

Recent methods have demonstrated that Large Language Models (LLMs) can solve reasoning tasks better when they are encouraged to solve subtasks of the main task first. In this paper we devise a similar strategy that breaks down reasoning tasks into a problem decomposition phase and a problem solving phase and show that the strategy is able to outperform a single stage solution. Further, we hypothesize that the decomposition should be easier to distill into a smaller model compared to the problem solving because the latter requires large amounts of domain knowledge while the former only requires learning general problem solving strategies. We propose methods to distill these two capabilities and evaluate their impact on reasoning outcomes and inference cost. We find that we can distill the problem decomposition phase and at the same time achieve good generalization across tasks, datasets, and models. However, it is harder to distill the problem solving capability without losing performance and the resulting distilled model struggles with generalization. These results indicate that by using smaller, distilled problem decomposition models in combination with problem solving LLMs we can achieve reasoning with cost-efficient inference and local adaptation.

Large language models are trained on massive scrapes of the web, which are often unstructured, noisy, and poorly phrased. Current scaling laws show that learning from such data requires an abundance of both compute and data, which grows with the size of the model being trained. This is infeasible both because of the large compute costs and duration associated with pre-training, and the impending scarcity of high-quality data on the web. In this work, we propose Web Rephrase Augmented Pre-training ($\textbf{WRAP}$) that uses an off-the-shelf instruction-tuned model prompted to paraphrase documents on the web in specific styles such as "like Wikipedia" or in "question-answer format" to jointly pre-train LLMs on real and synthetic rephrases. First, we show that using WRAP on the C4 dataset, which is naturally noisy, speeds up pre-training by $\sim3x$. At the same pre-training compute budget, it improves perplexity by more than 10% on average across different subsets of the Pile, and improves zero-shot question answer accuracy across 13 tasks by more than 2%. Second, we investigate the impact of the re-phrasing style on the performance of the model, offering insights into how the composition of the training data can impact the performance of LLMs in OOD settings. Our gains are attributed to the fact that re-phrased synthetic data has higher utility than just real data because it (i) incorporates style diversity that closely reflects downstream evaluation style, and (ii) has higher 'quality' than web-scraped data.

Due to the expanding scope of machine learning (ML) to the fields of sensor networking, cooperative robotics and many other multi-agent systems, distributed deployment of inference algorithms has received a lot of attention. These algorithms involve collaboratively learning unknown parameters from dispersed data collected by multiple agents. There are two competing aspects in such algorithms, namely, intra-agent computation and inter-agent communication. Traditionally, algorithms are designed to perform both synchronously. However, certain circumstances need frugal use of communication channels as they are either unreliable, time-consuming, or resource-expensive. In this paper, we propose gossip-based asynchronous communication to leverage fast computations and reduce communication overhead simultaneously. We analyze the effects of multiple (local) intra-agent computations by the active agents between successive inter-agent communications. For local computations, Bayesian sampling via unadjusted Langevin algorithm (ULA) MCMC is utilized. The communication is assumed to be over a connected graph (e.g., as in decentralized learning), however, the results can be extended to coordinated communication where there is a central server (e.g., federated learning). We theoretically quantify the convergence rates in the process. To demonstrate the efficacy of the proposed algorithm, we present simulations on a toy problem as well as on real world data sets to train ML models to perform classification tasks. We observe faster initial convergence and improved performance accuracy, especially in the low data range. We achieve on average 78% and over 90% classification accuracy respectively on the Gamma Telescope and mHealth data sets from the UCI ML repository.

Current approaches to evaluating large language models (LLMs) with pre-existing Knowledge Graphs (KG) mostly ignore the structure of the KG and make arbitrary choices of which part of the graph to evaluate. In this paper, we introduce KGLens, a method to evaluate LLMs by generating natural language questions from a KG in a structure aware manner so that we can characterize its performance on a more aggregated level. KGLens uses a parameterized KG, where each edge is augmented with a beta distribution that guides how to sample edges from the KG for QA testing. As the evaluation proceeds, different edges of the parameterized KG are sampled and assessed appropriately, converging to a more global picture of the performance of the LLMs on the KG as a whole. In our experiments, we construct three domain-specific KGs for knowledge assessment, comprising over 19,000 edges, 700 relations, and 21,000 entities. The results demonstrate that KGLens can not only assess overall performance but also provide topic, temporal, and relation analyses of LLMs. This showcases the adaptability and customizability of KGLens, emphasizing its ability to focus the evaluation based on specific criteria.

Datasets that pair Knowledge Graphs (KG) and text together (KG-T) can be used to train forward and reverse neural models that generate text from KG and vice versa. However models trained on datasets where KG and text pairs are not equivalent can suffer from more hallucination and poorer recall. In this paper, we verify this empirically by generating datasets with different levels of noise and find that noisier datasets do indeed lead to more hallucination. We argue that the ability of forward and reverse models trained on a dataset to cyclically regenerate source KG or text is a proxy for the equivalence between the KG and the text in the dataset. Using cyclic evaluation we find that manually created WebNLG is much better than automatically created TeKGen and T-REx. Guided by these observations, we construct a new, improved dataset called LAGRANGE using heuristics meant to improve equivalence between KG and text and show the impact of each of the heuristics on cyclic evaluation. We also construct two synthetic datasets using large language models (LLMs), and observe that these are conducive to models that perform significantly well on cyclic generation of text, but less so on cyclic generation of KGs, probably because of a lack of a consistent underlying ontology.

In this paper, a novel approach to the output-feedback inverse reinforcement learning (IRL) problem is developed by casting the IRL problem, for linear systems with quadratic cost functions, as a state estimation problem. Two observer-based techniques for IRL are developed, including a novel observer method that re-uses previous state estimates via history stacks. Theoretical guarantees for convergence and robustness are established under appropriate excitation conditions. Simulations demonstrate the performance of the developed observers and filters under noisy and noise-free measurements.