Individuals have been increasingly interacting with online Large Language Models (LLMs), both in their work and personal lives. These interactions raise privacy issues as the LLMs are typically hosted by third-parties who can gather a variety of sensitive information about users and their companies. Text Sanitization techniques have been proposed in the literature and can be used to sanitize user prompts before sending them to the LLM. However, sanitization has an impact on the downstream task performed by the LLM, and often to such an extent that it leads to unacceptable results for the user. This is not just a minor annoyance, with clear monetary consequences as LLM services charge on a per use basis as well as great amount of computing resources wasted. We propose an architecture leveraging a Small Language Model (SLM) at the user-side to help estimate the impact of sanitization on a prompt before it is sent to the LLM, thus preventing resource losses. Our evaluation of this architecture revealed a significant problem with text sanitization based on Differential Privacy, on which we want to draw the attention of the community for further investigation.

Two parties wish to collaborate on their datasets. However, before they reveal their datasets to each other, the parties want to have the guarantee that the collaboration would be fruitful. We look at this problem from the point of view of machine learning, where one party is promised an improvement on its prediction model by incorporating data from the other party. The parties would only wish to collaborate further if the updated model shows an improvement in accuracy. Before this is ascertained, the two parties would not want to disclose their models and datasets. In this work, we construct an interactive protocol for this problem based on the fully homomorphic encryption scheme over the Torus (TFHE) and label differential privacy, where the underlying machine learning model is a neural network. Label differential privacy is used to ensure that computations are not done entirely in the encrypted domain, which is a significant bottleneck for neural network training according to the current state-of-the-art FHE implementations. We prove the security of our scheme in the universal composability framework assuming honest-but-curious parties, but where one party may not have any expertise in labelling its initial dataset. Experiments show that we can obtain the output, i.e., the accuracy of the updated model, with time many orders of magnitude faster than a protocol using entirely FHE operations.

Biometric authentication service providers often claim that it is not possible to reverse-engineer a user's raw biometric sample, such as a fingerprint or a face image, from its mathematical (feature-space) representation. In this paper, we investigate this claim on the specific example of deep neural network (DNN) embeddings. Inversion of DNN embeddings has been investigated for explaining deep image representations or synthesizing normalized images. Existing studies leverage full access to all layers of the original model, as well as all possible information on the original dataset. For the biometric authentication use case, we need to investigate this under adversarial settings where an attacker has access to a feature-space representation but no direct access to the exact original dataset nor the original learned model. Instead, we assume varying degree of attacker's background knowledge about the distribution of the dataset as well as the original learned model (architecture and training process). In these cases, we show that the attacker can exploit off-the-shelf DNN models and public datasets, to mimic the behaviour of the original learned model to varying degrees of success, based only on the obtained representation and attacker's prior knowledge. We propose a two-pronged attack that first infers the original DNN by exploiting the model footprint on the embedding, and then reconstructs the raw data by using the inferred model. We show the practicality of the attack on popular DNNs trained for two prominent biometric modalities, face and fingerprint recognition. The attack can effectively infer the original recognition model (mean accuracy 83\% for faces, 86\% for fingerprints), and can craft effective biometric reconstructions that are successfully authenticated with 1-vs-1 authentication accuracy of up to 92\% for some models.

One of the new developments in chit-chat bots is a long-term memory mechanism that remembers information from past conversations for increasing engagement and consistency of responses. The bot is designed to extract knowledge of personal nature from their conversation partner, e.g., stating preference for a particular color. In this paper, we show that this memory mechanism can result in unintended behavior. In particular, we found that one can combine a personal statement with an informative statement that would lead the bot to remember the informative statement alongside personal knowledge in its long term memory. This means that the bot can be tricked into remembering misinformation which it would regurgitate as statements of fact when recalling information relevant to the topic of conversation. We demonstrate this vulnerability on the BlenderBot 2 framework implemented on the ParlAI platform and provide examples on the more recent and significantly larger BlenderBot 3 model. We generate 150 examples of misinformation, of which 114 (76%) were remembered by BlenderBot 2 when combined with a personal statement. We further assessed the risk of this misinformation being recalled after intervening innocuous conversation and in response to multiple questions relevant to the injected memory. Our evaluation was performed on both the memory-only and the combination of memory and internet search modes of BlenderBot 2. From the combinations of these variables, we generated 12,890 conversations and analyzed recalled misinformation in the responses. We found that when the chat bot is questioned on the misinformation topic, it was 328% more likely to respond with the misinformation as fact when the misinformation was in the long-term memory.

Differential Privacy is one of the strongest privacy guarantees, which allows the release of useful information about any sensitive dataset. However, it provides the same level of protection for all elements in the data universe. In this paper, we consider $d_{\mathcal{X}}$-privacy, an instantiation of the privacy notion introduced in \cite{chatzikokolakis2013broadening}, which allows specifying a separate privacy budget for each pair of elements in the data universe. We describe a systematic procedure to tailor any existing differentially private mechanism into a $d_{\mathcal{X}}$-private variant for the case of linear queries. For the resulting $d_{\mathcal{X}}$-private mechanisms, we provide theoretical guarantees on the trade-off between utility and privacy, and show that they always outperform their \emph{vanilla} counterpart. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our procedure, by evaluating the proposed $d_{\mathcal{X}}$-private Laplace mechanism on both synthetic and real datasets using a set of randomly generated linear queries.