A large number of studies rely on closed-style multiple-choice surveys to evaluate cultural alignment in Large Language Models (LLMs). In this work, we challenge this constrained evaluation paradigm and explore more realistic, unconstrained approaches. Using the World Values Survey (WVS) and Hofstede Cultural Dimensions as case studies, we demonstrate that LLMs exhibit stronger cultural alignment in less constrained settings, where responses are not forced. Additionally, we show that even minor changes, such as reordering survey choices, lead to inconsistent outputs, exposing the limitations of closed-style evaluations. Our findings advocate for more robust and flexible evaluation frameworks that focus on specific cultural proxies, encouraging more nuanced and accurate assessments of cultural alignment in LLMs.

In politically sensitive scenarios like wars, social media serves as a platform for polarized discourse and expressions of strong ideological stances. While prior studies have explored ideological stance detection in general contexts, limited attention has been given to conflict-specific settings. This study addresses this gap by analyzing 9,969 Reddit comments related to the Israel-Palestine conflict, collected between October 2023 and August 2024. The comments were categorized into three stance classes: Pro-Israel, Pro-Palestine, and Neutral. Various approaches, including machine learning, pre-trained language models, neural networks, and prompt engineering strategies for open source large language models (LLMs), were employed to classify these stances. Performance was assessed using metrics such as accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score. Among the tested methods, the Scoring and Reflective Re-read prompt in Mixtral 8x7B demonstrated the highest performance across all metrics. This study provides comparative insights into the effectiveness of different models for detecting ideological stances in highly polarized social media contexts. The dataset used in this research is publicly available for further exploration and validation.

Note: This paper includes examples of potentially offensive content related to religious bias, presented solely for academic purposes. The widespread adoption of language models highlights the need for critical examinations of their inherent biases, particularly concerning religion. This study systematically investigates religious bias in both language models and text-to-image generation models, analyzing both open-source and closed-source systems. We construct approximately 400 unique, naturally occurring prompts to probe language models for religious bias across diverse tasks, including mask filling, prompt completion, and image generation. Our experiments reveal concerning instances of underlying stereotypes and biases associated disproportionately with certain religions. Additionally, we explore cross-domain biases, examining how religious bias intersects with demographic factors such as gender, age, and nationality. This study further evaluates the effectiveness of targeted debiasing techniques by employing corrective prompts designed to mitigate the identified biases. Our findings demonstrate that language models continue to exhibit significant biases in both text and image generation tasks, emphasizing the urgent need to develop fairer language models to achieve global acceptability.